Title: Contaminated Land
1Contaminated Land
- Full-Scale Remediation Technologies
- Physical
- Chemical
- Thermal
2Physical Remediation Technologies
- Overview and Principles
- Physical Technologies
- Ex Situ
- Soil Washing
- In Situ
- Soil Vapour Extraction
- Electro-Remediation
- Examples
3Physical Remediation TechnologiesOverview and
Principles
- Soil Washing (Bergmann, Lurgi, BioTrol)
- intensive, water-based removal of non- and
semi-volatile contaminants from soil - washed fractions replaced
- contaminated fractions to disposal or further
treatment - Soil Vapour Extraction (SVE) or Venting
- extensive, vacuum extraction of vapour phase from
between soil particles advection for sorbed
organics - extracted vapours further treated
- Electrokinetic Remediation (Geokinetics BV)
- electrical current (DC) transports charged
(ionic) contaminants towards electrodes - contaminants accumulate at electrode
4Physical Remediation TechnologiesEx Situ Soil
Washing
- Pretreatment
- screening, crushing
- Washing and Rinsing
- Slurrying, attrition scrubbing, ultrasonic
treatment - reduced to individual particle size
- Particle Sizing and Classification
(Fractionation) - sedimentation, hydrocyclones, sieving and
screening - (cf.sand and gravel operations)
- flotation
- flocculants, dewatering
- Clean Coarse Fractions
- Contaminated Fines - clays, humics
- Wastewater Treatment
- wash water recycle
- Process works better with coarser soils
- Soil structure impaired
5Physical Remediation TechnologiesEx Situ Soil
Washing
- Time
- Intensive process (days - weeks)
- Costs
- 20 - 160 per m3
- silt and clay content significant determinant
- (economic upper limit of 30 - 40)
- Resources
- plant and power
- Application Range
- most volatile and non-volatile organics
- inorganics, heavy metals
- Not Asbestos
6Example Ex Situ Soil Washing
- Site
- Canal Sediment, Birmingham
- Contamination
- Zinc, copper, nickel, chromium
- mineral oils
- Remediation Method
- soil washing
- landfill of contaminated fines
- Performance
- 90 contaminants concentrated into reduced
volume - (30 of original sediment)
- Time
- months due to low capacity of system (10m3 /day)
- Cost
- 30 per m3 including disposal off-site
7Soil washing
8Physical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ Soil
Vapour Extraction
- Established Process (Terra Vac )
- also known as Soil Venting
- Extraction Wells
- slotted PVC pipe, grouted upper section
- depth 1.5m to 90m (Vadose only)
- numbers depend on soil permeability
- placement critical - short circuiting
- Soil surface preparation - compaction, membranes
- Infiltration Wells
- optional
- passive or forced flow
- Induced air flow aids bioremediation
- Groundwater Abstraction
- depression of groundwater table (greater
exposure)
9Physical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ Soil
Vapour Extraction
- Critical Factors
- Boiling point / vapour pressure
- volatility VOC only (KH gt 10-2 atm.l/mole )
- Subsurface temperature
- soil permeability
- soil organic matter content
- System Monitoring
- vapour concentration (pulsed extraction)
- mass balance
- Oxygen and Carbon dioxide (biodegradation)
- Treatment of Extracted Vapours
- to atmosphere
- Combustion engine
- thermal oxidation
- GAC adsorption
10Physical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ Soil
Vapour Extraction
- Supplementary Methods
- Thermally Enhanced SVE (Steam Stripping)
- extends application to less volatile SVOCs
- Steam or hot air injected
- Air Sparging
- Air bubbled through contaminated groundwater
- strips VOC from water
- Directional Drilling
- contaminated zone geometry
- specific positioning of well around
- existing structures and obstructions
- Pneumatic or Hydraulic Fracturing
- new channels created
11SVE
12Physical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ Soil
Vapour Extraction
- Time
- extensive (1 - 2 years)
- Costs
- 5 - 40 per m3
- 15 70 per m3 (with thermal enhancement)
- Resources
- Power
- Emission control equipment
- Application Range
- VOC (some SVOC)
- only certain soil types
13In Situ Soil Vapour Extraction Example
- Site
- Service Station
- Contamination
- 5000 litres fuel beneath road and forecourt
- max depth 3m
- Remediation Method
- Soil Vapour Extraction (Venting), then
bioventing - extraction at 25 - 60 m3/h
- Performance
- TPH from 10,000 mg/kg to 260 mg/kg
- half removal by biodegradation (bioventing)
- Time
- 2 years
- Cost
- estimated 60 per m3 (includes the bioventing
time)
14(No Transcript)
15Physical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ
Electrokinetic Remediation
- New Full-Scale Process
- Patent licence Geokinetics International Inc.
