Developing Ontologies for Knowledge Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Developing Ontologies for Knowledge Management

Description:

Developing Ontologies for Knowledge Management Atilla EL Dept. of Computer Engineering Eastern Mediterranean University 25/04/'07 updated 15/04708 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Ati105
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Developing Ontologies for Knowledge Management


1
Developing Ontologies for Knowledge Management
  • Atilla ELÇI
  • Dept. of Computer Engineering
  • Eastern Mediterranean University

2
Knowledge Management Topics
  • Motivation
  • Terms Definitions
  • Roles of ontologies
  • PROTON ontology as bases for KM / SemWeb Apps

3
Motivation
  • Knowledge Representation (KR)
  • A world view Building models of a
    domain/problem which allow for automatic
    reasoning and interpretation.
  • gt Formal semantics (Ontology!)
  • gt Machine-interpretable meaning
  • Semantic repository
  • Storage, querying, and management of structured
    data
  • DBMS vs Ontology-based
  • O-B provides depth of meaning not available
    through DBMS

4
Terminology KM views
  • What Is Knowledge Management by the The Knowledge
    Management Forum (KMForum)
  • Read through these personal views on K KM
  • Note the diversity of views interests
  • Contrast cross-check definitions of some
    viewers.

5
Terminology
  • Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI, DC)
    interoperable online metadata standards
  • Dataset a set of structured data (list, table,
    DB, etc.) useful for direct software processing
  • Ontology
  • Paradigm for KR in AI.
  • Conceptual schemata
  • Formal ontology as logical formalism as in OWL
  • Schemata or inteligent views over information
    resources
  • For indexing, querying, and referencing
    non-ontological datasets
  • For DB, Document Mngt Sys, Catalog, OLAP,

6
Terminology (continued)
  • Ontology classification based on generality of
    conceptualization
  • Upper-level ontology
  • A general model suitable for large variety of
    tasks, domains, and application areas. Can be
    used to line up independently developed
    ontologies if linked to it.
  • Domain ontology
  • For specific domain of interest
  • App / Task ontology
  • For a specific range of applications / tasks.
  • Knowledge base (KB)
  • A dataset with formal semantics and knowledge
    representation allowing automatic inference.
  • Ontology OltC, R, I, Agt where
  • C is the set of classes
  • R is the set of relations among the classes
  • I is the set of instances from the domain.
    Instances belong to classes
  • A is the set of axioms (say, business rules).

7
Terminology (continued)
  • Ref ontology definition as O-grammar, the issue
    of what is instance what is schema definition may
    not always easily resolved.
  • Data qualia A data quale is an orthogonal
    quality of data that may be used for independent
    classification
  • Semantics whether it is formally represented
  • Structure if the data is formally structured
  • Schema data that determines shape and/or meaning
    of ontology data.
  • Sorts of data (_ stands for any value not
    determined)
  • Data (_,_,_), ie. Any sort of collection of data
  • Dataset (_,structured,_)
  • Knowledge Base (semantic,structured,_)
  • Ontology (semantic,structured,schema)
  • Non-semantic schemata (nonsemantic,structured,sch
    ema)
  • Database (nonsemantic,structured,schema)
  • Mixed datasets (_,structured,schemanon-schema)
  • Content (_,non-structured,_)
  • Metadata data on data, annotation, ... How to
    represent in (?,?,?)?
  • Semi-structured data

8
Terminology (continued)
  • Sorts of data (continued)
  • Semi-structured data
  • KR/NLP ? Docs containing free text fragments in
    structured according to some schema
  • DB ? Data of non-relational data model.
  • Ref. Fig. 7.2- Structured vs semantic positioning
    of various sorts of data.

9
Roles of Ontologies
  • Ontology as Database Schema
  • May not contain instance data.
  • Such as RDBMS schema.
  • Ontology as Topic Hierarchy
  • Classification for various purposes
  • DCMI and library classification
  • Yahoo DMoz taxonomies for Web data
  • See Section 4 in this for depth of Yahoo!
    Directory.
  • Compare Topic-Ontology versus Schema-Ontology
    (Sect. 7.5)
  • Ontology as Enterprise Resource Model
  • Ref. Ontolog Database Ontology Mini-Series.

