Charter Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Charter Schools

Description:

Title: Charter Schools Author: VCS Last modified by: Rich Schmidt Created Date: 11/6/2000 6:49:36 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: vcs99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Charter Schools


1
Charter Schools
  • An Objective Overview

2
Introduction
  • The purpose of this presentation is to examine
    what a charter school is and explore some
    positive and negative aspects of this movement.
  • Developed by Stacey Schmidt

3
Table of Contents
  • I. Charter History
  • II. Charter Facts
  • III. What is the Charter Idea?
  • IV. What is a Charter School?
  • V. Arguments for Charter Schools
  • VI. Arguments against Charter Schools

4
Charter History
  • The charter school concept dates back to the
    1970s.
  • New England educator Ray Budde developed the
    idea, stating that teachers should be given a
    charter by their local school boards to explore
    new approaches.

5
Charter History
  • In the late 1980s, Philadelphia started many
    schools within a school.
  • Minnesota refined the concept and was the first
    state to pass a Charter School Law in 1991.

6
Charter Facts
  • Charters are usually granted for any term not
    exceeding five school years and usually may be
    renewed for terms not exceeding five years.
  • Charter school legislation varies from state to
    state. Each state makes their own regulations.
  • Charters may be granted to schools by local
    school boards, the state school board,
    universities, and the state commissioner of
    education.

7
Charter Facts
  • Some states dictate that only a teacher-led group
    may apply for a charter.
  • Other states allow any public body, private
    person, parent group, business leader, or
    independent organization to apply for a charter.

8
Charter Facts
  • The U.S. Department of Educations first-year
    report on charter schools found that charters
    were proposed to
  • 1. Realize a vision of better teaching and
    learning
  • 2. Follow a specific instructional
    philosophy
  • 3. Have greater autonomy, flexibility, and
    relief from governmental regulations
  • 4. Serve a special population

9
Why start a Charter School?
Taken from The State of Charter Schools
Third-Year Report May 1999
10
Charter Facts
  • Parents cite the following reasons for sending
    their children to charter schools, according to a
    U.S. Department of Education report
  • 1. Small school and class sizes
  • 2. Higher standards
  • 3. Educational philosophy
  • 4. Safety
  • 5. The failure of the traditional public
    schools to meet the needs of their children

11
Charter Facts
  • As of January 2000, 36 states and the District of
    Columbia have Charter Laws and there are 1,484
    charter schools in existence
  • States with Charter Legislation, by Year of
    Enactment

Taken from The State of Charter Schools
Third-Year Report May 1999
12
Charter Facts
  • There is a high demand for charter schools 7 of
    10 charter schools report that they have a
    waiting list.
  • 59 charter schools which is about four percent
    of all charter schools have closed since the
    first charter school opened in 1992.

13
Charter Schools in the U.S.
Taken from The State of Charter Schools
Third-Year Report May 1999
14
Charter Facts
  • Charter schools account for about 250,000
    students.
  • The average enrollment of all charter schools is
    about 137 students per school traditional public
    schools average about 475 students.
  • White students made up about 52 percent of
    charter school enrollment, as opposed to 58
    percent of traditional public school enrollment.

15
Ethnic Make-up of Charters
Taken from The State of Charter Schools
Third-Year Report May 1999
16
Charter Facts
  • 39 percent of charter school students were
    eligible for free or reduced-price lunch,
    compared to 38 percent of students in traditional
    public schools.
  • Students with disabilities made up eight percent
    of the student population in charter schools,
    compared to 11 percent of the student body in
    traditional public schools.

17
What is the Charter idea?
  • New public schools can be created or existing
    ones can be converted.
  • Anyone can attend a charter school.
  • These schools are responsible for student
    achievement during the length of the charter.
  • Charter agreements waive state rules and
    regulations in exchange for accountability and
    results.

18
What is the Charter idea?
  • It allows groups such as parents, teachers,
    universities, state and local school boards, and
    city governments to create schools.
  • It permits educators and families to select
    schools.
  • Government funds that would be paid to the public
    school go to the charter school for each student
    .
  • Title I and other special funds follow the
    student to the charter school.

19
What is a Charter School?
  • They provide families with school choices.
  • They are public schools.
  • They are not micromanaged by government
    bureaucracies.
  • They are open to all.
  • They are paid for by tax dollars.
  • They are accountable to public authorities for
    student learning results.
  • They provide freedom to experiment with
    traditional grade-level groupings.

20
Charter School Grade Divisions
Taken from The State of Charter Schools
Third-Year Report May 1999
21
Arguments for Charter Schools
  • They improve student achievement.
  • Charter school success will force traditional
    public schools to improve education or lose
    students.
  • Charters may be revoked if it is found that the
    school violated its contract, failed to comply
    with generally accepted accounting standards of
    fiscal management, or if students who enrolled
    failed to make sufficient progress in attaining
    educational goals.

22
Arguments for Charter Schools
  • In addition to being accountable to their
    chartering entity, the schools must be
    accountable to state law, which includes
    voluntary admission, nondiscriminatory practices,
    and health and safety requirements.
  • Some claim that since charters may be revoked,
    charter schools work harder to meet their goals.

23
Ways Charter Schools are Accountable
Taken from The State of Charter Schools
Third-Year Report May 1999
24
Arguments for Charter Schools
  • Competition does improve public schools. Charter
    schools are not allowed to select students on the
    basis of academic ability and are given the same
    per-pupil dollars as traditional public schools.
  • Most charter schools had a slightly lower teacher
    to student ratio than did all public schools in
    1997-98.

