OIL FIELD REMOVAL ACTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

OIL FIELD REMOVAL ACTIONS

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Corporate User Last modified by: koshys Created Date: 10/18/2001 4:05:00 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:186
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Corp49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OIL FIELD REMOVAL ACTIONS


1
OIL FIELD REMOVAL ACTIONS STILL PLUGGING AWAY
IN THE FOREST Special Presentation to the
Regional Response Team September 20, 2006
Vincent E. Zenone, OSC U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region III
2
Still Plugging Away in the Forest
  • the forest northwestern Pennsylvania oil
    patch
  • 1859 Colonel Edwin L. Drake first oil well
    (production facility) in PA
  • by the 1970s many oil production facilities had
    become abandoned
  • EPA conducted emergency response activities on a
    source-specific basis
  • Although emergency response ensured the effective
    and immediate removal of a discharge on a
    source-specific basis
  • In some cases, EPA responded to discharges from
    the same production facility weeks, months or
    years later
  • In may cases, the plugging of one well resulted
    in other wells leaking and
  • In most cases, source-specific response actions
    did not provide sufficient information to
    identify the Responsible Party.
  • As it became increasingly apparent that response
    on a source-specific basis to a discharge (e.g.
    plugging one or two wells) did not mitigate or
    prevent the substantial threat of discharges
    posed by an abandoned oil production facility.
  • it became increasingly apparent that more
    comprehensive oil field removal evaluations and
    removal actions were required at oil production
    facilities.
  • Operational Response Phases for Oil Removal

3
Oil Field Removal Actions
  • 40 CFR 300 Subpart D
  • Operational Response Phases for Oil Removal
  • 300.300 Phase I Discovery or Notification
  • 300.305 Phase II Preliminary
    Assessment/Initiation of Action
  • removal evaluation
  • discharge and/or substantial threat
  • operating versus abandoned facility
  • PRP-search versus identification of RP
  • 300.310 Phase III Containment,
    Countermeasures, Cleanup and Disposal
  • OPA90 Removal Project Plan 250,000
  • 300.315 Phase IV Documentation and Cost
    Recovery


4
Oil Field Removal Actions
What is all this CERCLA stuff doing in an OPA
presentation??
5
40 CFR 300 Subpart E Hazardous Substance
Response300.405 - Discovery or Notification
(kinda like oil Phase I)300.410 - Removal Site
Evaluation (kinda like oil Phase II) 300.415 -
Removal Action (kinda like oil Phase III)note
Documentation and Cost Recovery (kinda like oil
Phase IV)
Similarities in regulatory (NCP) language.
.Should result in similarities on how we
evaluate threats at facilities,,,,
6
evaluate the facility
7
because its not just about plugging wells in
the forest!!!
dont ignore the rest of the oil production
facility just to get to the well
8
Oil Production Facility Responsible Party
  • 40 CFR 112 all structures (wells, platforms,
    storage facilities, etc), piping (flowlines,
    gathering lines, etc) or equipment (workover
    equipment, separation equipment, gathering lines,
    and auxiliary non-transportation-related
    equipment) used in the production, extraction,
    recovery, lifting, stabilization or treating of
    oil, or associated storage or measurement, and
    located in a single geographical oil or gas field
    operated by a single operator.
  • Responsible Party owner(s) or operator(s) of the
    facility
  • Not necessarily OGM (rights) or landowner in the
    forest

9
Oil Production Facility Responsible Party
  • Lets look at a couple operating oil production
    facilities in the forest,
  • and identify the owner(s) and operator(s)..

