Weyl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Weyl

Description:

Weyl s predicative math in type theory Zhaohui Luo Dept of Computer Science Royal Holloway, Univ of London (Joint work with Robin Adams) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: acuk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Weyl


1
Weyls predicative math in type theory
  • Zhaohui Luo
  • Dept of Computer Science
  • Royal Holloway, Univ of London
  • (Joint work with Robin Adams)

2
  • Formalisation of mathematics
  • with different logical foundations
  • in a type-theoretic framework

3
This talk
  • Maths based on different logical foundations
  • Weyls predicative mathematics
  • Type-theoretic framework
  • Example logic-enriched TT with classical logic
  • Predicativity
  • Impredicative and predicative notions of set
  • Formalisations
  • Real number system, predicatively and
    impredicatively

4
I. Applications of TT to formalisation of maths
  • Formalisation in TT-based proof assistants
  • Examples in Coq
  • Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  • Four-colour Theorem
  • Maths with different logical foundations
  • Variety of maths, all legacies (mathematical
    pluralism)
  • Adequacy in formalisation? Uniform framework?
  • Type theory and associated technology
  • Not just for constructive math
  • Also for classical math and other maths

5
Maths with different logical foundations examples
  • Consider the combinations of the following and
    their negations
  • (C) Classical logic
  • (I) Impredicative definitions
  • We would have
  • (CI) Ordinary (classical, impredicative) math
  • Classical set theory/simple type theory,
    HOL/Isabelle
  • (CI) Predicative constructive math
  • Martin-Löfs TT, ALF/Agda/NuPRL
  • (CI) Impredicative constructive math
  • Constructions/CID/ECC/UTT, Coq/Lego/Plastic
  • (CI) Predicative classical math
  • Weyl, Feferman, Simpson,
  • Uniform foundational framework for formalisation?

6
Weyls predicative mathematics
  • H. Weyl. The Continuum. (Das Kontinuum.) 1918.
  • Historical development (paradox etc.)
  • The notion of category
  • Predicative development of the real number system
  • Weyl/Feferman/Simpsons work on predicativity
  • Predicativity
  • E.g., x f(x) with f being arithmetical
    (without quantification over sets)
  • Fefermans development on predicativism
  • Simpsons work on reverse mathematics

7
II. Logic-enriched type theories in LFs
  • Logic-enriched type theory
  • Aczel Gambino (LTT in the intuitionistic
    setting) AG02,06
  • c.f. separation of logical propositions and data
    types in ECC/UTT Luo90,94
  • Type-theoretic framework for mathematical
    pluralism
  • Logic-enriched TTs in a logical framework
  • Logic Types
  • \ /
  • \ /
  • Logical
  • Framework

8
An example T
  • T LF Classical FOL Ind types/universes
  • Classical Ind types
  • FOL universes
  • \ /
  • \ /
  • LF

9
Classical FOL (specified in a logical framework)
  • Propositions (note LF should be extended with
    Prop and Prf)
  • Prop kind
  • Prf(P) kind P Prop
  • Logical operators
  • P?Q Prop P Prop, Q Prop
  • ?A,P Prop A Type, PxA Prop
  • P Prop P Prop
  • DNP,p Prf(P) PProp, pPrf(P)

10
Types
  • Inductive types/families
  • e.g. Nats, Trees, (as in TTs such as UTT)
  • Induction Rule elimination over propositions.
  • Example the natural numbers
  • N Type, 0 N, succn N n N
  • Elimination over types
  • ElimTC,c,f,n Cn, for Cn Type n N
  • Plus computational rules for ElimT eg,
  • ElimTC,c,f,succ(n) fn,ElimTC,c,f,n
  • Induction over propositions
  • ElimPP,c,f,n Pn, for Pn Prop n N

11
Relative consistency
  • Theorem (relative consistency of T)
  • T is logically consistent w.r.t. ZF.

12
III. Formalisation
  • Consider
  • Classical logic T
  • \ /
  • \ /
  • LF
  • with
  • T Inductive types Impredicative sets (I)
  • Predicative sets (I)

13
Impredicative notion of set
  • Typed sets, impredicatively
  • SetAType Type
  • setAType,PxAProp SetA
  • inAType,aA,SSetA Prop
  • inA,a,setA,P Pa Prop
  • Every set has a base type (or category)
  • Sets are given by characteristic propositional
    functions
  • x A P(x) set(A,P)
  • s ? S in(A,s,S)
  • One can formulate powersets as

14
Predicative notion of set
  • Type universe and propositional universe
  • type Type and Tatype Type (universe of
    small types)
  • prop Prop and Vpprop Prop (universe of
    small propositions)
  • ?atype,pxTaprop prop and V?a,p
    ?Ta,V?p Prop
  • Predicative notion of set
  • SetAType Type
  • setAType,pxAprop SetA
  • inAType,xA,SSetA prop
  • inA,x,setA,p px prop

15
Formalisation in Plastic
  • Plastic (Callaghan CL01)
  • Plastic proof assistant, implementing a logical
    framework
  • Extending Plastic with Prop etc.
  • Formalisation
  • Weyls predicative development
  • Nats, Integers, Rationals, and Dedekind cuts.
  • Completion and LUB theorems for real numbers.
  • Other features
  • Types as informal categories
  • Typed sets
  • Setoids
  • Comparison between predicative and impredicative
    developments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com