Abbington v. Schempp - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Abbington v. Schempp

Description:

Abbington v. Schempp Schools can t require Bible reading or reciting the Lord s Prayer. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: jre129
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Abbington v. Schempp


1
Abbington v. Schempp
  • Schools cant require Bible reading or reciting
    the Lords Prayer.

2
Wisconsin v. Yoder
  • Amish Parents cant be required to send their
    children to school past 8th grade.

3
Westside Schools v. Mergens
  • Religious organizations can meet in public
    schools in same manner as other student groups
  • Court cited the Equal Access Act

4
Sante Fe ISD v. Doe
  • Public school students may not lead prayer at
    football games

5
West Virginia v. Barnette
  • Patriotism can be achieved without forcing people
    to violate their religious beliefs

6
Epperson v. Arkansas
  • States cant ban the teaching of evolution in
    public schools

7
Everson v. Bd. Of Education
  • States can pay for busing students to parochial
    schools

8
Engel v. Vitale
  • Prayer in public schools is unconstitutional

9
Schenk v. U.S.
  • Developed the clear and present danger test
  • Seditious speech- speech advocating the overthrow
    of the govt or resistance to lawful authority

Tom Clancy Clear and Present Danger
10
Bethel School Dist. V. Fraser
  • Schools may punish students for lewd, or indecent
    speech at school events

11
NY Times v. U.S.
  • Prohibiting the publication of the Pentagon
    Papers would be prior restraint

12
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
  • School officials can restrict student expression
    in school newspapers

13
Miller v. California
  • Local communities can set their own obscenity
    standards

14
Gitlow v. New York
  • Court ruled that free speech is a basic right
    that states can not deny incorporated the bill
    of rights

15
DeJong v. Oregon
  • Assembly for lawful discussion can not be made a
    crime

16
Sheppard v. Maxwell
  • Set ways to limit media coverage of trials
  • Sequester-isolate a jury during trial
  • Gag order- court order prohibiting publication of
    trial information

17
Mapp v. Ohio
  • Extended the exclusionary rule to state trials

18
Miranda v. Arizona
  • A person must be clearly informed of their rights
    before questioning by the police
  • The Miranda Act

19
California v. Acevedo
  • Police can search a car without a warrant if
    there is probable cause

20
Gideon v. Wainwright
  • States must provide the accused an attorney even
    if they cant afford one

21
Escobedo v. Illinois
  • A person has the right to an attorney as soon as
    they become a suspect

22
New Jersey v. TLO
  • School officials do not need a warrant to search
    a student at school.

23
Brown v. Bd. Of Education
  • Segregated schools are unconstitutional

Black School
White School
24
Plessy v. Ferguson
  • States could segregate the races if separate but
    equal facilities were provided.


White School
Black School
25
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
  • Prohibited racial discrimination by those who
    provide goods, services, and facilities to the
    public

Atlanta
26
Univ. Cal vs. Bakke
  • Race is one characteristic that can be considered
    for college admission but quota systems are
    unconstitutional

27
Roe v. Wade
  • The right to privacy encompasses a womans right
    to abortion

28
Reed v. Reed
  • Discrimination on the basis of sex violates the
    constitution

VS.
29
Bill of Rights
  • Be sure to know the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 7th, and 8th
    Amendments to the Constitution.
  • Be able to list the 5 freedoms guaranteed by the
    1st Amendment
  • List 5 protections from the 5th Amend.

30
Miscellaneous
  • Know the 14th Amendment and its importance.
  • Name the 4 parts of the Miranda Act
  • The name of the first 10 Amendments
  • Equal Access Act

31
Vocabulary
  • Exclusionary Rule (Mapp v. Ohio)
  • Libel
  • Slander
  • Shield law
  • Double jeopardy
  • Eminent domain
  • Prior restraint (NY Times v. US)

32
  • Incorporation (Gitlow v. NY)
  • Precedent
  • Symbolic speech
  • Gag order
  • Pure speech
  • fighting words- insults to provoke violence

33
  • Seditious speech
  • Human rights
  • sequester
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com