Soil Water Repellence Long-term management solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Soil Water Repellence Long-term management solutions

Description:

Soil Water Repellence Long-term management solutions Stephen Davies, Paul Blackwell (DAFWA Geraldton) Craig Scanlan, Breanne Best (DAFWA Northam) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Areva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Soil Water Repellence Long-term management solutions


1
Soil Water RepellenceLong-term management
solutions
  • Stephen Davies, Paul Blackwell (DAFWA Geraldton)
  • Craig Scanlan, Breanne Best (DAFWA Northam)

2
Managing Water Repellence
Mitigation Options Amelioration Options
Improved furrow sowing Clay spreading or delving
Banded wetting agents Soil inversion (Mouldboard plough)
Blanket-applied wetting agents Rotary spading
Full retention/minimal disturbance
On-row seeding
3
Wheat yield responses 2007-11
Mouldboard Mouldboard Rotary Spader Rotary Spader
Yield response (kg/ha) Range, kg/ha (number) Yield response (kg/ha) Range, kg/ha (number)
Year 1 583 0-1965 (17) 609 -656-2000 (17)
Years 2/3 259 0-633 (9) 204 41-500 (4)
Years 4/5 764 378 1150 (2) ? ?
4
Yield response summary
  • 15 of 17 trials had good yield responses in year
    1
  • Good mouldboard plough response 4 5 years
  • Risks seeding depth problems, sandblasting,
    haying off and recompaction of loosened soil
  • Average lupin yield response in MB 405kg/ha over
    7 trials
  • Lupin response at Badgi in 2011 spaded in 2009
    was 500 kg/ha

5
GSR 324 mm MARCHAGEE
Spaded 2011 Biomass 7.7 t/ha 326 heads/m2 Grain
yield 3.3 t/ha
Knife Points Biomass 3.5 t/ha 193 heads/m2 Grain
yield 1.5 t/ha
6
(No Transcript)
7
West Moora Deep yellow Sandplain 334 mm GSR
Control
Spaded 900 kg/ha grain 2840 kg/ha biomass
Acknowledgement Erin Cahill AgVivo Moora
8
Badgingarra Pale Deep Sand 485 mm GSR
Untreated Control
Mouldboard in 2010 1000 kg/ha lupin in 2011
9
Visual changes in soil colour and root density
Untreated
10
Visual changes in soil colour and root density
Rotary Spader
11
Visual changes in soil colour and root density
Mouldboard Plough
12
Root distribution
13
Pale deep sand, Badgingarra
Buried topsoil
14
Established late 1980s, organic carbon measured
in 2003
15
(No Transcript)
16
Mouldboard
Nil Mouldboard
Wheat yield increases 250 kg/ha in 2010 950 kg/ha
in 2011
gt 800 brome/m2
0 brome/m2
17
Modified Skimmers
18
Average leaf area diseased (average of top 4
leaves) for Calingiri wheat sown on 8 June
Soil Treatment Soil Treatment Soil Treatment
Crop Growth Stage Days after sowing Nil Rotary Spader Mouldboard Plough l.s.d. (5)
Z37 (Stem elongation) 72 17 15 9 4
Z55 (Ear emergence) 118 49 39 35 10
19
(No Transcript)
20
Negative Responses
Control Mouldboard Plough Rotary Spader
Grain Yield (t/ha) 2.9 2.9 2.4
Protein () 10.6 11.0 13.4
Screenings () 4.6 8.8 15.2
Extractable Aluminium (mg/kg) 8.0 _at_ 20-30 cm gt12
_at_ 40-50 cm
Acknowledgement Bernie Quade, Landmark, Geraldton
21
Wind happens
Neridup 2011
Badgingarra 2011
Mouldboard
Control
Photos Colin DeGrussa
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Summary
  • Generally good yield responses
  • Best on soils with reasonable potential deep
    sandy earths, loose sandy gravel , deep sandy
    duplex
  • Haying off risk check subsoil for constraints,
    variety selection, seeding rate?, N rate
  • Maximise opportunities incorporate lime,
    micronutrients and other amendments weed
    control break crops

25
1965 kg/ha
26
Clay Spreading 2 systems
High rates gt250 t/ha
Moderate rates lt150 t subsoil/ha
27
All shallow incorporation 100-150mm
28
Badgingarra Clay Rate Demo Incorporation with
offset discs 100-150mm
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Clay-spreading on water repellent sands
  • Lower application rates (lt150 t/ha) with shallow
    (100-150mm) incorporation
  • Spread with a multi-spreader
  • Incorporated with offsets or even
    cultivator/combine tines.
  • Lower cost and less reliance on contractors.
  • Risk of poor yield responses in drier seasons are
    reduced.
  • Deep incorporation of lower application rates is
    not beneficial.
  • 2. Higher application rates (gt250 t/ha) with deep
    (200-250 mm) incorporation
  • Spread using carry graders then smudged
  • Incorporated with spader or another deep working
    implement.
  • Higher cost and reliance on contractors.
  • Potentially higher yield gains, particularly in
    wetter seasons or environments.
  • Shallow incorporation of higher clay rates is
    risky

33
Funded by GRDC and DAFWA (DAW00204) Agronomic
strategies for water repellent soils
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com