Title: Making Sense of the Math Revisions
1Making Sense of the Math Revisions
- George W. Bright, Ph.D.
- Special Assistant to the Superintendent
- OSPI
- George.Bright_at_k12.wa.us
2Overview of the Session
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- Legislative Actions Graduation Requirements
- Revised Mathematics Standards Feb 29 version
- Platter Review and Recommendations
- Digging into the Revised Standards
3National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- Final Report released on March 13, 2008.
- 45 Recommendations and Findings
- Major Topics of School Algebra
- Critical Foundations of Algebra
- Benchmarks for the Critical Foundations
4National Mathematics Advisory PanelK-8 Curriculum
- The mathematics curriculum in Grades PreK8
should be streamlined and should emphasize a
well-defined set of the most critical topics in
the early grades.
5National Mathematics Advisory PanelInstruction
- Instructional practice should be informed by
high-quality research, when available, and by the
best professional judgment and experience of
accomplished classroom teachers. High-quality
research does not support the contention that
instruction should be either entirely student
centered or teacher directed. Research
indicates that some forms of particular
instructional practices can have a positive
impact under specified conditions.
6National Mathematics Advisory PanelTeachers
- Our citizens and their educational leadership
should recognize mathematically knowledgeable
classroom teachers as having a central role in
mathematics education and should encourage
rigorously evaluated initiatives for attracting
and appropriately preparing prospective teachers,
and for evaluating and retaining effective
teachers.
7National Mathematics Advisory PanelEffort
- Use should be made of what is clearly known from
rigorous research about how children learn,
especially by recognizing a) the advantages for
children in having a strong start b) the
mutually reinforcing benefits of conceptual
understanding, procedural fluency, and automatic
(i.e., quick and effortless) recall of facts and
c) that effort, not just inherent talent, counts
in mathematical achievement.
8National Mathematics Advisory PanelAssessment
- NAEP and state assessments should be improved in
quality and should carry increased emphasis on
the most critical knowledge and skills leading to
Algebra.
9National Mathematics Advisory PanelResearch
- The nation must continue to build capacity for
more rigorous research in education so that it
can inform policy and practice more effectively.
10Major Topics of School Algebra (1 and 2)
- Symbols and Expressions
- Polynomial expressions, Rational expressions,
Arithmetic and finite geometric series - Linear Equations
- Real numbers as points on the number line,
Linear equations and their graphs, Solving
problems with linear equations, Linear
inequalities and their graphs, Graphing and
solving systems of simultaneous linear equations - Quadratic Equations
- Factors and factoring of quadratic polynomials
with integer coefficients, Completing the square
in quadratic expressions, Quadratic formula and
factoring of general quadratic polynomials, Using
the quadratic formula to solve equations
11Major Topics of School Algebra (1 and 2)
- Functions
- Linear functions, Quadratic functionsword
problems involving quadratic functions, Graphs of
quadratic functions and completing the square,
Polynomial functions (including graphs of basic
functions), Simple nonlinear functions (e.g.,
square and cube root functions absolute value
rational functions step functions), Rational
exponents, radical expressions, and exponential
functions, Logarithmic functions, Trigonometric
functions, Fitting simple mathematical models to
data - Algebra of Polynomials
- Roots and factorization of polynomials, Complex
numbers and operations, Fundamental theorem of
algebra, Binomial coefficients (and Pascals
Triangle), Mathematical induction and the
binomial theorem - Combinatorics and Finite Probability
- Combinations and permutations
12Critical Foundations of Algebra
- Fluency with Whole Numbers
- Fluency with Fractions
- Particular Aspects of Geometry and Measurement
\
13National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Whole Numbers
- 1) By the end of Grade 3, students should be
proficient with the addition and subtraction of
whole numbers. - 2) By the end of Grade 5, students should be
proficient with multiplication and division of
whole numbers.
