Title: The Transformation of the American Hospital
1The Transformation of the American Hospital
- James G. Anderson, Ph.D.
- Purdue University
2From Community Institution to Business
Organization
- Institutions are infused with values reflecting
community sentiments and goals. They also
perform a variety of social functions that are
viewed as important for the community. - Organizations represent rational instruments
designed to achieve definite goals judged on
technical criteria that can be modified or
discarded.
3Late 19th Century Hospitals
- Founded as institutions
- Concern for the poor
- Mutual assistance
- Volunteerism
- Community sponsorship
- Community service versus investor return
420th Century Hospitals
- Shift from donation of services to marketing
services - Financing expansion
- Profit-making activities
- Competition for paying patients
- Community orientation diminished
- Ascendance of organizational model
- Hospital mergers/closures
5 Institutions of Care (1750-1870)
- MDs donated their time
- Benefactors provided capital
- Hospital provided care vs. cure
- Rudimentary treatment available
6 Institutions of Care (1870-1919)
- Shift in demand and supply
- Industrialization
- Immigration
- Urbanization
- Family fragmentation
- Technology developments Antisepsis and
anesthesia - Risk of deaths in hospitals declined
- Middle class began paying for care
7 Institutions of Care (1870-1919)
- Number of hospitals increased from 138 to 4,359
- Number of hospital beds increased from 35,604 to
421,005. - white collar patients increased from 13 to
24. - paying patients increased from 14 to 38.
8 Institutions of Care (1870-1919)
- Mission changed from caring to curing.
- Patients became viewed as a source of income.
- Hospitals remained nonprofit and tax-exempt.
- Hospitals began to serve the broader community.
- Hospitals were founded by religious and ethnic
groups. - Shift in control of the hospital from lay
trustees to medical staff. - Majority of care shifted to private paying
patients.
9 Threats to the Institution (1930-1965) Major
changes
- The development of private health insurance.
- Growing government involvement in financing and
regulation. - Alteration in the institutional character of
hospitals.
10Private Insurance
- The depression resulted in the founding of Blue
Cross/Shield. They acted as third-party between
patients and providers. - Insurance plans were nonprofit.
- They did not interfere with clinical decisions.
- Free choice of hospitals by patients.
- Providers were reimbursed for charges on a
fee-for-service basis. - Community-based rating was used to set insurance
premiums.
11Private Insurance
- WWII wage/price controls encouraged employers to
offer health insurance benefits. - The supreme court ruled that the health insurance
was negotiable in collective bargaining. - The development of competition from commercial
insurance forced BlueCross/Blue Shield to abandon
community rating. - Insurance spurred higher utilization and cost.
12 Government Involvement Medicare/Medicaid 1965
- Increase the federal governments role to fill
gaps in private insurance. - Government provided capital for health services.
- Reimbursed physicians on a fee-for-service basis.
- Reimbursed hospitals on a retrospective cost-
reimbursement basis. - Provided higher payments for inpatient care.
- Provided incentives to expand facilities and
services.
13Effects of Government Involvement
- Health care inflation.
- Dependence on public funds.
- Reduction in philanthropy.
- Providers reduce charity care.
- Regulation increased.
- Hospitals expanded their managerial
responsibilities and staff. - Reemergence of for-profit hospitals.
14Institutional Crises 1965-1990
- Stagflation in the 1970s created a budget crisis.
- Spending on Medicare/Medicaid increased rapidly.
- Legal, budgetary, market remedies were proposed.
15Proposed Remedies
- Legal Goldfarb vs. Virginia State Bar ruled
antitrust laws apply to health care. - Budgetary DRGs changed the way hospitals are
reimbursed. - Market HMO Act 1973 provided capital for new
HMOs. - Managed care strategies by employers, Medicare,
Medicaid.
16Organizational Responses
- Hospital closures.
- Emphasis on commercial objectives.
- Abandonment of costly services, charity care.
- Early discharge of patients.
- Focus on profitable services.
- Corporate rationalization.
- Increased competition.
17Decline in Institutional Character
- Decline in community control.
- Decline in community legitimacy.
- Loss of philanthropic support.
- Decline in volunteerism.
- Increase in unions
- Providers lost initiative for assuring quality,
disciplining members. - Responsibility shifted to courts and payers.
18The Future of Hospitals
- As an institution hospitals served several
constituencies
(1) Local community (2) Sick
poor. (3) Sponsors who donated time and
money. (4) Work force drawn mainly from
community. - Hospitals now focus on serving those who pay for
health care. They have become organizations
19The Future of Hospitals
- As the hospital has pursued strategies to improve
the operating margin/bottom line, it has lost its
traditional legitimacy. - Revenue-generating strategies will not ensure the
hospitals survival in the future. - Various physician specialty groups have become
less dependent upon hospitals as a site of
practice. This has drawn patients away. - Hospitals have become large ICUs.
20Number and Types of Hospitals in the U.S.
