Performance Evaluation System (PES) MCO P1610.7F - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Performance Evaluation System (PES) MCO P1610.7F

Description:

ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS ... LtCol Smidgen. Yes. H. C. C. H. B. H. C. H. C. C. H. C. C. 89.76. Col Spredlode. Suff. Yes. 1. Maj. 0302 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:479
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: portillo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance Evaluation System (PES) MCO P1610.7F


1
Performance Evaluation System (PES) MCO P1610.7F
  • Headquarters Marine Corps
  • Personnel Management Support Branch
  • Performance Evaluation Section (MMSB-30)
  • Quantico, Virginia

2
MASTER BRIEF SHEET
PAGE 1 OF 1
CREATED 12 DEC 2005
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES
FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR
CORRECTIONS)
NAME
GRADE
CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT
BILLET DESCRIPTION
DCTB
SSN
RANK
LCN
DOR
TIG
5yr. 11mo.
MARINE, JOHN S.
O4
US Central Command
J-3 Future Ops Officer
20030717
123456789
MAJ
12345678
19990501
TRAINING SUMMARY
LANGUAGES
MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES
AWARDS
KEY DATE SUMMARY
RIFLE
E/340
19980915
French
1994
PMOS
Infantry Officer
0302
AMOS4
1
MM
DEAF
19890702
PISTOL
M/340
19980915
Spanish
1990
AMOS1
Communications Officer
0602
ACQ
2
NC
TIS
15yr. 11mo.
PFT
A/289
20030922
AMOS2
JOINT
1
NA
PEBD
19890520
MCMAP
TAN
20030815
AMOS3
BMOS
Unrestricted Officer
9910
AFADBD
19890520
EDUCATION SUMMARY
OSCD
19950115
MILITARY
CIVILIAN
PME
ACC COMM
19890520
1993
Winter Mountain Leader
1990
BA, Biology
2002
Command Staff Non-Res
DOR COMM
19890531
1993
Summer Mountain Leader
1986
Associates Deg
1997
AWS Ph II
DOR LDO
1987
Airborne
1982
HS
1995
AWS Ph I
DSG PILOT
1990
Assault Climbers
1994
Warfighting Skills Prog
1990
Infantry Officer (TBS)
DCADB
19890520
1989
Basic School
EAS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY

ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS
From
Billet Description
Per
Eval
Jud
Dec
PME
Co
Ens
Set
Dev
Lea
Ini
Eff
Cou
Pro
Reviewing Officer
RO marks - same grade at processing
Grade
OCC
Months
Reporting Senior
Type
To
Com
Adv
Obser
Concur
RO marks - same grade cumulative
Command
BMOS
RV at Proc
Rs High
RS Avg
RPT Avg
Reports
Promote
Cum RV
RPT at High
Capt
GC
9
Company Commander
C
LtCol Stickler
H
C
B
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
B
B
C
Col Spredlode
0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6
0/7 0/8
19980801
0302
N
94.60
2.82
2.25
2.53
14 of 17
Yes
96.00
Suff
Yes
1
1st Battalion 2d Marines
X
19990503
0/1 1/2 9/3 12/4 23/5 11/6
1/7 0/8
Maj
CH
3
Operations Officer
C
LtCol Smidgen
H
C
C
H
B
H
C
H
C
C
H
C
C
Col Spredlode
19990504
0/1 0/2 1/3 2/4 2/5 2/6
0/7 0/8
0302
C
89.76
3.50
2.93
2.88
Yes
89.76
Suff
Yes
1
1st Battalion 2d Marines
19990801
8 of 8
0/1 0/2 2/3 7/4 7/5 5/6
2/7 0/8
Maj
CH
6
Operations Officer
D
LtCol Highmark
H
E
E
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
C
E
F
Col Fairmark
19990801
0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6
0/7 0/8
0302
C
83.70
6.38
5.95
4.46
11 of 16
Yes
81.89
Suff
No
2
1st Battalion 2d Marines
20000119
1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6
7/7 1/8
Maj
TR
3
BN Executive Officer
B
LtCol Solo
H
B
C
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
Col Fairmark
20000120
0/1 1/2 1/3 3/4 3/5 1/6
0/7 0/8
0302
N
20000414
N/A
2.30
2.30
2.30
1 of 1
Yes
N/A
Suff
Yes
1
1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6
7/7 1/8
1st Battalion 2d Marines
Maj
CH
12
Commanding Officer
F
Col Inflatorio
E
E
D
D
E
E
E
E
F
E
F
F
F
BGen Lowbranch
20000415
1/1 0/2 3/3 3/4 18/5 20/6
12/7 0/8
9910
N
X
93.68
5.57
5.12
5.21
21 of 21
Yes
93.68
Suff
No
1
MCRS Pittsburg
20010507
2/1 0/2 5/3 7/4 24/5 26/6
16/7 1/8
Maj
CH
20010508
14
Commanding Officer
F
Col Eeplus
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
F
E
E
E
E
BGen Toptree
0/1 1/2 0/3 7/4 38/5 17/6
4/7 0/8
9910
N
83.87
5.86
5.33
5.14
5 of 8
Yes
86.44
Suff
Yes
1
MCRS Pittsburg
20020702
0/1 1/2 0/3 9/4 46/5 19/6
5/7 1/8
Maj
TR
12
C
Col Deesmost
D
D
D
D
D
C
D
D
C
D
D
D
D
BGen Panzer
Commanding Officer
20020703
7 of 12
9910
N
X
83.67
5.00
4.42
3.79
Yes
80.00
Insuff
1
MCRS Pittsburg
20030630
3
Administrative Summary
4
Administrative Summary (cont)
5
What is Relative Value?
  • RV is a numerical representation of how a single
    fitness report compares to other reports written
    by the same RS on Marines of the same grade
  • RV TOOL that displays RSs marking philosophy
  • RV should be used within the context of all other
    information on the report
  • RVCommon Language that translates the RSs
    Marking Philosophy (fitrep average ) by grade of
    Marine reported on
  • RV Levels the playing field among RSs reporting
    on Marines of the same grade