14National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Fractions
- 1) By the end of Grade 4, students should be able
to identify and represent fractions and decimals,
and compare them on a number line or with other
common representations of fractions and decimals. - 2) By the end of Grade 5, students should be
proficient with comparing fractions and decimals
and common percents, and with addition and
subtraction of fractions and decimals. - 3) By the end of Grade 6, students should be
proficient with multiplication and division of
fractions and decimals.
15National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Fractions
- 4) By the end of Grade 6, students should be
proficient with all operations involving positive
and negative integers. -
- 5) By the end of Grade 7, students should be
proficient with all operations involving positive
and negative fractions. - 6) By the end of Grade 7, students should be able
to solve problems involving percent, ratio, and
rate and extend this work to proportionality.
16National Mathematics Advisory PanelBenchmarks
Geometry and Measurement
- 1) By the end of Grade 5, students should be able
to solve problems involving perimeter and area of
triangles and all quadrilaterals having at least
one pair of parallel sides (i.e., trapezoids). - 2) By the end of Grade 6, students should be able
to analyze the properties of two-dimensional
shapes and solve problems involving perimeter and
area, and analyze the properties of
three-dimensional shapes and solve problems
involving surface area and volume. - 3) By the end of Grade 7, students should be
familiar with the relationship between similar
triangles and the concept of the slope of a line.
17Reflection on the NMAP Final Report
- Which of the findings and recommendations
strike you as unusual or particularly important? - How might the findings and recommendations of
the National Mathematics Advisory Panel affect
discussions and decisions about standards,
curriculum, and testing in WA?
18Legislative Actions in 2008
- Legislative actions were completed prior to the
release of the Final Report of the National
Mathematics Advisory Panel. - Implementation of these actions may be
influenced by that Final Report.
19Status of Legislation Standards (Bill 6534)
- By May 15
- receive report of national consultants review
of Feb 29 version of Standards - consult WA Mathematics Panel about the
consultants recommendations - hold public hearing
- direct modifications to consultants report
- forward final report and recommendations to
OSPI for implementation
20Status of Legislation Standards (Bill 6534)
- By July 01
- OSPI shall revise the mathematics standards
to conform precisely to and incorporate each of
the recommendations of the State Board of
Education - By July 31
- approve adoption of the standards
- OR
- develop a plan to do this by September
21Probable Schedule Standards
- By April 17
- SBE approves K-8 standards
- By May 15
- SBE approves standards for Algebra 1,
Geometry, Integrated Mathematics 1, Integrated
Mathematics 2 - By July 15
- SBE approves standards for Algebra 2,
Integrated Mathematics 3
22Status of Legislation WASL (Bill 3166)
- shorten the tests for grades 3-8
- create diagnostic tools (NOTE diagnostic is
not defined) - by 2010 create end-of-course tests for Algebra
1 and Integrated Mathematics 1 - by 2011 create end-of-course tests for Geometry
and Integrated Mathematics 2 - in 2013 end-of-course tests may substitute for
10th grade WASL - in 2014 end-of-course tests replace the 10th
grade WASL
23Issues of Scheduling WASL
- In order to have end-of-course tests ready for
use in Spring 2010, the standards for Algebra 1
and Integrated Mathematics 1 must be approved by
May 15. - Any delay beyond that date would put new
creation of new tests in jeopardy. - This puts some urgency into the discussion of
standards by the State Board of Education.
24Graduation Requirements State Board of Education
- 3rd mathematics credit required for graduation
in 2013 - The State Board of Education will determine the
list of permissible courses. - The expectation is that these decisions will be
made in July 2008.
25Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Organization
- K-8 organized by grade
- Core Content, Additional Key Content, Core
Processes - High School organized by courses
- Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2
- Mathematics 1, Mathematics 2, Mathematics 3
- also, topics for possible 4th year courses
26Review of the Feb 29 Version
- The State Board of Education asked Linda
Plattner to review the Feb 29 version of the
Revised K-12 Mathematics Standards. Report
submitted to Legislature on March 10, 2008. - Linda Plattner reviewed the GLEs in Summer 2007
and the Jan 21 version of the Revised K-12
Mathematics Standards. - The Legislature delayed action until after
Linda Plattners review of the Feb 29 version.
27Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
- We first want to commend the substantial work of
Washington educators and community leaders, OSPI,
and the Dana Center. Washington has broken new
ground in its approach to organizing grade level
content by priorities rather than mathematical
strands. The writing teams were inclusive, the
stakeholder feedback extensive. The document
clearly is thoughtful and written with
mathematical expertise.
28Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
- Standards inherently involve tensions. They are
goal statements about which different people,
even different experts, will have varied
opinions. They require negotiations, and
represent compromises among varied legitimate
participants and groups. - Confrey, Jere, Tracing the Evolution of
Mathematics Content Standards in the United
States Looking Back and Projecting Forward
towards National Standards, a paper prepared for
the Conference on K12 Mathematics Curriculum
Standards, sponsored by CSMC, NCTM, Achieve,
College Board, MAA, ASA (February 2007).
29Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
- The new mathematics standards for grades K8 are
very close to excellent. These standards do
compare favorably with the best in the nation and
the world. The Performance Expectations are
specific, measurable, important mathematical
topics that are both focused at particular grades
and developed across grade levels.
30Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Review
- While they the high school standards are much
improved from OSPI's January version, further
revision is needed. Some areas, such as
occasional imprecision of language, is similar to
grades K8 and just as easily fixed. Other areas,
such as missing content and content organization,
are more problematic.
31Revised K-12 Mathematics StandardsFeb 29
version Plattner Recommendations
- 1. An exemplar review of the OSPI February
standards K8 and 912, similar to last year's
comparison to other states, countries and
national frameworks using the nine criteria to
provide external validation that these are the
best standards. In order to compress the timeline
we suggest fewer grade levels and fewer
documents. - 2. Substantive edit for grades K8. The content
is very good language is almost ready. These
standards are so close that work could be
completely very quickly. - 3. A revision of the high school standards.
The core content of the subjects is in the
document and many of the examples are excellent.
The language needs to be tightened and there is
some more work to be done on the content. This
means it will take slightly longer than the grade
K8 work.
32The Substance of the Revised Standards
- Given the pivotal role of standards in testing,
curriculum review, and instruction, lets turn
our attention to what mathematics Washington
educators have said is important for students to
learn. - Attend first to K-8 standards.
33Depth of Content
- Where is the first mention of each of the
following ideas? Where is the last mention? - multiplication of whole numbers
- mean of a set of data
- area formulas for triangles
- What do you notice about the range of grades for
these topics?
34Debriefing Depth of Content
- multiplication of whole numbers
- mean of a set of data
- area formulas for triangles
35Grade Band Discussions K-2, 3-5, 6-8
- What key mathematics would students in your grade
band learn for each of the following? - operations, geometry, data
- How do the main ideas develop across your grade
band for each of the following? - operations, geometry, data
36Debriefing Grade Band Discussions
37Student Learning
- What is the image of mathematics that the
Standards for this grade band communicate? - What is the residual learning that students
will have as they leave this grade band?
38Debriefing Student Learning
- image of mathematics
- residual learning
39High School Standards
- If Algebra 2 is for ALL students, what content
should it include? - If Algebra 2 is for COLLEGE-BOUND students,
what content should it include? - What options to Algebra 2 should there be?
40Revised High School Standards
- How well do the High School Revised Mathematics
Standards reflect what students should know? - Tentatively, Algebra 2 standards should be
approved about July 2008.
41Closing Comments
- Share this information with colleagues.
- Communicate with Legislators and members of the
State Board of Education about what should be in
Washington States Revised K-12 Mathematics
Standards. -
- Support local teachers as they learn about the
revised standards and begin to implement them.