- Electrodes
- spacing 1 - 2m
- graphite with membrane sheath
- electrolyte recirculation and regeneration
- Principle
- electrokinetic and electro-osmotic movement
- Electrode design (recirculated electrolye)
- Anions move to anode (ve electrode)
- Cations, metals move to Cathode
- Electrolysis of water produces H at anode
- Acid front sweeps through soil, extracts metals
- extensive process (in situ)
- intensive (ex situ)
16Physical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ
Electrokinetic Remediation
- Power Requirement
- Low voltage DC 20 - 40 V/m
- current at a few Amps/m2
- 500 kWh/m3 at 1.5m electrode spacing
- Applicability
- Performs well in fine grained, saturated,
low-permeability soils ( e.g. clays) - vertical and horizontal process
- metal removal
- enhanced degradation of organics (Lasagne
process) - Considerations
- buried metal objects, power cables
- soil CEC and alkalinity
- safety - hydrogen and chlorine gas generation
- Soil Condition
- structure and fertility retained
17electrokinetics
18Chemical Remediation Technologies
- Overview and Principles
- Chemical Technologies
- Examples
- Ex Situ
- Soil Washing (with chemicals)
- Chemical Reactors
- In Situ
- Soil Flushing
- Funnel and Gate
19Chemical Remediation TechnologiesOverview and
Principles
- Extractive
- dissolve contaminant into extractant phase
- does not destroy contaminants
- Extractants require regeneration
- residual extractant left in soil
- Destructive
- most contaminants are unsuitable (unreactive)
- reactivity of soil interferes
- reagents may be environmentally unacceptable
- Detrimental to Soil Structure and Fertility
- Application
- few operational commercial processes in use
- numerous novel pilot demonstrations
20Chemical Remediation TechnologiesEx Situ Soil
Washing
- A Development of the Physical Soil Washing
process - acids
- Alkalis
- chelating agents (EDTA)
- surfactants
- Benefits
- All solid fractions treated
- contaminant moved into wash-waters
- water treatment possible
- Drawbacks
- soil structure
- residual extractant in soil
extractant class
21Chemical Remediation TechnologiesEx Situ
Chemical Reactors
- Ex Situ Solvent Extraction
- batch or continuous , single stage or
counter-current reactors - extraction into liquid solvent -
water/triethylamine - SCF super-critical fluid extractants - CO2 ,
propane - vegetable oil regeneration of extractant
- Drawbacks
- residual solvent contamination
- Soil structure
- Applications
- PCBs
- Viscous, non-VOC
- Metals
22Chemical Remediation TechnologiesEx Situ
Chemical Reactors
- Chemical Dehalogenation (Destructive)
- Soil Pretreated
- Soil Mixed with reagents
- APEG, alkaline polyethylene glycol, (KPEG)
- Heated
- 100 -180 C for 1 - 5 hours
- chlorine removed, glycol ether derivative is
formed - Neutralization
- Time
- intensive but limited plant capacity - (months
per site) - Application
- chlorinated contaminants, PCB, solvents, Dioxins
- Cost
- High 300 - 500 per m3
23Chemical Remediation TechnologiesEx Situ
Chemical Reactors
- Other Potential Destructive Methods
- Oxidation
- O3, H2O2 and Ferrous ion, ClO2, Wet Air Oxidation
- for PAH, TCE, PCP, phenols , Cyanide
- Hydrolysis
- reaction with water, better at high pH
- enzymes
- for Cyanide, organophosphorus pesticides,