6
How does RV Work?
  • RS must process at least three reports on Marines
    of the same grade before RV is displayed on MBS
  • Standard curve scaled from 80 to 100
  • Each of 14 attributes has marking gradients from
    A through H where
  • (A1, B2 G7 H 0)
  • Ave. of observed attributesFitrep Average
  • i.e. a straight B report (28/14) 2.0
  • Fitrep Average plugged into an algebraic formula
    that gives the report a value on a standard curve
  • REMEMBER Approximately Half of all observed
    fitreps (Sgt LtCol) will be less than 90 RV

RS Average 3.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
90
80
100
Hypothetical distribution of 4 reports on a
standard curve
7
Reporting Senior Markings
8
Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
9
Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
10
Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
11
Section K Reviewing Officers Comparative
Assessment
K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS
1. OBSERVATION X Sufficient
Insufficient
2. EVALUATION X Concur Do Not Concur
DESCRIPTION
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT
3. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT Provide a comparative
assessment of potential by placing an "X" in the
appropriate box. In marking the comparison,
consider all Marines of this grade whose
professional abilities are known to you
personally.
0 0 1 2 3 1 0 0
THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE
ONE OF THE FEW EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED MARINES

X
ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS
WHO FORM THE MAJORITY OF THIS GRADE
NUMBERS ELECTRONICALLY OVERLAID AT TIME OF
PROCESSING (OCT 2001) INFORMATION EFFECTIVE AT
TIME PROCESSING AND WILL NOT CHANGE INFORMATIO
N WILL SHOW UP ON OMPF AND DIGITAL BOARDROOM
COPIES OF FITREP
A QUALIFIED MARINE
UNSATISFACTORY
NUMBERS INDICATE TOTAL ASSESSMENTS AND HOW MANY
TIMES RO HAS MARKED MARINES OF SAME GRADE ON THAT
PORTION OF COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT TREE.
12
Reviewing Officer Markings
REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS
RO marks - same grade at processing
Reviewing Officer
Obser
Concur
RO marks - same grade cumulative
Col Spreadlode (Capt GC)
0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5
1/6 0/7 0/8
Suff
Yes
0/1 1/2 9/3 12/4 23/5 11/6
1/7 0/8
Col Spreadlode (Maj AN)
0/1 0/2 1/3 2/4 2/5
2/6 0/7 0/8
Yes
Suff
0/1 0/2 2/3 7/4 7/5
5/6 2/7 0/8
Col Fairmark
0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5
1/6 0/7 0/8
No
Suff
1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 17/5
12/6 7/7 1/8
Col Fairmark
0/1 1/2 1/3 3/4 3/5
1/6 0/7 0/8
Yes
Suff
1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 17/5
12/6 7/7 1/8
13
What do the numbers mean?
  • Relative Value
  • 90 RV is not the magic
  • RV broken down into thirds
  • Upper 93.34 to 100
  • Middle 86.67 to 93.33
  • Lower 80.00 to 86.66
  • Comparative Assessment
  • RO marks in relation to your peers
  • Above how many ranked above you.
  • With how many ranked with you.
  • Below how many ranked below you.
  • It is paramount that the content of the entire
    report be considered, not just the above numbers

14
(No Transcript)
15
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com