Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements II

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Preferred Customer Last modified by: Robb Koether Created Date: 1/12/2002 3:26:19 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Preferr873
Learn more at: https://people.hsc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements II


1
Introduction to Predicates and Quantified
Statements II
  • Lecture 10
  • Section 2.2
  • Fri, Feb 2, 2007

2
Negation of a Universal Statement
  • What would it take to make the statement
    Everybody likes me false?

3
Negation of a Universal Statement
  • What would it take to make the statement
    Somebody likes me false?

4
Negations of Universal Statements
  • The negation of the statement
  • ?x ? S, P(x)
  • is the statement
  • ?x ? S, ?P(x).
  • If ?x ? R, x2 gt 10 is false, then ?x ? R, x2 ?
    10 is true.

5
Negations of Existential Statements
  • The negation of the statement
  • ?x ? S, P(x)
  • is the statement
  • ?x ? S, ?P(x).
  • If ?x ? R, x2 lt 0 is false, then ?x ? R, x2 ?
    0 is true.

6
Example
  • Are these statements equivalent?
  • Any investment plan is not right for all
    investors.
  • There is no investment plan that is right for
    all investors.

7
The Word Any
  • We should avoid using the word any when writing
    quantified statements.
  • The meaning of any is ambiguous.
  • You cant put any person in that position and
    expect him to perform well.

8
Negation of a Universal Conditional Statement
  • How would you show that the statement
  • You cant get a good job without a good
    edikashun
  • is false?

9
Negation of a Universal Conditional Statement
  • The negation of ?x ? S, P(x) ? Q(x) is the
    statement
  • ?x ? S, ?(P(x) ? Q(x))
  • which is equivalent to the statement
  • ?x ? S, P(x) ? ?Q(x).

10
Negations and DeMorgans Laws
  • Let the domain be D x1, x2, , xn.
  • The statement ?x ? D, P(x) is equivalent to
  • P(x1) ? P(x2) ? ? P(xn).
  • Its negation is
  • ?P(x1) ? ?P(x2) ? ? ?P(xn),
  • which is equivalent to
  • ?x ? D, ?P(x).

11
Negations and DeMorgans Laws
  • The statement ?x ? D, P(x) is equivalent to
  • P(x1) ? P(x2) ? ? P(xn).
  • Its negation is
  • ?P(x1) ? ?P(x2) ? ? ?P(xn),
  • which is equivalent to
  • ?x ? D, ?P(x).

12
Evidence Supporting Universal Statements
  • Consider the statement
  • All crows are black.
  • Let C(x) be the predicate x is a crow.
  • Let B(x) be the predicate x is black.
  • The statement can be written formally as
  • ?x, C(x) ? B(x)
  • or
  • C(x) ? B(x).

13
Supporting Universal Statements
  • Question What would constitute statistical
    evidence in support of this statement?

14
Supporting Universal Statements
  • The statement is logically equivalent to
  • ?x, B(x) ? C(x)
  • or
  • B(x) ? C(x).
  • Question What would constitute statistical
    evidence in support of this statement?

15
Algebra Puzzler
  • Find the error(s) in the following solution.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com