Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety

Description:

Public may view NPMS maps for one county per session ... Public facilities (schools, nursing homes, etc.) Quads and aerial photographs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:246
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: sdwa9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety


1
Public Awareness andPipeline Safety
  • BC Oil Gas Symposium
  • February 27, 2007
  • Dan Kirschner
  • Executive Director

2
5335 SW Meadows Rd., 220 Lake Oswego, OR
97035 (503) 624-2160 www.nwga.org NWGA
Members Avista Corporation Cascade Natural Gas
Co. Intermountain Gas Co. NW Natural Puget Sound
Energy Duke Energy Gas Transmission Terasen
Gas TransCanadas GTN System Williams NW Pipeline
3
Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety
  • Publics right to know where pipelines are
  • Understand and assess risk
  • Partner in safety
  • Owners responsibility to operate safely and
    securely
  • Ensuring the public has access to appropriate and
    useful information
  • How much information is too much?

4
A Little History
  • June, 1999 Bellingham, WA petroleum pipeline
    explosion kills three young people, June 1999
  • August, 2000 Carlsbad, NM natural gas pipeline
    explosion kills twelve people
  • September 11, 2001
  • December, 2002 Pipeline Safety Improvement Act
    signed requiring Public Awareness efforts

5
Public Awareness Drivers
  • Enlightened Self-Interest
  • Improved Pipeline Safety
  • Enhanced Damage Prevention
  • Effective Emergency Response
  • Emergency Contacts
  • Federal mandate 02 Pipeline Safety Improvement
    Act
  • OPS incorporated API RP 1162 in 49 CFR Parts 192
    and 195
  • RP 1162 a set of guidelines/best practices for
    Public Awareness programs developed by
  • Industry representatives
  • Office of Pipeline Safety
  • National Assn. of Pipeline Safety Representatives
  • Public stakeholders

6
Establishing a Baseline
  • WUTC-commissioned research questions
  • What do people who live along pipelines NEED to
    know?
  • What do they WANT to know?
  • How can we BEST keep them informed?
  • Research methodology
  • Review existing published data
  • Key Leader/Organizational interviews
  • Public Opinion Research
  • 500 Statewide 400 Pipeline error /- 4.5
  • Focus groups

7
WUTC Key Leader Survey
  • Includes 31 Interviews
  • Elected and state agency officials, local
    governments, operators and advocacy groups
  • Weighted toward residents/activists and first
    responders
  • Findings
  • No clear consensus on how to deliver message.
  • Message delivery seems to be disparate,
    uncoordinated, difficult to access
  • Local community involvement is paramount
  • People should know
  • Where it is
  • Whats in it
  • Who it serves

8
WUTC Stakeholder Survey
  • Includes 201 automated phone surveys
  • Local governments, contractors, community and
    environmental groups, media
  • Findings
  • All messages tested important (70) most
    important
  • Pipeline location
  • How to recognize problems
  • What to do when a problem arises
  • Including emergencies
  • Current processes inadequate to task
  • Should utilize radio, TV, Direct Mail

9
WUTC Public Opinion
  • They want to know it all
  • Emergency plans
  • Potential dangers
  • Rights of property owners
  • Who to contact

10
What they dont know
  • More than 60 percent living within 1,000 feet of
    major pipeline knew it
  • Only 45 percent said they knew whom to call in a
    pipeline emergency.

11
To be or not to be (aware)
  • More likely to strongly agree pipelines essential
  • More likely to strongly believe safer than trucks
    barges
  • More likely to feel safer living near a pipeline
  • More likely to pay attention

12
Key to awareness
  • Those aware want to receive information
  • Canvassing direct mail preferred
  • Those unaware want info available when THEY want
    it

13
Who has the trust?
1 No trust 5great trust
14
WUTC Recommendations
  • Cohesive, coordinated message
  • Use existing communication channels
  • Unite expertise with credibility
  • Focus on personal contacts
  • One-stop information location
  • Common visual tool/branding

15
RP 1162 Principle Objectives
  • Make public education and pipeline awareness
    campaigns along pipeline routes more effective by
    standardizing frequency and content
  • Provide recommended baseline public awareness
    program and guidance for determining supplemental
    activities
  • Provide guidance for evaluating program
    effectiveness and continuous improvement

16
So, Whats the Rub?
17
Making Useful Information Available Without
Comprising Security
  • Post Bham, pre 9/11
  • NPMS to the web
  • WA Pipeline Safety Act calls for creation of
    statewide geospatial (GIS) database
  • For first responders/local jurisdictions
  • Post 9/11
  • Retrench recognition of CEII and securing
    certain information from disclosure
  • Present

18
Federal
  • PHMSA finalizing process of re-posting NPMS data
    to the web with restrictions
  • Data sharing restrictions will be lifted for
    county and local government users
  • Nothing will change for Federal users, state
    users, and pipeline operator users

19
Proposed General Public Access
  • Public may view NPMS maps for one county per
    session
  • Adjacent county pipeline data will be hidden
  • Level of detail limited to 124,000
  • Certain layers will be removed
  • Unusually Sensitive Areas
  • Public facilities (schools, nursing homes, etc.)
  • Quads and aerial photographs
  • Public will not have access to raw (downloadable)
    data

20
(No Transcript)
21
Public users may only view one county at a
time (Shown here Onondanga Co., NY)
22
Public users can zoom to 124,000 scale
23
Publicly Viewable Pipeline Attributes
  • Operator ID and name
  • System and subsystem name
  • Commodity
  • Inter/intrastate designation
  • Status In service/abandoned/retired

24
Data Sharing Policy
  • Retain nondisclosure agreement for state/federal
    officials requesting raw data
  • Revise policy for county/local officials
    requesting raw data
  • One county only
  • No restrictions in sharing the data can display
    data on public web site if desired
  • May not make data available for downloading

25
Washington State
  • Leader in pipeline safety and public awareness
    efforts
  • Bellingham legacy
  • Citizens Committee
  • Pipeline Safety Trust
  • Maps and map images publicly available since 2004
  • Maps on the web

26
User interface www.wutc.wa.gov/pipelinemaps
27
County
28
124,000
29
What about the raw data?
State-wide, including
  • Attributes
  • Diameter
  • MaOP
  • Pipe wall thickness
  • Manufacturer
  • Installation date
  • Commodity
  • Coating
  • Seam type
  • AND, certain features

30
Disposition of Raw data
  • Subject to public disclosure
  • An artifact of law not intentional
  • Feds dont but cant preempt state
  • No other state treats data similarly
  • BC, AB carefully managed
  • Managing the situation
  • Seek voluntary withdrawal of data requests
  • Legislation
  • Litigation

31
Conclusion
  • Striking the right balance
  • Public Awareness Is Important
  • Investing in
  • Informing partners
  • First responders
  • RoW landowners/residents
  • Providing communities with appropriate, useful
    information
  • Maps and map images
  • Certain information must be secured
  • Shared with regulators
  • Otherwise shared with discretion and conditionally

32
5335 SW Meadows Rd., 220 Lake Oswego, OR
97035 (503) 624-2160 www.nwga.org NWGA
Members Avista Corporation Cascade Natural Gas
Co. Intermountain Gas Co. NW Natural Puget Sound
Energy Duke Energy Gas Transmission Terasen
Gas TransCanadas GTN System Williams NW Pipeline
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com