- Total Number of All U.S. Registered Hospitals
5,764 - Number of U.S. Community Hospitals 4,895
- Number of Nongovernment Not-for-Profit Community
Hospitals 2,984 - Number of Investor-Owned (For-Profit) Community
Hospitals 790 - Number of State and Local Government Community
Hospitals 1,121
21The Changing Environment ofUS Hospitals
- Hospital industry of 1980s
- largely autonomous
- worried about government regulation and rate
setting - Hospital industry of 1990s
- losing power to managed care
- facing public and private payment constraints
- Hospital industry of 2000s
- largely consolidated but bifurcated some doing
- exceedingly well and others not
22Looking Back to 1980s What We Thought Would
Happen Paul Starr in The Social Transformation
of American Medicine (1982) described the future
of the hospital industry.
23Looking Back to 1980s WhatWe Thought Would
Happen
- Paul Starr in The Social Transformation of
American Medicine (1982) described the future of
the hospital industry.
24Pathways to Regional/ NationalHealth Care
Conglomerates
- Changes in hospital ownership to for-profit
- Horizontal integration through the development
- of multi-hospital systems
- Diversification and corporate restructuring
into - poly-corporate enterprises
- Vertical integration into HMOs
- Increased industry concentration of ownership
- and control
- Source
25Key Questions
- What came to pass and what did not in
- Starr predictions for hospital industry?
- What does this mean for the hospital
- industry and markets today?
- How has this affected hospital financial
- circumstances?
26Horizontal Integration ofHospitals
- Hospitals are increasingly part of
multihospital - arrangements
- 30.8 were in systems in 1979
- 53.6 were in systems in 2001 with an
- additional 12.7 in looser health networks
- However, systems are still predominantly
- non-profit and are local in focus
27Number and Types of Hospitals in the U.S.
- Number of Federal Government Hospitals 239
- Number of Nonfederal Psychiatric Hospitals 477
- Number of Nonfederal Long Term Care Hospitals 130
- Number of Hospital Units of Institutions (Prison
Hospitals, College Infirmaries, Etc.) 23
28Number and Types of Hospitals in the U.S.
- Number of Rural Community Hospitals 2,166
- Number of Urban Community Hospitals 2,729
- Number of Community Hospitals in a System
2,626 - Number of Community Hospitals in a
Network1,393
29Hospital Beds, Admissions and Expenses
- Total Staffed Beds in All U.S. Registered
Hospitals 965,256 - Staffed Beds in Community Hospitals 813,307
- Total Admissions in All U.S. Registered
Hospitals 36,610,535 - Admissions in Community Hospitals 34,782,742
- Total Expenses for All U.S. Registered Hospitals
498,103,754,000 - Expenses for Community Hospitals
450,124,257,000
30Trends in Ownership of Hospitals in the U.S.
31Hospital DiversificationPrediction
- Many predicted hospitals would get involved
- with several different health and non-health
- related ventures
- outpatient services such as dialysis
- nursing homes, retirement centers
- retail pharmacies
- durable medical equipment distributors
- hearing aid and eyeglass stores
- managing leasing medical office space
- management consulting services
- real estate management
32Hospital DiversificationReality
- Hospitals experimented but increasingly
- focused on services closely tied to traditional
- inpatient/outpatient care
- Hospitals added and dropped services largely
- depending on reimbursement opportunities
- Hospital strategy currently focuses on being a
- technology leader in a market not being a
- diversified corporation
- Vertical
33(No Transcript)
34Concentration of Ownershipand Control
- Prediction Multi-hospital systems would
- centralize not only ownership but control
- Starr believed that shift in locus of control
would - occur as national/regional systems formed
- Reality Research indicates
- most systems are local not regional or national
- about 70 of systems delegate certain
authorities to - affiliated hospitals
- substantial variability exists in mixture of
- centralized/decentralized control
35Why Were So ManyPredictions Wrong?
- Assumed pressures on hospitals would be
- unrelenting and uni-directional
- Did not consider increased ability of hospitals
to - fend off pressures as they consolidated
- Did not recognize extent of organizational
- inertia
- Did not recognize the importance of local
- connections
- Did not realize the resilience of non-profit
form - even in face of financial distress
36So What Does HospitalIndustry Look Like Now?
- Many hospitals are consolidated in local health
- systems or networks
- Systems and networks vary markedly in degree
- of centralized control
- at one extreme, parent organization establishes
all - policy and makes all key decisions
- at other extreme, system/network is basically a
- shell, perhaps centralized administrative
functions - and centralized capital financing
- A large minority of hospitals not involved,
either - by choice or because undesirable
37- Concentration of Ownership
- and Control
- Prediction Multi-hospital systems would
- centralize not only ownership but control
- Starr believed that shift in locus of control
would - occur as national/regional systems formed
- Reality Research indicates
- most systems are local not regional or national
- about 70 of systems delegate certain
authorities to - affiliated hospitals
- substantial variability exists in mixture of
- centralized/decentralized control
38(No Transcript)
39Reference
- L.R. Burns, The Transformation of the American
Hospital From Community Institution toward
Business Enterprise, in Comparative Social
Research, C. Calhoun (ed.), JAI
Press, Inc., Vol. 12 (1990), pp. 77-112.