Title: Audit and Compliance
1 Audit and Compliance
2Audit and Compliance Whats it all about ..
- Audit is defined as an official examination and
verification of accounts and records, especially
of financial accounts. - Compliance is defined as a state in which
someone or something is in accordance with
established guidelines, specifications, or
legislation - So what does this mean for HIM professionals
- We need to perform our duties while adhering to
established guidelines and specifications as laid
our by our governing bodies .. - State Federal.. And Association
3Compliance
- Following established Federal Guidelines UHDDS
- Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set
- The UHDDS definitions are used by acute care
short-term hospitals to report inpatient data
elements in a standardized manner. These data
elements and their definitions can be found in
the July 31, 1985, Federal Register (Vol. 50, No,
147), pp. 31038-40. - There are a total of 42 possible elements of a
UHDDS form. First are basic demographic elements,
such as age, gender, ethnicity, marital status
and education levels. Another set has to do with
the hospital or health facility, including
patient numbering systems, type of facility and
assigned doctor or nurse. Finally, complete
information about the reason for the patient
coming to the hospital is recorded, including
self-reported diagnosis, physician diagnosis,
services rendered by the facility and dates of
all procedures.
4UHDDS Definitions
- Inpatient diagnoses and procedures shall be coded
in accordance with Uniform Hospital Discharge
Data Set (UHDDS) definitions for principal and
additional diagnoses and procedures as specified
in the Official Guidelines for Coding and
Reporting. - The principal diagnosis is defined in the UHDDS
as, that condition established after study to be
chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission
of the patient to the hospital for care.
5Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- CODES FOR SYMPTOMS,SIGNS, AND ILL-DEFINED
CONDITIONS - Codes for symptoms,signs and ill-defined
conditions from Chapter 16 are not to be used as
a principal diagnosis when a related definitive
diagnosis has been established. - TWO -OR- MORE INTERRELATED CONDITIONS, EACH
POTENTIALLY MEETING THE DEFINITION FOR PRINCIPAL
DIAGNOSIS - When there are two or more interrelated
conditions (such as a disease in the same
ICD-9chapter manifestations characteristically
associated with a certain disease) potentially
meeting the definition of principal diagnosis,
either condition may be sequenced first, unless
the circumstances of the admission, the therapy
provided, the Tabular List, or the Alphabetic
Index indicate otherwise.
6Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- TWO OR MORE DIAGNOSIS THAT EQUALLY MEET THE
DEFINITION FOR PRINCIPAL DIAGNOSIS. - In the unusual instance when two or more
diagnoses equally meet the criteria for principal
diagnosis as determined by the circumstances of
admission, diagnostic workup and/or therapy
provided, and the Alphabetic Index, Tabular List,
or another coding guideline does not provide
sequencing direction, any one of the diagnoses
may be sequenced first.
7Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- COMPARATIVE -OR- CONTRASTING CONDITIONS.
- In those rare instances when two or more
contrasting or comparative diagnoses are
documented as "either/or" (or similar
terminology), they are coded as if the diagnoses
were confirmed and the diagnoses are sequenced
according to the circumstances of the admission.
If no further determination can be made as to
which diagnosis should be principal, either
diagnosis may be sequenced first. - SYMPTOMS(s) FOLLOWED BY CONTRASTING/COMPARATIVE
DIAGNOSIS. - When a symptom(s) is followed by
contrasting/comparative diagnoses, the symptom
code is sequenced first. All the
contrasting/comparative diagnoses should be coded
as additional diagnoses.
8Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- ORIGINAL TREATMENT PLAN "NOT" CARRIED OUT.
- Sequence as the principal diagnosis the
condition, which after study occasioned the
admission to the hospital, even though treatment
may not have been carried out due to unforeseen
circumstances. - COMPLICATIONS OF SURGERY AND OTHER MEDICAL CARE.
- When the admission is for treatment of a
complication resulting from surgery or other
medical care, the complication code is sequenced
as the principal diagnosis. If the complication
is classified to the 996-999 series and the code
lacks the necessary specificity in describing the
complication, an additional code for the specific
complication should be assigned.
9Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- UNCERTAIN DIAGNOSIS
- If the diagnosis documented at the time of
discharge is qualified as "probable",
"suspected", "likely", "questionable",
"possible", or "still to be ruled our", or other
similar terms indicating uncertainty, code the
condition as if it existed or was established.
NOTE This guideline is applicable only to
inpatient admissions to short term, acute,
long-term care and psychiatric hospitals.
10Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- ADMISSION FROM OBSERVATION UNIT
- 1. Admission Following Medical ObservationWhen
a patient is admitted to an observation unit for
a medical condition, which either worsens or does
not improve, and is subsequently admitted as an
inpatient of the same hospital for this same
medical condition, the principal diagnosis would
be the medical condition which led to the
hospital admission. 2. Admission Following
Post-Operative ObservationWhen a patient is
admitted to an observation unit to "monitor" a
condition (or complication) that develops
following outpatient surgery, and then is
subsequently admitted as an inpatient of the same
hospital, hospitals should apply the Uniform
Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) definition of
principal diagnosis as that condition
established after study to be chiefly responsible
for occasioning the admission of the patient to
the hospital for care."
11Selection of Principal Diagnosis
- ADMISSION FROM OUTPATIENT SURGERY
- When a patient receives surgery in the hospital's
outpatient surgery department and is subsequently
admitted for continuing inpatient care at the
same hospital, the following guidelines should be
followed in selecting the principal diagnosis for
the impatient admission. - If the reason for the inpatient admission is a
complication, assign the complication as the
principal diagnosis. - If no complication, or other condition, is
documented as the reason for the inpatient
admission, assign the reason for the outpatient
surgery as the principal diagnosis. - If the reason for the inpatient admission is
another condition unrelated to the surgery,
assign the unrelated condition a s the principal
diagnosis.
12REPORTING ADDITIONAL DIAGNOSIS
- For reporting purposes the definition for other
diagnoses is interpreted as additional
conditions that affect patient care in terms of
requiringclinical evaluation ortherapeutic
treatment ordiagnostic procedures orextended
length of hospital stay. orincreased nursing
care and/or monitoring.The UHDDS defines "other
diagnosis" as "all conditions that coexist at the
time of admission, that develop subsequently, or
that affect the treatment received an/or the
length of stay. Diagnosis that relate to an
earlier episode which have no bearing on the
current hospital stay are to be excluded." UHDDS
definitions apply to inpatients in acute care,
short-term, long term care and psychiatric
hospital setting. The UHDDS definitions are used
by acute care short-term hospitals to report
impatient data elements in a standard manner.
13REPORTING ADDITIONAL DIAGNOSES
- The following guidelines are to be applied in
designating there diagnoses when neither the
Alphabetic Index nor the Tabular List in the
ICD-9-CM provide direction. The listing of the
diagnosis in the patient record is the
responsibility of the attending provider.A.
Previous conditionIf the provider has included
a diagnosis in the final diagnostic statement,
such as the discharge summary or the face sheet,
it should ordinarily be coded. Some providers
include in the diagnostic statement resolved
conditions or diagnoses and status-post
procedures from previous admission that have no
bearing on the current stay. Such conditions are
not to be reported and are coded only if required
by hospital policy.However, history codes
(V10-19) may be used as secondary codes if the
historical condition or family history has an
impact on current care or influences treatment.
14ABNORMAL FINDINGS
- Abnormal findings (laboratory, x-ray,pathologic,
and other diagnostic results) are not coded an
reported unless the provider indicates their
clinical significance. If the findings are
outside the normal range and the attending
provider has ordered other tests to evaluate the
condition or prescribed treatment, it is
appropriate to ask the provider whether the
abnormal finding should be added.
15UNCERTAIN DIAGNOSIS
- If the diagnosis documented at the time of
discharge is qualified as "probable",
"suspected", "likely", "questionable",
"possible", or "still to be ruled out" or other
similar terms indicating uncertainty, code the
condition as ...IF IT EXISTED -OR- WAS
ESTABLISHED. NOTE This guideline is only
applicable to inpatient admissions to short-term,
acute, long-term care, and psychiatric hospitals.
