Title: Developmental Psychology
1Chapter 2
- Developmental Psychology
- A description of the general approach to behavior
by developmental psychologists
2Concept of Behavior
- There is no single, overarching, comprehensive
developmental theory - Not at the level of scientific understanding
discussed in Ch. 1 - Various minitheories are used to account for
specific developmental domains - e.g., social-emotional, perceptual, language
- Text books tend to adopt a cognitive approach to
development
3Why Such Theoretical Diversity?
- Subject matter varies widely
- e.g. genetics, biology, and environment
- Structural approach to behavior is taken
- Behavior is largely classified according to its
form or structure - Research methods and resulting data do not
represent basic scientific facts - Correlational research
4Form versus Function
- A structural approach (Form) helps organize and
communicate about subject matter - But...
- Overlooks function/ hinders functional analysis
of behavior - Behaviors that differ in form may have similar
functions - Example Attachment
- Most behaviors can be classified according to
more than one form - Example baby reaching for mom
5Example Attachment
- Developmental Psychology
- Classifies types of attachment based on
topography of behavior - infant leaves side of parent and explores
environment secure attachment - Infant clings to parent shows signs of distress
when parent leaves anxious attachment
6Example Attachment
- The topography of the child's behavior is the
indicator of development - Secure or anxious attachment are considered
different behaviors requiring different
explanations - From a functional perspective, the differing
responses may serve the same function (i.e.
reinforcement) - Exploring reinforced by finding new toys
- Clinging reinforced by being held/consoled
7Example Baby reaching for Mom when she is in
close proximity
- This response can be classified according to
several categories or minitheories - Memory
- Perception
- Motor behavior
- Social behavior
8Form versus Function
- What is the best way to conceptualize behavior in
terms of the goals of science (control,
prediction, understanding)? - BOTH form and function are necessary for a
comprehensive account of behavior - A concentration on function is important for
answering how and why behavior occurs
9Structural Approaches Explanations of Behavior
- Different forms of behavior are assumed to be
qualitatively different and thus require
different theories - This leads to the abundance of minitheories in
developmental psychology - Theoretical Eclecticism
10Structural Approaches Explanations of Behavior
- Circular reasoning (reification)
- Class of behavior is given a name
- Name is referred to as concrete object and
becomes the object of study - Name of class becomes the explanation of observed
behavior - Only evidence of the concept is the behavior to
be explained
11Example of Circular Reasoning
- 1) Infant displays certain behavior toward absent
objects- behavior is called object permanence - 2) object permanence is studied as a concept
- 3) When infant behave a certain way toward absent
objects it is said to happen because they now
possess object permanence
12Problems with Circular Reasoning
- Is not explanatory
- Do not address the actual determinants of
behavior - May prohibit development of more scientific
explanations
13Research Theory in Developmental Psychology
- Correlational Research
- Stage Theories
14Correlational Research
- Drawbacks
- Nonexperimental observations generate
correlations between two variables - Do not represent functional relations
- Age gender are commonly used as independent
variables - Scientific definition of IV includes those whose
values are directly manipulated by the
experimenter (McCain Segal, 1988) - Correlation does not mean causation
- Yet causal inferences are drawn from data
15Correlational Research
- Value/ Purpose
- Allows some prediction of behavior
- Can suggest something about IVs
- Demonstrates whether a behavior is present or not
at a particular age, but not how that behavior
came to be - Age becomes cause of behavior
16Correlational Research Theory Construction
- Changes in age and changes in behavior are
frequently positively correlated - These correlations often lead to stage theories
of development
17Stage Theories
- Discontinuous view of development
- Stages seem to represent fixed, biological
physiological changes - Stages are independent of of behavior-environment
interaction - examples Piaget, Freud, Greenspan, Maslow
18Problems with Structural Approach to Behavior
Change
- Structures are not directly observable
- e.g., Freud's id, ego, superego
- Underlying behavioral processes are overlooked or
made unclear - Description is confused with explanation
- Transitional nature of behavior change is ignored
19Problems with Structural Approach to Behavior
Change
- 4) Constitutional-maturational determinants of
behavior change are emphasized at expense of
environmental/physiological variables - 5) Optimism about potential benefits of
environmental manipulations is reduced - 6) Interpretations easily lead to reification
(circular reasoning) - - determinants of behavior come from inside the
child - - does not explain or help us understand
behavior
20Developmental Theory Assessed
- Generality
- Absence of basic functional units of analysis
- No theory can encompass more than its own limited
domain, thus minitheories - Testability (both empirical logical support)
- Theories that rely on hypothetical, cognitive
structures cannot be tested - External Validity
- Precise predictions are almost impossible if a
theory is not based on classes of functional
relations between observable events
21Developmental Theory Assessed
- Utility
- Many developmental theories do direct attention
to interesting phenomena - Less successful at generating practical
applications - Applications should be tempered if theories do
not meet scientific credibility - Parsimony
- Assumptions are hypothetical
22Developmental Theory Assessed
- Verdict
- The general theoretical approach found in
developmental psychology does not meet criteria
for scientific understanding - Does not explain behavioral development well