Title: Of Rights as Workers: Women in Public Services
1Of Rights as Workers Women in Public Services
- Indrani Mazumdar,
- Centre for Womens Development Studies (CWDS)
- New Delhi
2- Indian womens experience of public sector
employment qualitatively and quantitatively
different from China in terms of size, share of
employment, and social role - Historically low share of women in Indias public
sector, and even with some increases, still short
of 18 in 2012 - Relatively greater domination of Community and
Social Services (CSS) in the profile of women
public sector employment. In 2011, 75 of women
concentrated in CSS. Among male public sector
employees/workers, CSS 48 - Relatively greater presence of women in the
southern region. Southern India accounts for 38
of womens public sector employment in India in
comparison to 22 among male employees. - This matches broad pattern of higher rates of
urban female work participation in the south.
3Industry Distribution of Public Sector Womens Employment (000s) 2001 Share of Women 2001 Distribution of Public Sector Womens Employment Share of Women 2011
Agriculture 48.17 (2) 10 59.63 (2) 13
Mining 55.48 (2) 7 82.78 (3) 8
Manufacturing 92.18 (3) 6 77.37 (2) 8
Electricity/gas/water 44.88 (2) 5 56.44 (2) 7
Construction 63.89 (2) 6 65.35 (2) 8
Trade Hotels 17.34 (1) 10 13.89 (0.4) 8
Transport/Communications 173.41 (6) 6 189.98 (6) 8
Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Business Services 184.30 (6) 15 221.77 (7) 16
Community, Social Personal Services 2170.40 (76) 22 2364.08 (75) 26
all 2850.04 (100) 15 3131.29 (100) 18
4Region/Zone Distribution of Public Sector Womens Employment (000s) 2001 Share of Women 2001 Distribution of Public Sector Womens Employment (000s) 2011 Share of Women 2011
North 462.62 (16) 15 521.59 (16) 18
Central 354.64 (12) 11 396.11 (12) 13
North Eastern 151.83 (5) 17 166.74 (5) 19
Eastern 296.83 (10) 8 326.49 (10) 10
Western 503.51 (18) 16 612.35 (19) 20
Southern 1076.36 (38) 23 1139.84 (38) 26
All 2850.04 (100) 15 3170.64 (100) 18
5Uncounted Women Workers in public service
delivery Denied Worker Status and Rights
- A notable tendency in administration of public
services in India has been the increasing
recruitment of millions of women as so-called
volunteers or activists - Denied any legal status/recognition as
workers,they are consequently deprived not only
of employment rights as public sector/government
employees, but also of any legal entitlement as
workers to statutory minimum wages and social
security benefits - Paid well below subsistence wages,
euphemistically called honoraria or
incentives (honoraria referring to monthly
salaries, and incentives to piece rates)
6- 3 principal programmes or schemes through which
the Central Government of India has evolved a
massive system of underpaying and using women as
the cheapest workforce for the delivery of
essential public services - An army of more than 5 million women workers in
just these three schemes actually exceeds the
total number women in official public sector
employment by well over a million - ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme)
employs more than 2.4 million Anganwadi Workers
and Helpers all women - National Health Mission employs 894,525 ASHA
(Accredited Social Health Activist) workers all
women - Mid-day Meal Scheme for Primary and Upper Primary
Schools employs 2.57 cooks-cum-helpers of which
85 (2.2 million) are women
7- These Scheme Workers have emerged as a vanguard
in movements of women workers commanding a new
respect and support from even male trade
unionists - Their struggles have been many, but an
anti-labour environment has influenced
particularly the higher judiciary and advances
made for legal recognition as workers have been
reversed - Experience of trade unions seems to indicate that
in this all female workforce/cadres, the scope
for growth and development of women leaders has
been greater - Paradoxically, the organisation of these all
female cadres of workers has been by the mixed
gender based trade union organisations - The one central trade union that is all female
and focuses on informal workers has not played a
role in organising scheme workers