16Procedures
- In accordance with UHDDS definitions, all
significant procedures are to be reported. - A significant procedure is one that is (1)
surgical in nature, or (2) carries a procedural
risk, or (3) carries an anesthetic risk, or (4)
requires specialized training. - When more than one procedure is reported, the
principal procedure is to be designated. In
determining which of several procedures is
principal, the following criteria apply - The principal procedure is one that was performed
for definitive treatment rather than one
performed for diagnostic or exploratory purposes,
or was necessary to take care of a complication. - If there appears to be two procedures that are
principal, then the one most related to the
principal diagnosis should be selected as the
principal procedure.
17UHDDS Definitions - continued
- Reportable Diagnoses/Procedures. To achieve
consistency in the coding of diagnoses and
procedures, all individuals who are authorized to
perform coding/claims processing of inpatient
services (Coding Personnel) must - Thoroughly review the entire medical record as
part of the coding process in order to assign and
report the most appropriate codes. - Adhere to all official coding guidelines as
approved by AHA, AHIMA, CMS and NCHS
(Cooperating Parties). - Observe sequencing rules identified by
Cooperating Parties. - Assign and report codes, without physician
consultation/query, for diagnoses and procedures
that are not listed in the physicians final
diagnostic statement only if those diagnoses and
procedures are specifically documented in the
body of the medical record by a physician
directly participating in the care of the
patient, and this documentation is clear and
consistent
18UHDDS Definitions - continued
- Reportable Diagnoses/Procedures
- Areas of the medical record which contain
acceptable physician documentation to support
code assignment include the discharge summary,
history and physical, emergency room record,
physician progress notes, physician orders,
physician consultations, operative reports,
physician notations of intraoperative occurrences
and other ancillary, diagnostic reports signed by
physicians (such as anesthesia report, pathology
report) - When diagnoses or procedures are stated in other
medical record documentation by non-physicians
(nurses notes, MDS abstract (SNUs), pathology
report, radiology reports, laboratory reports,
EKGs, nutritional evaluation and other ancillary
reports), the attending physician must be queried
for confirmation of the condition. These
conditions must also meet the coding and
reporting guidelines outlined in AHA Coding
Clinic, 2Q, 1990 page 12.
19UHDDS Definitions - continued
- Reportable Diagnoses/Procedures
- Utilize medical record documentation to provide
specificity in coding, such as utilizing the
radiology report to confirm the fracture site or
referring to the EKG to identify the location of
an MI. - Consult the physician for clarification when
conflicting or ambiguous documentation is
present. Ask the physician to add information to
the record before assigning a code that is not
supported by documentation
20Query Process
- Coding Personnel should query the physician once
a diagnosis or procedure has been determined to
meet the guidelines for reporting but has not
been clearly or completely stated within the
medical record by a physician participating in
the care of the patient or when ambiguous or
conflicting documentation is present. - All facilities should educate their physicians
on the importance of concurrent documentation
within the body of the medical record to support
complete, accurate and consistent coding.
21Query Process
- Communication should be provided to the medical
staff that individuals responsible for coding
patient diagnoses or procedures will query
physicians when there are questions regarding
documentation for code assignment. The
physicians response to the query should be
signed by the physician and become part of the
medical record. The facility itself should
determine if the actual coding query will be
maintained as part of the medical record. - Coding Personnel must not suggest a code or
medical record documentation that is not
supported by the patients clinical presentation
and/or condition. Coding Personnel may relate to
physicians what the particular documentation
requirements are for specific codes, and the
physician can then make the appropriate
documentation decision based upon the patients
clinical presentation and/or condition.
22Data Quality Application
- Coding Personnel must not
- Add diagnosis codes solely based on test results,
unless diagnosis is obtained from physician
through the query process. - Misrepresent the patients clinical picture
through incorrect coding or adding
diagnosis/procedures unsupported by the
documentation for any reason. - Report diagnoses and procedures that the
physician has specifically indicated he/she does
not support.
23Facility Coding Reviews Audit findings
- Internal (or external) coding quality reviews
must be completed on a regular basis by each
facility. - Reviews should include review of the medical
record to determine accurate code assignment with
subsequent comparison with the UB-04 claim form
to determine accurate billing. - Findings from these reviews must be utilized to
improve coding and medical record documentation
practices and for Coding Personnel and physician
education, as appropriate.
24Questions ..