Title: AJ 58 - Community and Human Relations
1AJ 58 - Community and Human Relations
- Chapter 2
- A History of
- Community Policing
2Historical Overview of Policing
- Totalitarian Countries
- The few impose will on the many
- Democratic Society
- People make laws through elected representatives
- Challenge in U.S.
- Police independence (from political corruption)
vs. public accountability (from citizenry)
3Historical Shift from Informal to Formal Policing
- Influencing factors
- Population growth
- Change from agrarian to industrial society
- Unequal distribution of resources
- Crowding into cities
- Advances in technology
4Evolution of Policing
- Simple society simple, self-policing
- Volunteer night watchmen
- Pay for watchman duties
- Motorized patrol replaced foot patrol
- With each of these advances, there was an
increased separation from the community!
5British Roots of Modern Policing
- Why did the King and his noblemen have a vested
interest in keeping the peace and reducing crime
and rebellion? - Tax money collected during feudal system!
- Self-policing citizens (800-900)
- Justice of the Peace (1300s)
- Paid, professional police force (1800s)
-
6The British Industrial Revolution
- Britains population doubled from six to twelve
million - Many moved to large cities for work, but
machinery had replaced many jobs - Sudden, drastic increase in
- Unemployment
- Food shortages
- Homelessness
- Sewage and pollution
- Riots and rebellion
- Military troops called in to quell riots
uprisings
7Sir Robert Peel
- British Home Secretary (1822)
- Created Metropolitan Police Act (1829)
- Established first Police Office at Scotland Yard
with paid constables - Bobbies deployed by divisions, beats
- Hiring Process
- 12,000 applicants for 6,000 jobs
- Many from other areas
- High turnover during first year
- Low pay
- Misconduct
- Public resistance
8Early Problems and Successes
- Citizens called for police force to disband after
first year - Police persisted and gained respect despite
ongoing riots - Did not use excessive force
- Did not resort to calling in military
- As crime rate began to drop, respect for police
grew - Pensions (1890)
- Code of Professional Conduct (1918)
9US Colonial Law Enforcement
- 1636 Boston, night watch
- Males 18 expected to serve
- 1651 New York, scout and rattle
- Service as punishment
- 1705 Philadelphia, night patrols
- City divided into patrol areas, each with its own
Constable and volunteers
10Regional Variations
- South
- Rural, agricultural
- Relied on services of County Sheriff
- West and Midwest
- Elected Constables or Sheriffs
- As cities and populations grew, so did
crime-related problems - Similar to Industrial Revolution in Britain
11Rise of Municipal Police
- Early problems
- Night watch only
- Erratic, inefficient enforcement
- Questionable character/competence of watchmen
- As police groups grew, so did corruption
- Riots in major cities in early 1800s led to
formation of full-time police organizations by
1860s
12The Spoils EraTo the winner go the spoils
- Police officials acted above the law
- Political corruption
- Cronyism for selection/promotion
- Bribery Graft
- Rigged elections
- Racial harassment
- Some efforts to reform, but most fell short
- Philadelphia (1860), standardized police uniform
- New York City Police Department, 1894
- Pay to get hired/promoted
13Vigilantism
- Goes beyond citizens getting involved in aiding
police - Operates in opposition to legal norms
- Injects emotion into process where reason should
prevail - South Carolina Regulators, 1767
14Rationale of Vigilantism
- Self-preservation
- Be prepared to kill-or-be-killed if the system
fails - Right of Revolution
- As valid a response as reform when the system
breaks down - Economics
- Saving money for the criminal justice system
15Inherent Problems with Vigilantism
- Punishment without due process
- No external controls over vigilante group
- Overreaction to certain actions/groups
- Racial harassment
- May be ignored or condoned by law enforcement
16Policing in the Early 20th Century
- Civil Service reform helped professionalize
departments, but some still lacked positive,
effective leadership - Chiefs and Commissioners were transient
- NYPD had 12 in 19 years
- London had 7 in 91 years
- Hands tied by legislative constraints
- Difficult to implement innovative programs
17Volstead Act, 1919
- Prohibition of alcohol largely unpopular, often
ignored - Police lost respect, trust, cooperation due to
enforcing unpopular law
18Police Reform of the 1930s
- Led by Oakland Police Chief August Vollmer
- Principles of police reform
- Eliminate political corruption
- Independent chief
- Educated/trained, professional police
- Judicious use of latest technology
- Benefits of crime-prevention
- Expanded role for women in police work
- Different approaches for different areas
- Role of public service in policing
19Impact Areas of Vollmers Reforms
- Authorization
- Authority based on professionalism and law
- Function
- Crime control
- Organizational Design
- Centralized organization
- Demand for Services
- Mainly as crime fighters
- Relationship to Environment
- Professional aloofness to avoid corruption
- Tactics Technology
- Motor patrols for more rapid response
- Outcomes
- Success based on crime control
20More Reforms
- Local police followed FBI lead
- J. Edgar Hoover had made FBI more popular and
respected - Some cities adopted civil service exams for
chiefs - Some chiefs received lifetime tenure, increasing
power and authority - State police departments formed as link between
federal and local efforts
21Police and Minorities
- Historical clash between powerful and poor
- Wealthy privileges in English feudal system
- Political/media-created fear of minorities
- European immigrants to U.S.
- Fear of police oppression
- Police mistreatment of minorities has sometimes
been reflection of society - Rich vs. poor
- Us vs. Them mentality
22Community-Outreach Efforts
- Police reforms of 1930s tended to
professionalize departments but isolated Police
from Community - Police-Community Relations efforts (1950s)
- Aimed high but fell short
- Good intentions with limited scope
23Goals of Police-Community Relations
- Improve communication, reduce hostility
- Crime detection/prevention skills for all
- Equal protections
- Teamwork approach
- Positive officer attitude towards PCR
- Enhance mutual understanding
- Community involvement is necessary
24Crime Prevention Units
- Some departments created separate unit, some
combine with PCR - Proactive approach to helping entire Community
- Provided education for business community as well
as residents to prevent victimization - Usually manned by Staff, not line personnel
25The Challenge of the 1960s
- Decade began with optimistic/idealistic outlook
- Peace Corps, civil rights movement
- JFK, LBJ, MLK
- Mid-1960s saw political upheaval and civil
unrest - Viet Nam, civil rights protests
- Bonded racial groups
- Conflict among protestors/philosophies
- SDS vs. The Weathermen, leading to emergence of
other violent groups like SLA - Democratic Convention, Chicago (1968)
- Violent police actions against protestors
26Team Policing Model, 1970s
- Reaction to ineffectiveness of PCR and
Crime-Prevention strategies - Placed permanent team of officers within same
geographical area to increase consistent contact
with community - Limitations and obstacles
- Applied as a limited tactic
- Lacked departmental commitment
- Reactive to community needs
- Challenged traditional police organizational
standards
27The Birth of Community Policing
- Some transformation had to occur due to changes
in political, economic, and social structures in
society - Many contributing factors
- Advanced agendas of police reformers
- Increased funding for Community Policing programs
- Alienation of Police from Community
- Narrow Police mission of fighting crime
- Over-reliance on efficiency and effectiveness
- Reliance on technology vs. human interaction
- Insulation of management from community
accountability - Concerns over human-rights violations
- Failure of previous models and methods
28Learning from Past Mistakes
- Problems arise when Police
- Become alienated from Community
- Use overt or symbolic violence as means of
control - Creates Us vs. Them mentality on both sides
- Community Policing uses best elements from past
efforts