Title: Genetics, society and insurance
1Genetics, society and insurance
USBO
2Professor John Harris (1945) University of
Manchester
3General ethical theories
- Utilitarian philosophy, e.g. John Harris
maximize overall happiness. - Ambition sensitive and endowment insensitive.
4This is not the way we do it
- Moral norms are different in different political
communities. - E.g. abortion/PND in China, India versus
abortion in Europa, US - E.g. euthanasia in US versus euthanasia in the
Netherlands
5Spheres of justice in liberal countries
Political sphere Majority decides Divine grace Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides Love and affection Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides Medical care Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides Education Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides Welfare Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides -- Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides -- Sphere of the market Free exchange
Political sphere Majority decides Sphere of the market Free exchange
6Sphere of medical care
- Distribution according to need
- (not according to wealth, guilt, not ambition
sensitive) - Genetic technology was first developed in this
sphere.
7Genetics in the sphere of health care
- IVF according to medical need
- PND for medical reasons
- PGD for medical reasons
8Crossing borders I
- Using medical technology (e.g. genetics) for non
medical purposes debate about eugenics
Political sphere Health care Market Free exchange
Political sphere Market Free exchange
9Crossing borders II
- Having a medical condition while being a consumer
- Some analogies
10Buying life insurance
- The history of genetic exceptionalism
- Ambition sensitive and endowment insensitive
after all?
Ine van Hoyweghen, Risks in the Making. Travels
in Life Insurance and Genetics 2007
11Abandoning genetic exceptionalism?
- What would happen? Small group? Large group?
- Is life insurance justly perceived as a market
good? If not, what is it?
12Conclusion
- Abandoning genetic exceptionalism seems the right
thing to do provided we manage to keep other
societal spheres (education, medical care,
welfare) free from market interference.