Title: Risk Assessment Guest Lecture
1Risk AssessmentGuest Lecture
- Thomas P. Oscar, Ph.D.
- USDA, ARS
- Princess Anne, MD
2Risk AssessmentHolistic Approach to Food Safety
Disease Triangle
3Hazard Identification
- Epidemiological data
- Outbreaks
- Sporadic cases
- End product testing
- Pathogen number and distribution in food
Higher risk food/pathogen combos
Expensive time consuming
4Exposure AssessmentChange in pathogen
distribution and number from hazard
identification to the table
- Unit Operations
- Retail Store
- Consumer Transport
- Cooking
- Serving
- Consumption
- Pathogen Events
- Contamination
- Growth
- Death
- Cross-contamination
- Dose-response
5Hazard CharacterizationIndividual Dose-response
Disease Triangle
6Hazard CharacterizationPopulation Dose-response
Disease Triangle
Uniform Pathogen Food Host
7Hazard CharacterizationPopulation Dose-response
Disease Triangle
Non-uniform Pathogen Food Host
8Risk CharacterizationPublic Health Impact
- Rate of Illness
- Number per 100,000 consumers
- 15 to 20 cases per 100,000 consumers
- 0.66 to 0.88 cases per 100,000 chicken consumers
9A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for
Salmonella and Whole Chickens
- International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2004
- vol. 93231-247.
10Quantitative Risk Assessment Model (QRAM)
Fig. 1
11Monte Carlo Simulation
Incidence
Extent
- Input Distributions
- Random Number Generator
- Formula
- A 2B2 C
- Output Distributions
A B C
1 6 7 104
2 3 5 53
3 8 2 16
100 2 9 164
12Pathogen Eventsgrowth, death, survival,
cross-contamination
13Rare Events ModelingInitial Contamination
Iteration 1 2 3 100
Discrete 1 0 0 0
Pert (0,1,4) 1.8 1.2 0.2 2.2
Power 63.1 15.8 1.6 158.5
Round 63 0 0 0
RiskDiscrete(90,10,0,1) RiskPert(0,1,4) Po
wer(10,Pert) Round(IF(Discrete0,0,Pert),0)
14Node 1RetailInitial Contamination
Extent (log MPN/chicken) Extent (log MPN/chicken) Extent (log MPN/chicken)
Incidence Minimum Median Maximum
30 0 1 2.7
15Probability DistributionIncidence
16Probability DistributionLog Number
17Node 2Consumer Transport Growth
Extent (log change/chicken) Extent (log change/chicken) Extent (log change/chicken)
Incidence Minimum Median Maximum
0.02 0.0005 0.04 0.15
Time (0.2, 1, 6.3 h)
Predictive Model (Oscar, 2002)
Consumer survey
Temp (-3.9, 7.8, 21.1?C)
18Node 3CookingThermal Inactivation
Extent (log change/chicken) Extent (log change/chicken) Extent (log change/chicken)
Incidence Minimum Median Maximum
100 -96 -8.1 -0.83
Time (15,30,45 min)
Predictive Model (Murphy et al., 2002)
Consumer survey
Temp 55,62,70?C)
Fig. 2
19Probability DistributionLog Cycle Change
20Node 4ServingCross-contamination
Extent ( transfer/chicken) Extent ( transfer/chicken) Extent ( transfer/chicken)
Incidence Minimum Median Maximum
28 0.021 0.057 0.24
21Probability Distribution Transfer
22Node 5ConsumptionDose-Response
Extent (log illness dose) Extent (log illness dose) Extent (log illness dose)
Incidence Minimum Median Maximum
100 1 3 7
If (dose consumed lt illness dose, no illness,
illness)
Disease Triangle
Pathogen
Host
Food
23Probability DistributionIllness Dose
24ResultsChicken 6632 of 10,000 simulated
Fig. 3
25Simulation Results Nodes 1 to 5
Fig. 4
26Node 2Consumer Transport
Fig. 5
27Node 3Cooking
Fig. 6
28Node 4Serving
Fig. 7
29Node 5Illness Dose
Fig. 8
30Node 5Dose-response Assessment
Fig. 9
31Risk Characterization
1 million chickens 4 people ate each chicken
RNGS Cases
1 17
7 21
29 18
83 14
17.8 (1.5)
17.8 cases/1 million chickens or 0.44
cases/100,000 consumers
32What if ScenariosEfficacy of Interventions
Short-term no change in illness
dose Longer-term 50 or 75 decrease in illness
dose
PR 50 pathogen reduction before retail e.g.
antimicrobial rinse CE 50 pathogen reduction
at serving e.g. consumer education
33Risk AssessmentHolistic Approach to Food Safety