Sources of law Case law Doctrine of judicial precedent - stare decisis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sources of law Case law Doctrine of judicial precedent - stare decisis

Description:

Judicial Precedent Richard O Neill University of Hertfordshire Sources of law Do judges make law? ..judges do not make law, but merely, by rules of precedent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1079
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: richardo160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sources of law Case law Doctrine of judicial precedent - stare decisis


1
Judicial Precedent
Richard ONeill University of Hertfordshire
2
Sources of law
  • Do judges make law?
  • ..judges do not make law, but merely, by rules
    of precedent, discover and declare the law that
    has always been there
  • William Blackstone
  • Case law and precedent
  • doctrine of judicial precedent- stare decisis
    et non quieta movere (stare decisis)
  • stand by the decision and do not unsettle the
    established
  • Case law and precedent
  • advantages
  • disadvantages

3
Sources of lawCase law Doctrine of judicial
precedent - stare decisis et non quieta movere
(stare decisis) stand by the decision and do not
unsettle the established courts are bound in
two ways
  • higher and
  • courts
  • bind
  • lower
  • courts
  • like cases are
  • decided alike

4
Hierarchy of the courtscriminal cases civil
cases
5
Hierarchy of the courts
6
Judiciary
Court Judge
House of Lords Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (Law Lords)
Court of Appeal Lord Justices of Appeal
High Court High Court (Puisne) Judges
Crown Court High Court Judges (QBD) Circuit Judges Recorders
County Court Circuit Judges District Judges
Magistrates Court District Judges (Magistrates Court)
  • Roles of a judge
  • to manage case
  • ensure rules of evidence followed
  • decide sentence in criminal cases/award remedy in
    civil cases
  • decides verdict in some cases
  • decide appeals to higher courts
  • Superior Judges

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Hierarchy of the courtsHouse of Lords
  • Law Lords
  • 12 Lords of Appeal in Ordinary
  • Life Peers
  • sit in the Appellate Committee of the House of
    Lords
  • permission required for a case to reach HL
  • Headed by lord Chancellor 5 or 7 Law Lords
  • hear cases (criminal and civil) where a point of
    law is involved (lt 100 per year)
  • decisions binding on all other courts
  • considers matters of law
  • not bound by own decisions - can change a legal
    rule if the point comes before it again
  • (1966 Practice Statement power to depart from
    previous decisions/overrule them when deemed
    right to do so)

11
(No Transcript)
12
Appellate Courts
  • Divisional courts of the High Court - QB
    Chancery Family
  • hear appeals from lower courts
  • 2/3 judges sit to hear appeals
  • QBD hears applications for judicial review
    appeals from Crown Court and Magistrates Court
    applications for habeas corpus
  • Court of Appeal
  • criminal division
  • deals with appeals from Crown Court
  • Lord Justices of Appeal
  • headed by Lord Chief Justice
  • civil division
  • deals with appeals from all three divisions of
    High Court
  • Lord Justices of Appeal
  • headed by Master of the Rolls

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Appeal from Magistrates Court
  • Appeal to Crown Court
  • only available to defence
  • conviction/sentence
  • Appeal to Queens Bench Divisional Court
  • case stated appeals
  • point of law
  • Appeal to House of Lords
  • only if permission (leave) given
  • Only of a point of law of general public interest

19
Appeal from Crown Court
  • Appeal to Court of Appeal
  • defendant
  • conviction/sentence
  • only if permission (leave) given by Court of
    Appeal (typically by single judge)
  • prosecution
  • point of law
  • leniency of sentence
  • Appeal to House of Lords
  • only if permission (leave) given
  • only of a point of law of general public interest

20
Appeal from County Court
  • Set out in Part 52 Civil Procedures Rules
  • Multi-track cases (involving large sums or
    complex points of law) right of appeal to the
    Court Of Appeal
  • necessary to have permission to appeal

21
Appeal from High Court
  • Administration of Justice Act 1969 - cases can
    leap-frog directly to the House of Lords where
    case is
  • subject to an existing binding precedent of CA or
    HL
  • involves a matter of statutory interpretation
  • permission to appeal must be given by House of
    Lords

22
Appeal to European Court of Justice
  • Laws which unaffected by European Law House of
    Lords supreme court
  • Article 234 Treaty of Rome - cases can be
    referred directly to the European Court of
    Justice (ECJ) by any English court if a matter of
    European Law is involved
  • Judges sit in Luxembourg aided by
    Advocates-General to advise on the law
  • ECJ prepared to overrule previous decisions if
    feel it necessary

23
Precedent
Court Courts bound by this court Courts it must follow Whether bound by own decisions
European Court of Justice All other Courts None No
House of Lords All other English courts European Court No (Practice Statement 1966)
Court of Appeal Divisional Courts and all lower courts European Court House of Lords Yes (with some minor exceptions)
Divisional Courts High Court and all lower courts European Court House of Lords Court of Appeal Yes (with some minor exceptions)
High Court County Court and Magistrates Court All higher courts Usually follow each others decisions
Crown Court Magistrates Court - possibly All higher courts Unlikely a decision can create precedent
24
Judicial Precedent
  • Key concepts
  • stare decisis follow
  • ratio decidendi overrule
  • orbiter dictum distinguish
  • binding precedent reverse
  • persuasive precedent dissent
  • judgments disapprove

25
Judicial Precedent
  • Ratio decidendi
  • that part of the decision which is binding is
    termed the ratio decidendi the reason for the
    decision the part of the judgment that creates
    law identified by lawyers looking at the
    judgement later
  • Orbiter dicta
  • things said by the way other parts of the
    judgement that do not create law
  • Binding precedent a precedent that must be
    followed a legal principle made in a superior
    court depend on sufficiently similar facts (on
    all fours with)
  • Persuasive precedent not binding but judge may
    consider and be persuaded to follow

26
Judicial Precedent
  • Binding precedent
  • must be followed
  • Avoiding an awkward precedent
  • distinguishing re-defining a ratio
  • Persuasive precedent
  • courts lower in hierarchy
  • orbiter dicta statements
  • a dissenting judgment
  • decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy
    council
  • decisions from courts in other countries

27
Judicial Precedent
  • Law-making
  • Use of precedent to create law and develop legal
    principles
  • Law of contract
  • rules come from decided cases
  • Tort of negligence
  • major area developed by case law
  • Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
  • nervous shock
  • Criminal law
  • development of areas such as intention
  • new crimes
  • R v R (1991)
  • Medical law
  • Gillick v West Norfolk Wisbech HA (1985)
  • Airedale HA v Bland (1993)
  • Re A (children) (2000)

28
Judicial Precedent
  • Advantages and Disadvantages
  • Advantages Disadvantages
  • certainty rigidity
  • consistency bulk and complexity
  • detail/precision illogical distinctions/over-su
    btlety
  • flexibility and growth slow growth
  • time-saving
  • practicality
  • Important factors
  • legal reasons for past decisions must be known
  • accurate law reporting essential
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com