Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis

Description:

Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis Basic Principles If there is no direct or indirect evidence supporting an element, the jury must conclude that the element has ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: AchtenbergD
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis


1
Some Practical Rules for JAML Analysis
2
Basic Principles
3
  • If there is no direct or indirect evidence
    supporting an element, the jury must conclude
    that the element has not been established.

4
  • If there is conflicting direct evidence regarding
    an element, jury gets to resolve the issue.

5
  • Unless the other rules dictate a different
    result, if direct evidence and indirect evidence
    conflict, the jury gets to resolve the issue.

6
Evidence That Does Not Count
7
  • The jury must disregard direct evidence
  • From a witness who did not have an opportunity to
    observe, or
  • That is physically impossible

8
  • Generally, the jury must disregard a non-expert
    witnesss conclusions (inferences from
    observations).

9
Evidence That Must Be Believed
10
  • Usually, a jury has the right to disbelieve
    direct evidence even without contradictory
    evidence. However . . .

11
  • The jury must believe direct evidence that is
  • unimpeached and
  • uncontradicted and
  • from a
  • disinterested witness or
  • a source that cannot reasonably be doubted

12
Inferences That May Not Be Drawn
13
  • If there is evidence of facts from which an
    element could be inferred (rather than direct
    evidence of the element), the jury decides
  • whether to believe the facts
  • Whether to draw the inference
  • Unless no reasonable jury
  • could infer the element from the facts (under the
    more likely than not standard)

14
Dogs That Do Not Bark
15
  • If the burdened party could produce evidence on
    a particular factual issue and does not do so, it
    may change the rules as follows
  • It may cause the judge to decide that the jury
    has to believe the other sides direct evidence
  • even though that evidence has been impeached or
    comes from an interested party.

16
  • If the burdened party could produce evidence on
    a particular factual issue and does not do so, it
    may change the rules as follows
  • It may cause the judge to decide that the jury
    cannot draw a particular inference
  • even though that inference would otherwise be
    reasonable.

17
Some Procedural Questions
18
  • When can one file a JAML motion?
  • When must one file a JAML motion if one wants to
    file a JNOV (deferred JAML)?
  • Why?
  • Why is it important to file a JNOV?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com