Watson Strategy, Chap 10 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Watson Strategy, Chap 10

Description:

q1 = 450 q2/2 (Firm 1's best response function) ... In reality, firms select both price and quantity ... Firm that charges higher price sells no bricks (qi = 0) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: erikga
Category:
Tags: chap | strategy | watson

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Watson Strategy, Chap 10


1
Watson Strategy, Chap 10
  • Erik Gartzke
  • Columbia University
  • Department of Political Science
  • W4209 Game Theory and Political Theory
  • Spring 2002 Week 15
  • Web www.columbia.edu/eg589

2
Outline, Watson Chap 10
  • Chap 10 Oligopoly, Tariffs, and Crime and
    Punishment
  • Cournot Duopoly Model
  • Bertrand Duopoly Model
  • Tariff Setting by Two Countries
  • A Model of Crime and Police

3
Chap 10 Oligopoly, Tariffs, and Crime and
Punishment
  • Cournot Duopoly Model
  • 2 Firms produce identical good (red brick)
  • Simultaneously and independently select how many
    bricks to produce (q1 for firm 1, q2 for 2)
  • Price depends on quantity (p 1000 q1 q2)
  • Production cost 100/1000 bricks
  • Firms select quantity S1 0, ?) and S2 0,?)
  • Firms payoff is profit (price x quantity cost)

4
Cournot Duopoly Model
  • Firm 1s payoff is
  • u1(q1,q2) (1000 q1 q2)q1 100q1
  • Firm 2s payoff is
  • u2(q1,q2) (1000 q1 q2)q2 100q2
  • Best response functions for Firms
  • ?u1/?q1 1000 2q1 q2 100
  • Setting this equal to zero and solving for q1, we
    get
  • q1 450 q2/2 (Firm 1s best response
    function)
  • Game is symmetric, so for Firm 2 BR2(q1) 450
    q1/2

5
Cournot Duopoly Model
  • Determine the quantities produced by each Firm
  • BR1(q2) q1 450 (450 q1/2)/2
  • q1 225 q1/4
  • q1 300
  • BR2(q1) q2 450 (450 q2/2)/2
  • q2 225 q2/4
  • q2 300
  • Nash Eq. is inefficient
  • Each firm better off producing at 225 (max
    payoff)
  • Cannot credibly commit to this (PD-type problem)

6
Bertrand Duopoly Model
  • Cournot model has firms selecting quantity
  • In reality, firms select both price and quantity
  • Demand implies definite relationship between p
    and q
  • Think of firms selecting p or q, then market set
    other
  • Makes sense to think of firms selecting quantity
  • Butstrategic differences between p and q
  • Additional insight from model where firms select
    p
  • Two firms simultaneously, independently select p
  • Industry demand p 1000 q1 q2
  • Can be written as Q 1000 p where Q q1 q2

7
Bertrand Duopoly Model
  • Facing p, consumers demand 1000 p 1000 units
    brick
  • Specify the normal form of the game
  • Firm that charges higher price sells no bricks
    (qi 0)
  • Splits quantity if firms offer same price (1000
    p)/2
  • Firm is payoff if pi lt pj
  • ui(p1,p2) (1000 pi)pi 100(1000 pi)
  • (1000 pi)(pi 100)
  • Firm is payoff if pi gt pj is 0
  • Firm is payoff if pi pj
  • ui(p1,p2) (1000 pi)pi /2 100(1000
    pi)/2
  • (1000 pi)(pi 100)/2

8
Bertrand Duopoly Model
  • Neither firm can price below 100 in equilibrium
  • If so, at least one firm earns negative profit
  • Firms can guarantee profit of 0 by pricing at 100
  • pi gt pj ? 100 cannot be the case
  • If pi gt 100, firm j raises profit charging pi ?
    pj gt 100
  • pi pj gt 100 is not an equilibrium
  • Firm i captures all of market by charging 100 ?
    pi lt pj
  • Only possible equilibrium is pi pj 100
  • Price equals marginal cost
  • Equilibrium in Bertrand profit, Cournot profit
    gt 0
  • Price setting markets more competitive than
    quantity setting

9
Tariff Setting by Two Countries
  • Governments influence trade by imposing barriers
    that restrict trade
  • Tariff tax on import of foreign commodities
  • Large states can be better off with small tariff
  • Assuming other states do not raise tariffs
  • Example EU tariff on bananas
  • Tariff creates wedge between international
    price and domestic price for good
  • If wedge is large enough, tariff revenue may be
    larger than welfare loss to own country from
    tariff

10
Tariff Setting by Two Countries
  • States are made worse off by uniformly high
    tariffs
  • States benefit by finding way to enforce free
    trade
  • Game
  • Two countries (1 and 2)
  • xi is tariff level of country i, for i 1,2 0 ?
    xi ? 100
  • Payoffs ui(xi,xj) 2000 60xi xixj xi2
    90xj
  • ?ui /?xi 60 xj 2xi , 60 xj 2xi 0
  • xi 30 xj /2
  • Substituting, xi 30 (30 xi)/2 60

11
A Model of Crime and Police
  • Optimal enforcement levels depend on
  • How much it costs to catch and convict offenders
  • The nature of punishments
  • Response of offenders to changes in enforcement
  • Game
  • Two players criminal (C) and government (G)
  • Gov. selects level of law enforcement x x ? 0
  • Gov. payoff uG xc4 y2/x
  • y2/x is negative effect of crime on society
  • c4 is cost of law enforcement (positive constant)

12
A Model of Crime and Police
  • Criminals payoff uC y1/2/(1 xy)
  • y1/2 is value of criminal activity to criminal
    (if not caught)
  • 1/(1 xy) is the probability that criminal
    evades capture
  • Solution
  • ?uG/?x c4 y2/x2
  • c4 y2/x2 0, c4 y2/x2, x y/c2
  • ?uC/?y (xy1/2)/(1 xy)2 1/(2y1/2(1 xy))
  • (xy1/2)/(1 xy)2 1/(2y1/2(1 xy)) 0
  • (xy1/2)/(1 xy)2 1/(2y1/2(1 xy)), y 1/x
  • Substituting
  • x (1/x)/c2, x 1/c, y c
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com