25
Arguments for Charter Schools
  • In a report done by the Department of Education,
    it was found that nearly nine of ten charter
    schools were monitored for accountability in
    terms of financial accounts seven of ten for
    student achievement and for student attendance
    and six of ten for compliance with regulations
    and instructional practices.

26
Arguments for Charter Schools
  • Charter schools encourage innovation in teaching
    practices and teacher professional development.
  • Students report higher satisfaction in their
    educational experience in Charter schools, mostly
    due to smaller class sizes.
  • Charter schools create authentic site-based
    management in public schools.

27
Arguments for Charter Schools
  • A Colorado study concluded, "the performance of
    charter schools, as a whole, on the Colorado
    Student Assessment Program (CSAP), was stronger
    than state averages, stronger than sponsoring
    district averages, and stronger than the average
    performance of other public schools in the same
    socioeconomic classification level."

28
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • Accountability
  • School boards are ambivalent about their
    responsibilities to monitor charter schools.
    Many are reluctant to become involved.

29
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • Accountability
  • The success of charter schools often depends
    heavily on strong, well-connected leaders.
  • Some research raises serious questions about the
    claims made by charter school advocates as to the
    power of accountability, autonomy, choice, and
    competition to improve the efficiency and quality
    of charter schools over public schools.

30
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • For-Profit Charter Schools
  • They receive the same money per child as
    non-charter schools, yet they make a profit.
  • In order to make a profit, they must eliminate
    some of their expenses.

31
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • For-Profit Charter Schools
  • In order to cut expenses, they dont offer all of
    the programs that public schools offer.
  • They receive money for transportation, yet some
    do not provide transportation.

32
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • For-Profit Charter Schools
  • Special education students often sign over their
    right to specialized services and their right to
    follow their individualized education plan.
  • The special education money is kept for profit
    instead of being spent on the student.

33
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • For-Profit Charter Schools
  • The requirement that charter schools reflects the
    racial/ethnic makeup of their districts has not
    been enforced.
  • Charter schools exercise considerable control
    over the type of students they serve. Thus, in
    some cases, charter schools have more choice than
    parents do.
  • Charter schools vary widely in their ability to
    generate private sources of revenue.

34
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • For-Profit Charter Schools
  • There is often a high mobility rate of the
    students attending a charter school.
  • Teacher turn-over can be higher than public
    schools.
  • They have a lack of support structures outside of
    themselves.

35
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • Other Points
  • Not all charter schools require teachers to be
    certified.
  • Not all charter schools are ethnically balanced.
  • Teachers tend to have heavy work loads without
    adequate preparation time.
  • Competition does not improve public schools.

36
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • Other Points
  • Charter schools want to assess without use of
    standardized tests however, there is a lack of
    alternative authentic assessment tools.
  • Studies have found that ungraded charter schools
    have a much higher student to teacher ratio, 18.8
    students per teacher, as compared to 8.8 students
    per teacher in other public schools.

37
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • Other Points
  • Lots of charter schools are doing similar things,
    but few are learning from each other.
  • Most charter school leaders want to be the ones
    to accomplish a ground-breaking feat, rather than
    learning from the mistakes of others and building
    on the successes of others.

38
Arguments against Charter Schools
  • Other Points
  • Charter schools will siphon money away from
    districts, thus destroying the public school
    system.

39
Bibliography
  • The State of Charter Schools Third-Year Report.
    May 1999. http//www.ed.gov/pubs/charter3rdyear/D.
    html
  • National Study of Charter Schools. May 1999.
    Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
    U.S. Department of Education. Internet Source.
  • The State of Charter Schools 2000. Fourth Year
    Report. January 2000. http//www.ed.gov/pubs/cha
    rter4thyear/
  • U.S. Dept. of Education National Study of
    Charter Schools. Second Year Study. August
    1998. Internet Source.
  • 1998-1999 Colorado Charter Schools Evaluation
    Study Ð Executive Summary. Internet Source.
  • Frequently Asked Questions Center on Reinventing
    Public Education.University of Washington.
    http//www.crpe.org/CharterSchools/csfaqs.html
  • Teske, P., Schneider, M., Buckley, J., Clark, S.
    Does Charter School Competition Improve
    Traditional Public Schools? SUNY-Stony Brook.
    June 2000. Internet Source.
  • Colorado Charter Schools Evaluation Study The
    Characteristics, Status and Performance Record of
    Colorado Charter Schools. Colorado Department of
    Education. January 2000. Internet Source.
  • NGA Reports online. Charter Schools
    Challenging Traditions and Changing Attitudes.

40
Bibliography
  • Schwarz, M. (1996) How Well are Charter Schools
    Serving Urban and Minority Students? ERIC
    Clearinghouse on Urban Education. Internet
    Source.
  • Nathan, J. (1998) Heat and light in the charter
    school Movement. Phi Delta Kappan. Volume 79.
    Number 7. pp. 499-505.
  • Manno, B., Finn, C., Bierlein, L., Vanourek, G.
    (1998) How Charter schools are different. Phi
    Delta Kappan. Volume 79. Number 7. pp.
    488-498.
  • Garn, G. (1998) The thinking behind Arizonas
    charter movement. Educational Leadership. pp.
    48-50.
  • Dykgraff, C., Lewis, S. (1998) For-profit
    charter schools What the public needs to know.
    Educational Leadership. pp. 51-53
  • Lathrop and Clark. (1998) Charter schools.
    Wisconsin School News. pp. 23-25.
  • Schnailberg, L. (1998) Charter schools struggle
    with accountability. Education Week. Volume
    XVII. Number 39.
  • Saks, J. (1998) A closer look at charters. The
    American School Board Journal. pp. 14-19.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com