Title: Texas Large Commercial and Industrial Standard Offer Program
1Texas Large Commercial and Industrial Standard
Offer Program
- Brown Bag Teleconference
- May 23, 2003
1
2Overview of Todays Topic
- Over 20 million in incentive funds remain
available for qualifying energy efficiency
projects through Texas Large Commercial and
Industrial Standard Offer Programs!
2
3Outline
- Brief overview
- Jay Zarnikau, Frontier Associates LLC
- Waltz Across Texas
- An Introduction to each of the service areas by
program managers at each of the utilities - Project Sponsor Eligibility
- Billy Berny, AEP
- Eligible Measures
- Doug Maxey, Xcel Energy
3
4Outline cont.
- Application Process
- George Smith, CenterPoint Energy
- Measurement and Verification
- Mike Stockard, Oncor
- Example Incentive Calculations
- Karen Radosevich, Entergy
4
55
April 2003
6Entergy - Gulf States, Inc.
Karen Radosevich
6
7Entergy - Gulf States, Inc.
- Serves 350,000 customers in Southeast Texas
- Industrial (Beaumont Port Arthur)
- Residential (The Woodlands Conroe)
- Goals and Budget
- Goal 2003 Budget Remaining Funds
- 3.1 MW 1,305,940 1,239,549
- Contact Information Terry Swan (409)
981-3245 tswan_at_entergy.com
7
8Xcel Energy
Doug Maxey
8
9Xcel Energy
- Serve 269,000 customers on the high plains of
Texas - Amarillo - Lubbock
- Goals and Budget
- Goal 2003 Budget Remaining Funds
- 3.1 MW 1,305,940 1,239,549
- Contact Information 806-378-2887
doug.maxey_at_xcelenergy.com
9
10Texas-New Mexico Power
Tony Thompson
10
11Texas-New Mexico Power Goals and Budgets
Goal 2003 Budget Remaining Funds 0.64
MW 240,000 192,000 Contact
Information 817-377-5579 tthompson_at_tnpe.com
11
12AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
Billy Berny
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
AEP SWEPCO
AEP TEXAS CENTRAL
AEP TEXAS NORTH
12
13American Electric Power Program Incentive Budgets
- Total Incentive Budget Available Funds
as of April 28, 2003 - based on approved Contracts
- AEP - Texas Central
2,587,279
2,083,621 - AEP SWEPCO 589,500
589,500 - AEP - Texas North 596,841
596,841 - 3,773,620
3,269,962 - Contact Information 325-674-7293
bgberny_at_aep.com
FOR MORE INFO...
Go to www.aepefficiency.com for program details
and application procedures.
13
14CenterPoint Energy
George Smith
14
15CenterPoint Energy Statistics
- Houston metropolitan area
- 1.8 million customers
- System peak demand of 15,000 MW
- Cities Houston, Galveston, Baytown,
Richmond/Rosenberg - Load is 40 residential, 30 commercial, 30
industrial
15
16CenterPoint Goals and Budgets
Goal 2003 Budget Remaining Funds 10.2
MW 6,252,000 2,600,000 Contact
Information 713-207-3488 george.smith_at_centerpo
intenergy.com
16
17Oncor
Mike Stockard
17
18Oncor Service Area Statistics
- Provides distribution service to 2.64 million
premises. - Provides distribution service to 370 cities in 92
counties. - Serves Dallas, Fort Worth, Tyler, Waco, Midland,
Odessa, Lufkin, Temple, Round Rock - Peak system demand of 22,000 MW
- 2004 Incentive Budget - 17.3 million
- Contact Information 214-486-5626
mstocka1_at_oncorgroup.com
18
19Websites for Specific Utilities
- AEP - www.aepefficiency.com
- Entergy - www.ENTERGYefficiency.com
- Oncor - www.oncorgroup.com/efficiency
- CenterPoint - centerpointefficiency.com
- Texas-New Mexico Power - www.tnpeefficiency.com
- Xcel Energy - www.Xcelenergyefficiency.com
19
20Quick Overview
Jay Zarnikau
Frontier Associates LLC
20
21Background and Introduction
- Texas Senate Bill 7 requires distribution
utilities in Texas to meet 107 of their
load growth by offering and administering energy
efficiency programs. - Each of the States affected distribution
utilities offer a Large Commercial and Industrial
Standard Offer Program to help satisfy this goal. - The legislation requires incentive programs to be
market neutral and non-discriminatory, so the CI
Standard Offer Program is available to all of the
utilities distribution customers on a first
come, first served basis.