- Reduction
- Sodium borohydride for many organics
- Iron (zero valent) powder for halogenated
organics - Polymerization
- pre-polymer contaminants (styrene, vinyl
chloride)
24Chemical Remediation TechnologiesIn Situ Soil
Flushing
- In Situ version of Soil Washing
- no physical mixing
- Infiltration and recycle of extractant
- shallow soil (galleries, collection channels)
- deep soil (extraction well, Pump and Treat)
- Mild Extractants
- dilute acids, alkalis
- chelating agents
- surfactants
- External Treatment
- adsorption, flocculation, biological degradation
- Soil Neutralization
- must attenuate residual reagents
25Soil flushing
26Chemical Remediation TechnologiesExample Soil
Flushing
- Site
- Photographic Paper Factory, Holland
- Contamination
- 30,000 m3 soil with Cadmium (20 mg/kg)
- Complex site, buried structures (tanks)
- Remediation Method
- In Situ Soil Flushing (0.001M HCl)
- Ion exchange
- Performance
- Cd reduced to lt 1 mg/kg
- Time
- 1 year
- Cost
- experience limited, this case 90 per m3
27Chemical Remediation TechnologiesFunnel and
Gate(Permeable Reacive Barrier, PRB )
- Barriers (Funnel)
- divert groundwater flow
- focus contaminants
- Reactive Cell (Gate)
- Chemical dehalogenation (zero valent Iron
filings) - Oxidation
- chemical (oxygen precipitation of metal oxides)
- biological (bacterial oxidation of BTEX)
- Other types of reactive cell
- Adsorption (activated carbon)
- Biofilter media (biodegradation)
28Thermal Remediation Technologies
- Overview and Principles
- Thermal Technologies
- Examples
- Ex Situ
- Thermal Desorption
- Incineration
- (Vitrification)
29Thermal Remediation TechnologiesOverview and
Principles
- Ex-situ Method
- Fixed Centralized Plant or On-site Plant
- Standard Industrial Thermal Processors
- cement kiln, asphalt dryer
- Soil Destroyed
- inert ash
- Thermal Desorption
- organic contaminant moved from solid-phase to
gas-phase - relatively low temperatures 400 - 600 C
- Incineration
- organic contaminant degraded (oxidised or
Pyrolysed) - very high temperatures 800 - 1200 C
- Vitrification
- extremely high temperatures 1200 - 1600 C
30Thermal Remediation TechnologiesThermal
Desorption
- Treatment Train Process
- soil pretreatment
- desorption with Gas Emission Control
- cooling
- Kiln
- rotary, conveyor, screw
- direct or indirect heating
- Energy required 2500MJ per tonne (400 C, 20
moisture) - 300m3 gas per tonne
- Gas Treatment
- Thermal oxidation
- Cooling
- Scrubbers (acids)
- carbon adsorption
- Cost
- scale dependent 50 - 300 per m3
- water content (75 of costs for wet soil gt 20
moisture)
31Thermal desorption
32Thermal Remediation TechnologiesIncineration
- Treatment train process but the main destruction
occurs in the kiln - Kiln
- Direct Fired Rotary Kiln
- Fluidised Bed
- infra-red incinerator
- Flue Gas
- PIC (products of incomplete combustion)
- dust
- water
- acid
- metals
- Costs
- Off-site plant 200 - 1000 per m3 (petroleum
contaminant) - 1000 - 5000 per m3 (for PCB contaminants)
33Thermal Remediation TechnologiesExample
Incineration
- Site
- Oil Refinery, USA
- Contamination
- 7,000 tonnes sediment
- PCB at 5 mg/kg
- Remediation Method
- Incineration
- Performance
- PCB lt 0.9 mg/kg
- Time
- 2 months
- Cost
- 500 per m3