Title: Development and the Process of Constitutionalization
1Development and the Process of Constitutionalizati
on
- Eric BrousseauEconomiX, Université de Paris X
- Yves Schemeil,PACTE, IEP Grenoble IUF
- Jérôme Sgard,CERI/Sciences-Po
2Institutional Framework and the Process of
DevelopmentNorth, Wallis, Weingast, 2006
- Constitution as pact within the elite or
Specialists in violence - Civil peace allows economic activity
- Multi-tier Rent sharing pact (Specialist in
violence / Technocrats / Masses) - Limits reliance on violence, unless the order
collapses - Meets participation constraints
Society Limited Access Open Access
State Individual rights Competition Organizations Political Compet. Natural Personal Closed Accessible to elite Winner takes all (Liberal) Impersonal Open Accessible to all Checks and Balances
3The Question of Transition
- Doorstep conditions between Limited and Open
Access - Permanent risk of drift back to violence and
insecurity, due i.a. to winner-take-all pattern - vs. progressive rise in the rule of law within
the elite and possibly in other social sectors - Clear analysis of the stability of alternative
orders, but - Process of transition ?
- Logic of self-organization of alternative orders
?
4Our (small) addition
- An agent-based analytical framework that
emphasizes the interaction between the rulers and
the governed - Delegation as contractual transaction the
opposition between strong (or public) and weak
(or private) delegations -
5Our (small) addition
- An agent-based analytical framework that
emphasizes the interaction between the rulers and
the governed - Delegation as contractual transaction the
opposition between strong (or public) and weak
(or private) delegations - gt Strong anchor in the division of labor,
social and economic - gt Easier comparison of trajectories or
scenarios
6Development of the presentation
- An analytic framework
- Two illustrations, in the very long and very
short run - How the on-going bargain between rulers and
governed can account for differentiated
development trajectories
7Bounded vs. Constitutional Regulators
7
- Weak/ Bounded Delegation by Stakeholders
- Competitive incentives to build and defend club
goods - Enforcement capabilities based on adhesion and
easy exit - Strong/ Constitutional Delegation by Citizens
- Comprehensive, complex, costly to exit
- Capacity to build/design collective interest
- Monopoly of legitimate violence
8Bounded vs. Constitutional Regulators
- Weak/ Bounded Delegation by Stakeholders
- Competitive incentives to build and defend club
goods - Enforcement capabilities based on adhesion and
easy exit - Strong/ Constitutional Delegation by Citizens
- Comprehensive, complex, costly to exit
- Capacity to build/design collective interest
- Monopoly of legitimate violence
- gt Risk of extortion and coercion
- gt Possible demand for reverse-commitments by the
rulers
9Two Models of Constitution
9
- Despotic
- The distribution of rights is unequal gt
Inequalities are cumulative and constestability
is low - gt Weak legitimacy implies that the common
interest is narrow - Local communities provide most public goods gt
Persistence of traditional solidarities social
fragmentation - gt Limited political and economic
integration - gt Bounded growth for both public and private
goods
10Two Models of Constitution
- Despotic
- The distribution of rights is unequal
- Local communities provide most public goods
- Liberal
- Equal constitutional rights gt Rule of law AND
hierarchy of norms (topped by a Supreme court) - gt Political participation AND economic
integration - gt Dynamics of rights (legalization) AND
Constitutionalization - Skilled and Neutral State Organizations as
ultimate providers of public goods - gt Increasing provision of public goods market
infrastr. and solidarities - gt Optimal federalism and public/private
provision - gt Growth-and-legitimacy loop
11Constitutionalization in Very Long Run
Antique Empires
21st Century Globalisation
Migrant Tribes
External competition
Feudal Kingdoms
Post-WW II Welfare States, cum trade integration
Absolutist/ Mercantilist States
Early 19th Century, Liberal States
Internal competition
high
Westphalian constitutional pact
First amendment
Second amendment
Constitution of the world ?
The Consistency of Social Contracts Regimes
12Constitutionalization in the very short run the
blue blood reformers (1985-2005)
12
- Hobbesian reforms
- The state endows agents with hard, limited,
revolutionary economic (sometimes politic)
rights - gt e.g. privatization, free enterprise,
flexible labor, trade lib, etc - The Libertarian state
- Market institutions are demanding gt e.g.
Central banks, banking supervision, anti-trust,
non-tariff barriers, etc - The Policy-making state
- New public goods in the post-WashC era gt
Education, Poverty reduction, Health, Environment
13The Constitutional bargain
13
- Citizens
- The dynamics of equal rights the
growth-and-legitimacy loop. - The citizens consent to support the state
depends on - Efficiency in producing goods and services gt
Skills, information, meritocracy, reliability
(i.e. the Weberian bureaucracy) valorization of
scope and scale effects - Being the ultimate guarantor of equal rights
- gt Against special interests, corruption,
cartels, etc. - gt Against capture by rulers checks
balances, judicial independence, etc. - gt A counter-example the Informal sector (De
Sotto, Maloney)
14The Constitutional bargain packages of rights
14
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
15The Constitutional bargain packages of rights
15
Security of persons property rigths
Physical security vs. civil war, rampant
violence Security of property rights vs.
large-scale informality vs. illegitimate
allocation of prop. rights vs rent-seeking
(energy-exporting) countries
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
16The Constitutional bargain packages of rights
16
Security of persons property rigths
Market access and competition vs. capture by
the prime movers vs. pro-business
reform Absorption of market externalities
vs. rampant macro-financial instability vs.
weak consumer norm enforcement
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
17The Constitutional bargain packages of rights
17
Security of persons property rigths
Access to voice and representation vs.
capture by insiders (eg old white men) vs.
limited access to organizat media Checks and
Balances vs. weak enforcemt. of hierarchy of
laws vs. limited independence of courts vs.
corrupted, incompetent local govts
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
18The Constitutional bargain packages of rights
18
Security of persons property rigths
Support to aggregate demand vs. absence of
macroeconomic capacities vs. narrow domestic
market Social solidarities vs. large
switching cost when leaving communities vs.
Failure to address broader externalities
(environmt., etc)
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
19The Constitutional bargain packages of rights
19
Security of persons property rigths
Failed states Rent-seeking states
Market access fair competition
Oligarchic societies
Political access
Authoritarian modernisers
Social rights
Libertarian or strong social endogeneizers
20The Constitutional Profiles
20
BBR
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
21The Constitutional Profiles
21
BBR
Brazil
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
22The Constitutional Profiles
22
BBR
China
Brazil
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
23The Constitutional Profiles
23
BBR
China
Russia
Brazil
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
24The Constitutional Profiles
24
BBR
China
Russia
Brazil
Cuba
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights
25The Constitutional Profiles
25
BBR
China
Russia
Brazil
Cuba
Somalia
Security of persons property rigths
Market access fair competition
Political access
Social rights