21
22Standard Offer Program
- Program administrator (electric utility) offers
set incentive payment to participants for each
kWh or kW saved through installation and
operation of an energy efficiency measure. - Program administrator signs a standard contract
with participants outlining their
responsibilities under the program. - Applications considered on per-project basis
first-come, first-served. - Number of participants limited only by available
incentive dollars. - Project Sponsor and customer determines
efficiency measures to be installedprogram
measure/technology neutral. - Contact Information 512-372-8778
jayz_at_frontierassoc.com
22
23Project Sponsor Eligibility
Billy Berny
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
AEP SWEPCO
AEP TEXAS CENTRAL
AEP TEXAS NORTH
23
24Program Administrator (Utility) Responsibilities
- Perform outreach to energy services community.
- Review project applications.
- Sign contracts with Project Sponsors.
- Perform pre- and post-installation inspections.
- Make incentive payments to project sponsors.
- Report results to Public Utility Commission.
24
25Who Can Be a Project Sponsor?
- Equipment distributors or manufacturers
- Energy service companies
- Community based organizations
- Mechanical or lighting contractors
- Any other entity providing energy efficiency
services - Large commercial or industrial energy consumers
- Project sponsors must meet standard
qualifications (work experience, financial
capability, insurance, proper licensing, etc.)
25
26Sponsor Responsibilities
- Market and sign contracts with individual Utility
transmission and distribution customers - Apply for funding from program
- Sign Standard Agreement with Utility
- Design, procure, and install energy efficiency
measures - Measure and verify energy savings
26
27Project Sponsor Qualifications
- Participants must have the following
- Evidence of good credit rating
(10K or Financial Statement) - List of references
- Must hold all applicable licenses
- Evidence of all building permits
- Evidence of necessary insurance
27
28Eligible Measures
Doug Maxey
28
29Measure Eligibility
- Produces measurable demand and energy savings
- Retrofit measures, in most cases
- Useful life is greater than ten years
- Permanently installed
- Fuel switching from electric to non-electric only
- Exceeds minimum efficiency standards
29
30Eligible Measures
- Constant air volume to VAV conversion
- Chiller replacement
- Packaged cooling unit replacement
- Fan and pump VSD and efficiency projects
- Lighting efficiency and controls
- Air cooling and refrigeration compressor projects
- Industrial process measures
30
31Ineligible Measures
- Measures with life less than 10 years
- Removable measures (generally includes plug
loads) - Exterior lighting
- Cogeneration or self generation (except
renewables) - Fuel switching to electric
- New construction (some exceptions)
- Measures that require no capital investment
- Measures that receive incentives from other
Utility programs - Thermal energy storage (unless part of a larger
project)
31
32Project Eligibility
- Project requirements
- Utility TD customers
- Total demand at project site(s) is at least 100
kW - Minimum savings per project
- 20 kW
- Similar customers/sites may be aggregated to meet
this requirement
32
33Project Aggregation
- Any number of project sites may be submitted as a
project if they are similar. Contingent on
having the same - Sponsor
- Measure
- Occupancy schedule
- Functional use
- Energy consumption patterns
- MV Plan
33
34Application Process
George Smith
34
35Initial Application
- Sponsor submits one Initial Application (IA) per
project - First IA includes Sponsor qualifications
- Identifies customers and intended measures (20
kW savings minimum) - Estimated kW/kWh savings and incentive payments
- Approximately 15 day review period
- Utility reviews the IA for participant and
measure eligibility - Upon IA approval, Utility reserves funds for the
project for a limited time.
35
36Submittal 2Final Application
- Sponsor has up to 100 days from IA approval for
submittal of FA (varies by utility) - Information required in the Final Application
(FA) - Detailed project description
- Savings calculations and incentive estimates
- Equipment surveys (use standard forms)
- Proposed MV plan
- Site plan and 1-line drawings where applicable
- Agreement between Project Sponsor and Host
Customer
36
37Final Application (cont.)
- One FA submitted per project
- FA forms available on Web site
- Utility reviews each FA
- Fulfillment of submittal requirements
- Technical review of measure savings and MV plan
- Utility conducts a pre-installation inspection
- Approximately 45 day review
- FA approval
37
38Agreement(Contract)
- Includes project specific information
- Estimated kW kWh savings and incentives
- Approved MV plan
- Security deposit may be required
- Installation of approved measures may proceed
after FA approval, after both parties sign the
CI SOP Agreement, and pre-installation
inspection is completed
38
39Submittal 3 Installation Report
- Due within 30 days of completion for all projects
- Submitted information similar to FA, except
- Reports actual retrofit equipment installed
- Updates savings calculations, incentive
estimates and MV Plan to reflect as-built
condition - Includes Host Customer certification that
measures were indeed installed
39
40Installation Report (cont.)