10
Mapping Querying Disparate Knowledge Bases
  • Self study Davies 6.3

11
PROTON (PROTo ONtology) Ontology
  • A light-weight uppper-level ontology to serve as
    model bases for information science community
    for, for example
  • Seed for ontology generation
  • Automatic entity recognition information
    extraction
  • Metadata generation / semantic annotation.
  • Design Rationale
  • For usage in KM SemWeb appls
  • Light-weight for being unrestrictive
  • Prefers not to deal with time space
  • Low-cost of adoption maintenance
  • Scalable reasoning

12
PROTON (contiuned)
  • Consists of 300 classes 100 properties for
  • Semantic annotation
  • Indexing, and retrieval.
  • Design principles
  • Domain independence
  • Light-weight logical definitions
  • Alignment with popular metadata standards
  • Good collection of named entity types (people,
    organizations, locations, numbers, dates,
    addresses.
  • Structure
  • In OWL Lite
  • In four modules System, Top, Upper, and
    Knowledge Management (KM)
  • Organized á la DILIGENT Methodology,

13
PROTON (contiuned)
  • Scope
  • Developed in the SEKT Project through sampling of
    a corpus of general news.
  • General entity types appearing commonly (Person,
    Location, Organization, Money, Date, ...) are in
    PROTON Top.
  • KM aspects stems from
  • KIMO of KIM Project
  • OpenCyc
  • Wordnet
  • DOLCE
  • EuroWordnet
  • Voluntary compliance with
  • Dublin Core
  • Automatic Content Extraction annotation types
  • Alexandria Digital Library Feature Type Thesaurus
  • Future compliance with FOAF and other popular
    standars ontologies.

14
PROTON (contiuned)
  • Architecture
  • Site at Semanticweb.org
  • Organized in three levels Basic, Top, Upper
  • In four modules
  • System (basic protons...) application ontology
    meant for use by ontology-based software
  • Top (top protont...) abstractions
  • Upper (upper protonu...) specific cases
  • KM (upper protonkm...) specific cases

15
PROTON (contiuned)
  • KM module for application-specific extension of
    PROTON
  • Information Spacecollection of themed info
    resources
  • Software Agent specialized Agent
  • User User and UserProfile
  • Profile
  • User Profile
  • Mention name droppings, references to (private)
    instances
  • Weighted Term relates objects to numbers
  • Device references to user devices.

16
Organizations
  • The Knowledge Management Forum (KMForum)
  • Virtual community of practice focused on
    furthering fundamental theories, methods and
    practices. Features archives and news.
  • What Is Knowledge Management
  • KM Forum
  • Boston Knowledge Management Forum A Community of
    Practice Learning and Working in the Knowledge
    Management Community
  • KnowledgeBoard
  • Forum to establish a community and to support and
    identify commonality in terminology, application
    and implementation. Features news, workshops, a
    library, ...

17
Conferences
  • Knowledge Representation Ontology Workshop (KROW
    2008).
  • Eleventh International Conference on Principles
    of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR
    2008),
  • Sydney, Australia, September 16 - 19, 2008

18
Commercial Conferences
  • Knowledge Base Publishing course series of the
    Montague Institute includes articles
  • Introduction to Knowledge Base Publishing
  • Taxonomies, search Sharepoint
  • Metadata and search
  • Integrating taxonomies
  • Information modeling and metadata management
  • See also Roundtables, for example the following
  • Benchmarking Sharepoint for KM (December 12,
    2007)
  • Six weeks to the Semantic Web (November 7, 2007)
  • Integrating folksonomies with Google (October 17,
    2007)
  • Migrating metadata to the Semantic Web (September
    5, 2007)

19
References
  • John Davies, Rudi Studer, Paul Warren (Editors)
    Semantic Web Technologies Trends and Research in
    Ontology-based Systems, John Wiley Sons (July
    11, 2006). ISBN 0470025964. Ch. 7. pp. 115-138.
  • W3C Semantic Web Tools Wiki page
  • Check ...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com