Title: Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements II
1Introduction to Predicates and Quantified
Statements II
- Lecture 10
- Section 2.2
- Fri, Feb 2, 2007
2Negation of a Universal Statement
- What would it take to make the statement
Everybody likes me false?
3Negation of a Universal Statement
- What would it take to make the statement
Somebody likes me false?
4Negations of Universal Statements
- The negation of the statement
- ?x ? S, P(x)
- is the statement
- ?x ? S, ?P(x).
- If ?x ? R, x2 gt 10 is false, then ?x ? R, x2 ?
10 is true.
5Negations of Existential Statements
- The negation of the statement
- ?x ? S, P(x)
- is the statement
- ?x ? S, ?P(x).
- If ?x ? R, x2 lt 0 is false, then ?x ? R, x2 ?
0 is true.
6Example
- Are these statements equivalent?
- Any investment plan is not right for all
investors. - There is no investment plan that is right for
all investors.
7The Word Any
- We should avoid using the word any when writing
quantified statements. - The meaning of any is ambiguous.
- You cant put any person in that position and
expect him to perform well.
8Negation of a Universal Conditional Statement
- How would you show that the statement
- You cant get a good job without a good
edikashun - is false?
9Negation of a Universal Conditional Statement
- The negation of ?x ? S, P(x) ? Q(x) is the
statement - ?x ? S, ?(P(x) ? Q(x))
- which is equivalent to the statement
- ?x ? S, P(x) ? ?Q(x).
10Negations and DeMorgans Laws
- Let the domain be D x1, x2, , xn.
- The statement ?x ? D, P(x) is equivalent to
- P(x1) ? P(x2) ? ? P(xn).
- Its negation is
- ?P(x1) ? ?P(x2) ? ? ?P(xn),
- which is equivalent to
- ?x ? D, ?P(x).
11Negations and DeMorgans Laws
- The statement ?x ? D, P(x) is equivalent to
- P(x1) ? P(x2) ? ? P(xn).
- Its negation is
- ?P(x1) ? ?P(x2) ? ? ?P(xn),
- which is equivalent to
- ?x ? D, ?P(x).
12Evidence Supporting Universal Statements
- Consider the statement
- All crows are black.
- Let C(x) be the predicate x is a crow.
- Let B(x) be the predicate x is black.
- The statement can be written formally as
- ?x, C(x) ? B(x)
- or
- C(x) ? B(x).
13Supporting Universal Statements
- Question What would constitute statistical
evidence in support of this statement?
14Supporting Universal Statements
- The statement is logically equivalent to
- ?x, B(x) ? C(x)
- or
- B(x) ? C(x).
- Question What would constitute statistical
evidence in support of this statement?
15Algebra Puzzler
- Find the error(s) in the following solution.