Corrective Feedback: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Corrective Feedback:

Description:

The eight students of a high-beginner CEP class and their teacher. Collection of Data ... The high-beginner class. Explicit .5. x. x .5. Clarification ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:765
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: tcCol
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Corrective Feedback:


1
Corrective Feedback
2
Corrective Feedback
  • Does anyone take the time to notice?

3
  • A FEW THOUGHTS
  • and
  • THINGS TO REMEMBER

4
Schmidt (2001)
5
Schmidt (2001)
  • SLA is largely driven by what learners pay
    attention to and notice in target language input

6
Schmidt (2001)
  • SLA is largely driven by what learners pay
    attention to and notice in target language input
  • noticing is a necessary precursor to hypothesis
    formation and testing

7
  • Feedback may play an important role in helping
    students notice important forms

8
Problems with Uptake as a Measure of Feedback
Effectiveness
9
Problems with Uptake as a Measure of Feedback
Effectiveness
  • repetition may be inappropriate from a discourse
    perspective given that the teacher both
    initiates and completes the repair within a
    single move (Lyster, 2004)

10
Problems with Uptake as a Measure of Feedback
Effectiveness
  • repetition may be inappropriate from a discourse
    perspective given that the teacher both
    initiates and completes the repair within a
    single move (Lyster, 2004)
  • repetition may be indicative of nothing more than
    retrieval from short-term memory

11
Time, Time, Time
  • A seven second rule should be followed to
    enable students to move thoughts from brains to
    mouths (Amirault, 2003)

12
Time, Time, Time
  • A seven second rule should be followed to
    enable students to move thoughts from brains to
    mouths (Amirault, 2003)
  • Teachers need to extend wait-time between
    hearing learners response to feedback and
    topic-continuation moves in order to provide
    opportunities for learners to detect any
    input-output mismatches (Kim, 2004)

13
  • Shouldnt time also be allotted in order for
    corrective feedback to be moved from noticing to
    understanding?

14
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
  • How much wait-time do teachers in the
    communicative language classroom typically allot
    for students to notice corrective feedback?

15
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
  • How much wait-time do teachers in the
    communicative language classroom typically allot
    for students to notice corrective feedback?
  • Do these wait times vary in relation to the
    context of the lesson, learner level, or form of
    feedback?

16
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
  • How much wait-time do teachers in the
    communicative language classroom typically allot
    for students to notice corrective feedback?
  • Do these wait times vary in relation to the
    context of the lesson, learner level, or form of
    feedback?
  • How much time is typically necessary for students
    to voice uptake of corrective feedback?

17
Subjects
  • The four students of an upper-intermediate CEP
    class and their teacher
  • The eight students of a high-beginner CEP class
    and their teacher

18
Collection of Data
  • Notes were taken on
  • -near-quotes of the errors and corrections
  • -records of the quantity and type of error
    corrections
  • -rough estimates of the wait-time between these
    corrections and the continuation of the topic

19
Lyster and Ranta (1997) Means of drawing
attention to errors
  • Explicit correction
  • Recast
  • Clarification request
  • Metalinguistic feedback
  • Elicitation
  • Repetition

20
ResultsThe upper-intermediate class
21
(No Transcript)
22
ResultsThe high-beginner class
23
(No Transcript)
24
Findings
  • Research question 1-
  • How much wait-time do teachers in the
    communicative language classroom typically allot
    for students to notice corrective feedback?

25
Pauses were only given/takenafter two forms of
feedback
26
Pauses were only given/takenafter two forms of
feedback
  • Explicit correction

27
Pauses were only given/takenafter two forms of
feedback
  • Explicit correction
  • Clarification

28
Findings
  • Research question 3-
  • How much time is typically necessary for students
    to voice uptake of corrective feedback?

29
Findings
  • Research question 3-
  • How much time is typically necessary for students
    to voice uptake of corrective feedback?

30
Findings
  • Research question 2-
  • Do wait times vary in relation to the context of
    the lesson, learner level, or form of feedback?

31
Sources of Variety
32
Sources of Variety
  • Recasts

33
Sources of Variety
  • Recasts
  • Communication breakdowns

34
Sources of Variety
  • Recasts
  • Communication breakdowns
  • Uptake and class levels/teacher style

35
The BIG Finding
36
The BIG Finding
  • The trend to continue the topic at all costs,
    even at the expense of noticing feedback
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com