Title: 7. Molecular Docking and Drug Discovery
1 7. Molecular Docking and Drug Discovery
2(No Transcript)
3The Docking Problem
- Given receptor binding pocket and ligand.
- Task quickly find correct binding pose.
- Two critical modules
- Search Algorithm
- Scoring Function
4Definitions
- pKd measures tightness of binding
- pKi measures ability to inhibit
- Mechanisms of actionfor instance
- Competitive inhibition (most typical docking
case) - Allosteric inhibition (bind to different pocket)
- Allosteric activation
5Challenges
- Search algorithm
- Speed (5M compounds or more)
- Local minima
- High-dimensional search space
- Scoring function
- Strict control of false positives
- Good correlation with pKd
- Multiple terms
- No consensus
- Non-additive effects (solvation, hydrophobic
interactions) - Note pKd does not always correspond with
activity - ADME concerns
6Examples of Docking Search Algorithms
- Genetic Algorithms
- Incremental Construction
- Fragment Reconstruction
- Gradient Descent
- Simulated Annealing and other MC Variants
- Tiered Scoring Functions
- fast screening functions
- slow accurate functions
7High Dimensionality Flexibility
- Most algorithms handle ligand flexibility but do
NOT handle receptor flexibility. - Iterative Docking to find alternate conformations
of the protein - Dock flexible ligand
- Minimize receptor holding ligand rigid
- Repeat
8Scoring Function
- Energy of Interaction (pKd)
- Electrostatics
- Van der Waals interactions
- Hydrogen bonds
- Solvation effects
- Loss of entropy
- Active site waters
9ADME
- ADME concerns can be more important than
bioactivity. Most of these properties are
difficult to predict. - Absorption
- Distribution
- Metabolism
- Excretion
10Docking Programs
- Dock (UCSF)
- Autodock (Scripps)
- Glide (Schrodinger)
- ICM (Molsoft)
- FRED (Open Eye)
- Gold, FlexX, etc.
11Evaluation of Docking Programs
- Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual
screening. J Comput Chem. 2005 Jan
1526(1)11-22. - Evaluation of docking performance comparative
data on docking algorithms. J Med Chem. 2004 Jan
2947(3)558-65. - Impact of scoring functions on enrichment in
docking-based virtual screening an application
study on renin inhibitors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci.
2004 May-Jun44(3)1123-9.
12Cluster Based Computing
- Trivially parallelizable
- Divide ligand input files
- Some programs have specific parallel
implementations (PVM or MPI implementations,) - Commercial licenses are expensive
13Consensus Scoring
- Combining independent scoring functions and
docking algorithms can improve results - Most common method sort using the sum of the
ranks of component scores - More sophisticated methods exist
- Consensus scoring criteria for improving
enrichment in virtual screening. J Chem Inf
Model. 2005 Jul-Aug45(4)1134-46.
14Adding Chemical Informatics
- Docking results can be improved by using chemical
information about the hits. - Chemicals which bind the same protein tend to
have similar structure. - Iterating back and forth between docking and
searching large DB. - Use other filters and predictive modules (e.g.
Lipinski rules) - ALGORITHM
- Dock and rank a chemical database
- Create a bayesian model of the fingerprints of
the top hits. - Re-rank the database based on their likelihood
according to the bayesian model - Finding More Needles in the Haystack A Simple
and Efficient Method for Improving
High-Throughput Docking Results J. Med. Chem.,
47 (11), 2743 -2749, 2004.
15Visualization
- Viewers must be able to scroll through tens or
hundreds of small molecule hits - Accessible viewers designed for this problem
- VIDA from OpenEye (free for academics)
- ViewDock module of Chimera from UCSF (free, open
source)
16Long-term Goal of Drug Discovery
- LTDD (Low Throughput Drug Design) instead of HTVS
(High Throughput Virtual Screening) - Common ground explore virtual space
17Drug DiscoveryCase Study Tuberculosis
18Tuberculosis
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Very thick, waxy cell
wall
19The Cell Wall Key to Pathogen Survival
- Tuberculosis
- 7th cause of death
- 1 in 3 people have TB
- Leading AIDS death cause
- Multi-drug resistant
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
gt30 C fatty acid
10 of genome
Sugar
6 different ACCase b subunits, AccD1-6
Acyl-CoA
Homologs of PccB Focus on AccD4-6
Cell wall lipids Important for pathogen
virulence, survival and latency
20Tuberculosis (TB) An old foe
21 The White Death
John Keats 1795-1821
Frederic Chopin 1810-1849
22 TB still a real threat, because..
Multi-Drug Resistant (Super TB strain)
Its ability to stay alive
23 The Cell Wall Key to Pathogen Survival
gt30 C fatty acid
- Tuberculosis
- 7th cause of death worldwide
- 1 in 3 people have TB
- Leading cause AIDS death
- Multi-drug resistant
- Mycobacterium
- tuberculosis
10 of genome
Sugar
6 different ACCase b subunits, AccD1-6
Acyl-CoA
Homologs of PccB Focus on AccD4-6
Cell wall lipids Important for pathogen
virulence, survival and latency
Substrate specificity for AccD4-6?
24AccD5 Protein Structures
AccD4 (3.3 Å)
Solved AccD5 (2.9 Å)
AccD6 (2.7 Å)
25 Structure of AccD5
26Structure-Based Drug Design
Enzyme assay
Crystals Crystal structure
3. Combinatorial chemistry
1. High throughput screening
TB ACCase, AccD5
Lead compound
2. Virtual Screening
27The Computational/Experimental Loop
Similarity Search
Docking
Assay
28Docking Results
- Diversity set (1990) from NCI
29NCI 65828 (Lead 1)
NCI 172033 (Lead 2)
30Structure-Based Drug Design Identified AccD5
Inhibitors
KI 4.7 mM, KGI 50 mM
? New TB drug lead
T. Lin, M. Melgar, S. J. Swamidass, J. Purdon, T.
Tseng, G. Gago, D. Kurth, P. Baldi, H. Gramajo,
and S. Tsai. PNAS, 103, 9, 3072-3077, (2006). US
Patent pending.
31Acknowledgements
- Pharmacology
- Daniele Piomelli
- Chemistry
- G. Weiss
- J. S. Nowick
- R. Chamberlin
- S. Tsai
- K. Shea
- Informatics
- Liva Ralaivola
- J. Chen
- S. J. Swamidass
- Yimeng Dou
- Peter Phung
- Jocelyne Bruand
- Chloe Azencott
- Alex Ksikes
- Ryan Allison
- Funding
- NIH
- NSF
- Sun
- IGB
32Two Strategies
- Chemical similarity
- Docking
33AccD5
- Enzyme necessary for mycolic acid biosynthesis in
M. tuberculosis.