- Utility reviews each Installation Report (IR)
- Review of final savings estimates and MV plan
- Post-installation inspection to confirm equipment
installation - Approximately 45 day review period
- Upon IR approval, Utility pays Project Sponsor
40 of contracted incentive
40
41Submittal 4Savings Report
- Submitted after MV activities completed
- Provides actual project kW kWh savings
- Submittal will include
- Raw data collected in MV activities
- Analysis used to calculate savings
- Actual savings achieved
- Review period approximately 45 days
- Remaining incentive payment based on actual
savings achieved (up to 60 of contracted amount)
IA
FA
Contract
IR
SR
41
42Measurement and Verification
Mike Stockard
42
43Streamlined MV Procedures
- Measure-specific MV guidelines
- Stipulated values for data such as operating
hours, fixture wattages and equipment
efficiencies - Pre-derived savings calculations for some
measures - Minimize project sponsor MV costs and utility
administration, while producing justifiable
energy savings
43
44CI Program MV
- Appropriate MV Approach depends mainly on
- Type of retrofit and equipment
- Operational predictability
- Project complexity
- Main categories of MV for CI program
- Deemed savings (in select applications)
- Simplified MV methods
- Full MV methods
- Alternate MV methods may be proposed by Sponsor,
but must adhere to IPMVP and be approved by
Utility
44
45Simplified Lighting Example
- Typical Small Office Building
- Sponsor submits full lighting survey, detailing
existing and proposed fixtures - 3,760 stipulated operating hours for office
buildings - 80 coincidence factor for office buildings
45
46Simplified Lighting Example (cont.)
- Savings Calculations
- Lighting Demand Savings 38.6 kW 18.7 kW
19.9 kW - Interactive Demand Savings 19.9 kW 0.10
2.0 kW - Total Demand Savings (19.9 kW 2.0 kW) 0.80
17.7 kW - Lighting Energy Savings 19.9 kW 3,760 hrs
74,824 kWh - Interactive Energy Savings 74,824 kWh 0.05
3,741 kWh - Total Demand Savings 74,824 kWh 3,741 kWh
78,565 kWh
46
47Simplified Cooling Example
- Chiller Replacement in Office Building
Retrofit Description 1-for-1 300 Ton Water-Cooled Centrifugal Chiller Replacement
Existing Chiller Efficiency COP5.0 (0.70 kW/ton)
New Chiller Efficiency COP6.6 (0.53 kW/ton)
Baseline Chiller Efficiency (ASHRAE 90.1-1989) COP5.2 (0.68 kW/ton)
Spot kW measurement of existing chiller at peak conditions 135 kW
12-months post-retrofit measured chiller kWh 334,200 kWh
47
48Simplified Cooling Example (cont.)
48
49General MV Rules
- Baseline must account for minimum state and
federal standards - Standard forms must be used
- MV reports must be complete and properly
documented before any payments will be made - Service quality must be maintained
- For example - lighting levels
- Metering
- Calibration required
- All collected data must be submitted with reports
- Must be adequate to capture full range of
operating conditions
49
50Example Incentive Calculations
Karen Radosevich
50
51Pricing for programs is based on a cost
effectiveness standard
- Based on avoided cost of a new gas turbine
- 400 per kW capacity
- 2.5 cents per kWh off-peak energy
- Incentives for large commercial and industrial
projects can be up to 35 of avoided cost. - Incentives vary by utility
- 150 to 200 per kW reduction
- 5.0 to 6.9 cents per annual kWh saved
- Lighting Cap -- kW and kWh savings derived from
lighting measures are capped at 65 of the total
savings. - Load Factor Cap -- Utilities may place a limit on
the ratio of kWh payment to kW payment.
51
52Example 1 - Simple Calculation
A commercial HVAC project saves 25 kW of summer
peak demand and 50,000 annual kWh. 25 kW x
175/kW 50,000 kWh x 0.06/kWh 7,375
52
53Example 2 -- Load Factor Cap
An industrial variable-speed motor retrofit saves
20 kW of summer peak demand and 150,000 annual
kWh. The unadjusted incentive payment for this
project would be (20 x175) (150,000 x 0.06)
12,500 The utility is utilizing a load factor
cap that limits combined kW and kWh payment to
600 per kW. 20 x 600 12,000 This project
would be subject to the load factor cap.
Incentive would not exceed 12,000.
53
54Example 3 - Lighting Cap
A commercial office project saves 15 kW and
60,000 kWh from lighting measures and 4 kW and
8,000 from HVAC. of kW savings from lighting
15/19 79 of kWh savings from lighting
60,000/68,00088 Adjusted kW (19 x 0.65) 4
16.35 kW Adjusted kWh (68,000 x 0.65) 8,000
52,200 kWh (16.35 x 175) (52,200 x 0.06)
5,993
54
55In conclusion
- A new generation of energy efficiency programs
are up and running. - For energy services companies, equipment
distributors and manufacturers, installers of
energy-efficient equipment, and others, these
programs provide new business opportunities. - The states utilities and the PUCT are counting
on your ideas and efforts to help ensure that we
meet our goal for energy efficiency!
55
56Questions?
56