Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal

Description:

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal s wager By David Kelsey Pascal Blaise Pascal lived from 1623-1662. He was a famous mathematician and a gambler. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: DavidK273
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 6 Pascal


1
Introduction to PhilosophyLecture 6Pascals
wager
  • By David Kelsey

2
Pascal
  • Blaise Pascal lived from 1623-1662.
  • He was a famous mathematician and a gambler.
  • He invented the theory of probability.

3
Probability anddecision theory
  • Pascal thinks that we cant know for sure whether
    God exists.
  • Decision theory used to study how to make
    decisions under uncertainty, I.e. when you dont
    know what will happen.
  • Lakers or Knicks
  • Rain coat
  • Rule for action when making a decision under a
    time of uncertainty always perform that action
    that has the highest expected utility!

4
Expected Utility
  • The expected utility for any action the payoff
    you can expect to gain on each attempt if you
    continued to make attempts...
  • It is the average gain or loss per attempt.
  • To compute the expected value of an action
  • ((The prob. of a success) x (The payoff of
    success)) ((the prob. of a loss) x (the payoff
    of a loss))
  • Which game would you play?
  • The Big 12 pay 1 to roll two dice.
  • Lucky 7 pay 1 to roll two dice.
  • E.V. of Big 12
  • E.V. of Lucky 7

5
Payoff matrices
  • Gamble Part of the idea of decision theory is
    that you can think of any decision under
    uncertainty as a kind of gamble.
  • Payoff Matrix used to represent a scenario in
    which you have to make a decision under
    uncertainty.
  • On the left our alternative courses of action.
  • At the top the outcomes.
  • Next to each outcome add the probability that it
    will occur.
  • Under each outcome the payoff for that outcome
  • Calling a coin flip for a quarter
  • The coin comes up heads ___ It comes up
    tails ___
  • You call heads ___
    ___
  • You call tails ___
    ___

6
The Expected Utility of the coin flip
  • So when making a decision under a time of
    uncertainty construct a payoff matrix
  • To compute the expected value of an action
  • ((The prob. of a success) x (The payoff of
    success)) ((the prob. of a loss) x (the payoff
    of a loss))
  • For our coin tossing example
  • The EU of calling head
  • The EU of calling tails
  • Which action has the higher expected utility?

7
Taking the umbrellato work
  • Do you take an umbrella to work? There is a 50
    chance it will rain.
  • Taking the Umbrella You will have to carry it
    around.
  • Payoff -5.
  • If it does rain you dont have the umbrella
    soaked
  • payoff of -50.
  • If it doesnt rain then you dont have to lug it
    around
  • payoff of 10.
  • It rains
    (___) It doesnt rain (___)
  • Take umbrella ___
    ___
  • Dont take umbrella ___
    ___
  • EU (take umbrella)
  • EU (dont take umbrella)

8
Pascals wager
  • Choosing to believe in God Pascal thinks that
    choosing whether to believe in God is like
    choosing whether to take an umbrella to work in
    Seattle.
  • It is a decision made under a time of
    uncertainty
  • But We can estimate the payoffs
  • Believing in God is a bit of pain whether or not
    he exists
  • An infinite Reward
  • Infinite Punishment

9
Pascals payoff matrix
  • God exists (___)
    God doesnt exist (___)
  • Believe ____
    ____
  • Dont believe ____
    ____
  • Assigning a probability to Gods existence
  • A bit tricky since we dont know.
  • For Pascal
  • since we dont know if God exists we know the
    probability of his existence is greater than 0.
  • EU (believe)
  • EU (dont believe)
  • Which action has greater expected utility?

10
Pascals argument
  • Pascals argument
  • 1. You can either believe in God or not believe
    in God.
  • 2. Believing in God has greater EU than
    disbelieving in God.
  • 3. You should perform whatever action has the
    greatest EU.
  • 4. Thus, you should believe in God.

11
Denying premise 1
  • The first move
  • Can you choose to believe?
  • The second move
  • Would God reward selfish believers?

12
Denying premise 2
  • Deny premise 2
  • Infinite payoffs make no sense
  • Can we even assign a non-zero probability to
    Gods existence?

13
The Many Gods objection
  • We could Deny premise 2 in another way
  • The Many Gods objection
  • Catholic God exists(L) Muslim God
    exists (M) Jewish God exists (N) God doesnt
    exist (1-L-M-N)
  • Believe in
  • Catholic God infinity neg. infinity
    neg. infinity -5
  • Muslim God neg. infinity infinity
    neg. infinity -5
  • Jewish God neg. infinity neg. infinity
    infinity -5
  • Dont believe neg. infinity neg. infinity
    neg. infinity 5

14
The Perverse Master
  • The perverse master objection
  • God exists (m) Perverse Master
    exists (n) Neither exists (1-m-n)
  • Believe infinity neg.
    infinity -5
  • Dont Believe neg. infinity infinity
    5
  • Disbelief seems no worse off than belief
  • Is it less likely that the perverse Master exists
    than does God?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com