QUESTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

QUESTIONS

Description:

Comment ? [Hint:- ICAI, compendium of opinions, Volume I, Edition IIIrd, 1986, Page 189, says that the only method for appointment of Ist auditor is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Lal27
Category:
Tags: questions | icai

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: QUESTIONS


1
QUESTIONS
  • Miss Ani is a CA from the institute of
    England Wales. Whether she can be
    appointed as an auditor of Indian company ?

    Hint- No, as per section
    226(1)(2)
  • Whether director can become auditor of the same
    company ? Hint- No, as per section 226(3)
  • Whether relative of director can be appointed as
    auditor of the company ?

    Hint- 1. Yes, as per section 226(3)
  • 2. But in case of near
    relationship with director, if
  • member is off the
    view that his independence
  • would be effected then
    in the best interest of
  • tradition of
    profession he shall refrain from
  • accepting the post of
    auditor in the company.

2
  • Whether tax auditor can be appointed as company
    auditor ? Hint- If person is consultant
    professionally on income tax matters, he
    cannot be said an officer or employee of
    the company
  • Whether internal auditor can be appointed
    as auditor of company ?

    Hint- 1. Where he is an employee of the
    company than
  • considering section
    226(3) he cannot be appointed
  • as auditor of the company.

  • 2. Where an outsider is
    appointed as companies
  • internal auditor
    even than he cannot be
  • appointed as auditor of
    the company since it is not
  • possible for him to give
    an objective independent
  • opinion on section 227(4A)
    clause (iv).

3
  • Whether auditor can recover audit fees on
    progressive basis ? Hint- An auditor can
    recover progressive fee only in accordance
    with resolution passes in general
    meeting, therefore he cannot be said to be
    indebted of the company.
  • Mr A has completed 30 of total audit worked
    assigned to him. He recovered 30 of audit fees
    after completion of such work. Whether he is
    indebted to the company ?
  • Mr A has taken loan amounting Rs. 1001 from
    company in which he is auditor, whether he is
    disqualified. If he had taken amount to meet
    traveling expanses, whether disqualification
    will incur ?
    Hint- 1. Yes, as
    per section 226(3).
  • 2. If auditor has
    commenced his work than
  • demanded for traveling
    Advance, he will not be
  • indebted to the
    company. However if he had not
  • commenced his work,
    position may be different.

4
  • Mr A is named in Article of Association
    as 1st Auditor. Comment ?

    Hint- ICAI, compendium of opinions, Volume I,
    Edition IIIrd, 1986, Page 189, says that the only
    method for appointment of Ist auditor is layed
    down under section 224(5), and he cannot be
    appointed mearly because his name is
    specified in MOM/AOA.
  • Mr A is appointed as auditor at AGM held in
    2001. no AGMs were held in 2002 2003. Mr A
    contends that he continues to be an auditor for
    2002 2003. comment ? Hint-
    The auditor in the company holds the
    office from conclusion of AGM in which he is
    appointed till the conclusion of next AGM.
    Hence, he will continue as an auditor for 2002
    2003.

5
  • XYZ Co. firm of CA was appointed as
    auditor in PQR Ltd. After some time one partner
    died one new partner is added in the firm.
    Whether it is a casual vacancy in company PQR
    Ltd.
    Hint- Addition
    or death of any partner amounts to
    reconstitution of the firm not the
    dissolution of the firm. Hence, firm will
    continue to act as auditor in PQR ltd.
  • A nationalized bank holds 26 subscribed
    share capital of company XYZ. Auditor of xyz
    is appointed by passing OR. comment ?

    Hint- 1. As per section 224A auditor
    should be appointed by
  • passing SR and as OR
    is passed appointment of
  • auditor is not valid.
  • 2. In the present case
    section 224(3) would be
  • attracted company
    would require to give notice
  • of the fact to CG
    within 7 days on receipt of
  • notice auditor shall be
    appointed by CG.

6
  • Company XYZ a nationalized bank holds 23
    shares on date of Notice of AGM till the date
    of AGM NB increased his share holding by 3
    becoming 26 of share capital. Will the
    auditor appointed by passing OR or SR.
    Hint- 1. Date of recording
    share holding pattern for the
  • purpose of section 224A
    is the date of AGM not
  • the date of notice.
  • 2. In present situation
    company has 2 alternatives-
  • (I) Adjourn the meeting
    give fresh notice as may
  • be required by the law
    appoint the auditor by
  • passing SR.
  • (II) Passing over the
    item of agenda of
  • appointment of an
    auditor. In this case no auditor
  • is appointed by the
    company therefore 224(3)
  • will be attracted
    company would be required to
  • give notice of the fact
    to CG within 7 days on
  • receipt of notice auditor
    shall be appointed by CG.

7
  • A firm having audits of 12 public
    companies 20 private companies ?
  • Hint- As per companies act compliance
  • As per ICAI notification non
    compliance
  • A firm having audits of 21 public
    companies 9 private companies ?
  • Hint- As per companies act non
    compliance
  • As per ICAI notification
    compliance
  • Note- Non observance of this
    ceiling would amount to
  • professional misconduct.

8
  • M/S PQR is a chartered accountant firm having 3
    partners P,Q Rs Mr. R is an whole time
    employment some where else. Currently firm is
    holding 37 audits including audit of foreign
    company. Following proposals are before firm-
  • 1 public company his 60 branches
  • Audit of section 25 company
  • 1 cost audit
  • 1 audit of government company
  • 1 audit of private company 30 of its branches.
  • Advice whether firm can except all the
    audits.
  • Hint- 1. section 224(1B) places a ceiling on
    no. of audits, which is
  • referred as specifies no.
    specified no. is 20 in present
  • case firm is having 3 partners
    1 partner is in full time
  • employment some where else,
    there fore firm can
  • validity hold 40 audits.

9
  • 2. Analysis conclusion
  • If firm accepts audit of 1 public company
    60 of its branches it should be included as
    1 audit when computing total no. of audits.
  • If firm accepts audit of section 25 company,
    it should be included in the limit when
    computing total no. of audit.
  • If cost audit is accepted by the firm, it
    should be included in the overall limit.
  • If firm accepts audit of government company, it
    should be included in the limit when computing
    total no of audits.
  • If firm accepts audit of private company
    30 of its branches, it should not be
    excluded in the overall limit.
  • If firm accepts all the audit, total no.
    of audits will be 40, which is within the
    limit specifies under section 224(1B)
    hence firm can accept all the audits.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com