Supreme Court Case Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Supreme Court Case Review

Description:

Supreme Court Case Review Rights Checks and Balances Equal Treatment under the Law Established the Courts Power of Judicial Review Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:415
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: buncombe6
Category:
Tags: case | court | review | supreme

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Supreme Court Case Review


1
Supreme Court Case Review
  • Rights
  • Checks and Balances
  • Equal Treatment under the Law

2
Established the Courts Power of Judicial Review
  • Marbury v. Madison
  • McCulloch v. Maryland
  • State v. Mann
  • Leandro v. North Carolina

3
The Necessary and Proper Clause was Interpreted
to include creation of a National Bank in the case
  • Marbury v.Madison
  • McCulloch v. Maryland
  • State v. Mann
  • Leandro v. North Carolina

4
The ability to review laws and declare them
unconstitutional is called
  • Veto power
  • Apportionment
  • Judicial Review
  • Impeachment

5
The Elastic Clause is also known as
  • Judicial Review
  • Executive Order
  • Implied Powers Clause
  • Writ of Habeas Corpus

6
The Case in which the NC Supreme Court required
schools to provide an equal basic education
  • State v. Mann
  • Leandro v. North Carolina
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools
  • Baker v. Carr

7
State Supremacy over local laws was established
in the case
  • State v. Mann
  • Leandro v. North Carolina
  • Marbury v. Madison
  • McCulloch v. Maryland

8
National Supremacy over State Laws was upheld in
the case involving the National Bank called
  • Marbury v. Madison
  • McCulloch v. Maryland
  • State v. Mann
  • Leandro v. North Carolina

9
Separate but Equal as a doctrine was declared
unconstitutional in the case
  • Marbury v. Madison
  • McCulloch v. Maryland
  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
  • Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Schools

10
Voting Districts should be of equal population
according to
  • Marbury v. Madison
  • Korematsu v. United States
  • Reynolds v. Simms
  • Baker v. Carr

11
Gerrymandering to benefit a racial group is
unconstitutional
  • Baker v. Carr
  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS
  • Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States
  • Reynolds v. Simms

12
The amendment that requires states to ensure
equal treatment under the law and due process of
the law
  • 10
  • 14
  • 22
  • 17

13
Which right of Japanese American citizens was
suspended according to the case Korematsu v.
United States
  • Freedom of speech
  • Writ of Habeas Corpus
  • Freedom from a bill of attainder
  • Freedom from double jeopardy

14
Burning a flag as a form of symbolic speech was
protected in
  • Texas v. Johnson
  • Tinker v. Des Moines
  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
  • Gitlow v. New York

15
Which case protects a students right to symbolic
speech?
  • Texas v. Johnson
  • Tinker v. Des Moines
  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
  • 4. New Jersey v. TLO

16
Student Search Rights were reviewed in the case
  • Texas v. Johnson
  • Tinker v. Des Moines
  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
  • New Jersey v. TLO

17
According to the decision in Mapp v. Ohio, any
evidence seized without a warrant
  • To be considered by the jury
  • To be considered by the judge
  • To be excluded from the court
  • To be held in an evidence locker for 10 years

18
A persons right to remain silent was extended by
requiring that police explain a persons right in
  • Mapp v. Ohio
  • New Jersey v. TLO
  • Gideon v. Wainwright
  • Miranda v. Arizona

19
States must appoint an attorney for those who
cannot afford one according to
  • Mapp v. Ohio
  • New Jersey v. TLO
  • Gideon v. Wainwright
  • Miranda v. Arizona

20
The separation of church and state is upheld in
the decision
  • Tinker v. Des Moines
  • Wisconsin v. Yoder
  • Wallace v. Jaffree
  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

21
What is Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier about?
  • Students right to free press
  • Use of prior restraint by a school official
  • Limited rights of students in order to protect
    privacy rights and a learning environment
  • All of the above

22
When a local government placed a nativity scene
on the courthouse lawn, the Supreme Court said
they violated
  • Freedom of religious expression
  • Freedom from religious establishment

23
Freedom of Religious Expression Includes
  • Choosing ones own faith
  • Choosing to practice religious rituals that are
    not harmful to others
  • Choosing to symbolically express ones religious
    faith
  • All of the above

24
Freedom from Religious Establishment includes
  • Government may not promote or establish a
    religion for the people
  • Government may not establish the religious
    rituals for people such as prayer time, Bible
    readings, holiday rituals
  • Government may not promote symbolically a
    religion
  • All of the above

25
According to Lemon V. Kurtzman a government could
give to a parochial (religious) school if
  • The was not for a religious purpose
    intentionally
  • The would not promote a religious purpose
  • Giving the money would not cause an excessive
    entanglement between church and state
  • All of the above

26
In Everson v. Board of Education, tax dollars
spent for this did not violate the establishment
clause
  • To hire teachers in a religious school
  • To pay for religious texts in a school
  • To pay for bus fare for students to attend school
  • To pay for religious symbols in the school

27
Forcing someone to say the pledge was found to be
a violation of a persons freedom to religious
expression in
  • Abbingdon v. Schempp
  • Schenck v. United States
  • West Virginia v. Barnette
  • Alleghany v. ACLU

28
The Presidents use of Executive Privilege (to
keep a secret) was limited by the
Supreme Court Ruling in
  • U.S. v. Nixon
  • U.S. v. New York Times

29
The U.S. governments ability to use prior
restraint was limited by the Supreme Courts
ruling in
  • US v. Nixon
  • US v. New York Times

30
What is prior restraint?
  • Ability of a government official to prevent
    something from being published
  • Ability of a government to punish someone for
    publishing information that violated national
    security (treason)

31
When can the government use prior restraint?
  • Whenever it wants
  • When the information to be published would harm
    national security
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com