Stratification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Stratification

Description:

Stratification Lon Cardon University of Oxford F:\lon\2001\stratification\stratification.ppt Population Stratification Consider trait distribution only Mean ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: LonC151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stratification


1
Stratification Lon Cardon University of
Oxford F\lon\2001\stratification\stratification
.ppt
2
Population Stratification
Consider trait distribution only
Mean differences in population substrata
These differences alone do not influence genetic
association under Ho
3
Single sample, unequal marker allele frequencies
Allele 1 Allele 2
f(2) gt f(1)
4
Single sample, unequal marker allele frequencies
Allele 1 Allele 2
f(1) gt f(2)
5
Stratified sample, equal marker allele frequencies
f(1) f(2) More 1 in high end More 2 in
low end. Association evidence
6
A Simple Model of Stratification
  • Consider
  • Two subsamples of equal sample size, but
    opposite allele frequencies (e.g., sample 1,
    5248 sample 2, 4852)
  • Within sample variance of the usual form of Va
    Vq(w) Ve, which is the same for both
    subsamples
  • Mean effects arising from a true QTL and
    stratification m mq ms
  • Then
  • Total variance in the combined sample has
    additional between-strata effects due to the
    QTL and stratification Vq(b) and Vs, so Vq
    Vq(b) Vq(w) and the total variance is Va Vq
    Vs Ve
  • Let Vq Vs 0.05 and p1, p2 vary from .1 to .9.

7
Stratification only
8
QTL effect only
9
QTL and stratification effects
10
Stratification Summary
Stratification not only yields increases in Type
I error Can also mask real effects Could see
true case/control results but no
TDT Difficult area of research.
11
Stratification detection/correction using the
Genome
Idea Dont necessarily need to use
family-based controls to detect/control for
stratification, can use other markers in cases
Pritchard Rosenberg (1999). Am J Hum
Genet Procedure Interested in candidate
marker, C1, genotype 40 other anonymous
(unlinked) markers, M1 .. M40. Calculate
association c2 for M1 .. M40. Test is on sum of
c2. If find evidence in background, worry about
stratification else, do not. Extensions Use
same idea to gain estimate of background
inflation factor of test statistic. Use this
factor to correct candidate gene
test. Pritchard et al. (2000) Am J Hum
Genet Devlin Roeder (1999) Biometrics
(Genomic Control) Bacanu, Devlin Roeder
(2000) Am J Hum Genet.
12
How bad is the stratification problem?
13
When is Stratification Tricky?
14
Stratification Detection Using the Genome
  • Promising idea to allow large studies of popln
    cohorts
  • Appears to detect large stratification
    differences easily
  • Small frequency differences much more difficult
    to detect. Can still obtain large (gt 2-fold)
    increases in Type I error rate.
  • Unfortunately, these differences may be
    precisely what we seek in complex traits
  • Tough cases many sub-strata, uninformative
    markers, effects of linked background markers.
    Watch this area very active
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com