10
(No Transcript)
11
Operating Oil Production Facility in the Forest
Identification of the owner or operator of the
facility and, in the event of an oil spill, the
Responsible Party (pretty straightforward)
12
Operating Oil Production Facility in the Forest
Identification of the owner or operator of the
facility and, in the event of an oil spill, the
Responsible Party (pretty straightforward)
13
Operating Oil Production Facility in the Forest
Identification of the owner or operator of the
facility and, in the event of an oil spill, the
Responsible Party (less straightforward)
14
Abandoned Oil Production Facility
  • Responsible Party of an abandoned facility is
    defined as those persons who would have been
    responsible parties owner(s) or operator(s)
    immediately prior to the abandonment of the
    facility.
  • recognizing the oil production facility could be
    difficult as a function of time or other factors
  • the PRP-search and RP identification could get
    complex, and in the NW PA oil patch, may involve
    interpreting information back to the 1800s, and
  • even be frustrating, fruitless, futile
  • .even if you have an old lease map

15
?
16
Bryner-Fox OPA Site
SPOC
Barcroft
T.T. Fox
Fox-Brawely
Bryner-Fox Roy
A.R. Fitch
H. F.A. Wile
Bryner-D. L. Carey
McCracken Farm
17
and do you really think vintage late 1800s or
even early 1900s abandoned Oil Production
Facility would look like this today?
18
vintage late -1800s early -1900s oil well
today North Fork OPA Site Mallory Van Scoy
19
vintage mid -1900s oil well today Johnston
Farm
20
OIL SPILL 101 - DEFINITIONS AND DETERMINATIONS
NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
DISCHARGE
SUBSTANTIAL THREAT OF DISCHARGE
21
Discharge
  • Discharge (as defined by OPA). Includes but not
    limited to any spilling, leaking, pumping,
    pouring, emitting, emptying, or dumping of oil
    into or on the navigable waters.
  • Federal Removal Authority (OPA) ensure
    effective and immediate removal of a discharge

22
Substantial Threat of Discharge
  • EPA definition
  • 40 CFR 112 requires SPCC Plan for any on-shore
    facility which due to its location could
    reasonably be expected to discharge oil in
    quantities that may be harmful.
  • Federal Removal Authority (OPA) mitigation or
    prevention of a substantial threat of a discharge

23
Substantial Threat (continued)
  • USCG definition
  • 33 CFR 154.1020 defines substantial threat of a
    discharge to mean any incident or condition
    involving a facility that may create a risk of
    discharge of oil. Such incidents include, but
    are not limited to storage tank or piping
    failures, above ground or underground leaks,
    fires, explosions, flooding, spills contained
    within the facility, or other similar
    occurrences.
  • Federal Removal Authority (OPA) mitigation or
    prevention of a substantial threat of a discharge

24
NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
  • Definitions can be found at FWPCA, CWA,
    OPA90, 40 CFR 300, 40 CFR 110, 40 CFR 112, 33
    CFR 153, etc.
  • Navigable waters.means waters of the United
    States, including the territorial seas.
    Includes
  • ? All waters that are currently used, were used
    in the past, or may be susceptible to use in
    interstate or foreign commerce, including all
    waters that are subject to ebb and flow of the
    tide
  • ? Interstate waters including interstate
    wetlands

25
NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
  • ? all other waters such as intrastate lakes,
    rivers, streams (including intermittent streams),
    mudflats, sandflats, and wetlands, the use,
    degradation, or destruction of which would affect
    or could affect interstate or foreign commerce
    including any such waters
  • i that are or could be used by interstate or
    foreign travelers for recreational or other
    purposes
  • ii from which fish or shellfish are or could
    be taken and sold in interstate or foreign
    commerce
  • iii that are used or could be used for
    industrial purposes by industries in interstate
    commerce

26
NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
  • ? all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as
    navigable waters under this section
  • ? tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs
    ? through ? of this definition, including
    wetlands
  • ? Wetlands adjacent to waters identified in
    paragraphs ? through ? of this definition
    provided that waste treatment systems (other than
    cooling ponds meeting the criteria of this
    paragraph) are not waters of the United States.

27
NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
  • Waters of the United States do not include prior
    converted cropland. Notwithstanding the
    determination of an areas status as prior
    converted cropland by any other federal agency,
    for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the
    final authority regarding Clean Water Act
    jurisdiction remains with EPA.

in other words, except where expressly
prohibited by law, connect the dots
28
WHILE ON VACATION WITH MY DAUGHTER THIS SUMMER.
I received a phone call from USDOJ
29
NEW DEFINITIONS WATERS OF THE UNITED
STATES WETLANDS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com