International Shale Development Optimization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

International Shale Development Optimization

Description:

... Quality Controls for Reservoir Productivity Defining Reservoir Quality TOC and maturation Mineralogy Pore Pressure Petrophysics: porosity, saturations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:251
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: klein2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Shale Development Optimization


1
International Shale Development Optimization
2
Unconventional Resources Development
Completion Quality
Reservoir Quality
3
Controls for Reservoir Productivity
  • Defining Reservoir Quality
  • TOC and maturation
  • Mineralogy
  • Pore Pressure
  • Petrophysics porosity, saturations,
    permeability, thickness
  • Gas in place adsorbed, interstitial
  • Defining Completion Quality
  • Structure faults, natural fractures, curvature
  • Hydraulic fracture containment geomechanical
    anisotropy, in-situ stress
  • Rock fracturability surface area per reservoir
    volume, texture, complexity
  • Retention of surface area and fracture
    conductivity stress, mechanical properties
  • Fracturing fluid sensitivity mineralogy, fluid
    chemistry

Good Reservoir Quality Good Completion Quality
Economic Success
4
Barnett
Eagle Ford (oil)
Marcellus
Haynesville
Woodford
Fayetteville
Eagle Ford
Shales are Vertically Variable
Each Shale is Unique
5
Core/Log Petrophysical Analysis
ECSXRD
SwPorosity
TOCPerm
Gasin Place
RHOBRHOM
Porosity
ELAN
Res
GR
TOC gt 2 wt
Effective phi 4 to 12 pu
Permeability gt 100 nd
Saturations Sliquid lt 45
6
Shale in Perspective Permeability
100 nD 0.0000001 D 1 ten millionth of a Darcy
7
Shale in Perspective Permeability
100 nD 0.0000001 D 1 ten millionth of a Darcy
Consequence of Extremely Low Matrix
Permeabilities
  • Majority of Pressure Drop at Fracture Face
  • At Initial Reservoir Pressure 10s of meters from
    fracture for years
  • Hydraulic Fracturing is a REQUIREMENT
  • Hydraulic Fracture Complexity can induce a
    pressure drop from multiple directions

Hydraulic Fractures at 250 ft Spacing (400 nd)
8
Shale in Perspective Large Stimulation Treatments
9
Initial Completion Quality Evaluation
Vertical Fracture Height Growth
80 m
10
Initial Completion Quality Evaluation
Vertical Fracture Conductivity
80 m
11
Completion Quality Variability
Fayetteville Shale Outcrop
Formation Micro-Imaging Logs (FMI)
Reservoir 2
Reservoir 3
Reservoir 1
12
Lateral Heterogeneity Horizontal Image Logs
Reservoir 1
600 m
Reservoir 2
500 m
Reservoir 3
700 m
13
Production Along the Lateral is Not Uniform
51
54
Well 1
14
31
Well 2
47
53
Well 3
Well 4
37
18
14
Addressing Variable Completion Quality
  • Wireline Horizontal Geomechanical Analysis
  • Quantify lateral stress variation
  • Indentify stress anisotropy
  • Group frac stages in Like Rock
  • Perforate similarly stressed rock

15
Addressing Variable Completion Quality
LWD Horizontal Geomechanical Analysis
A
H
G
16
Addressing Variable Completion Quality
Images can Identify Natural Fractures
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
17
Putting it All Together
  • Reservoir
  • Quality
  • Completion
  • Quality

18
Addressing Variable Completion QualityEagle Ford
Shale Example Geometrical Staging
SPE134827
19
Addressing Variable Completion QualityEagle Ford
Shale Example Selective Staging
SPE134827
20
Completion Optimization to Maximize Production
  • New wells used Reservoir Quality and Completion
    Quality to optimize completions
  • 33 increase in 3 month average cumulative BOE on
    new wells compared to offsets

SPE134827
21
3 Dimensional View of Reservoir
22
Integrating Seismic Attributes with Fracture
Geometry
SPE131779
Microseismic event locations along with the
azimuth of most negative curvature (arrows) and
magnitude of most positive curvature (background
color)
23
Coupling Fracture Geometry to Reservoir Simulation
  • Evaluation of Completion Quality

Unconventional Fracture Geometry Model
Eclipse Reservoir Simulation
24
Eclipse Reservoir Simulation Production History
Match
Production Match
Pressure Match
25
Reservoir Exploitation
Completion Quality Optimization
Estimated Ultimate Recoveries
Reservoir Development
Recovery Factors
26
What is the right model for success?
Model 1
Model 2
  • Minimum data utilized
  • Accept statistical variation in well performance
  • Compensate by drilling more wells
  • Factory approach to drilling and completion
  • Large footprint high rates large fluid volumes
  • Collect optimum data
  • Understand the reservoir and completion quality
  • Reservoir based well placement
  • Utilize technology to improve drilling
    completion efficiency
  • Reduced equipment footprint and fluid volumes

27
Thank You
Good Reservoir Quality Good Completion Quality
Economic Success
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com