Attrition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Attrition

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Rick Fleeter Last modified by: fleeter Created Date: 2/27/2002 6:37:37 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: RickFl7
Learn more at: https://www.brown.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Attrition


1
Attrition
Gets used Works Launched Not preempted Tech
Success Stay Committed Committed
Resources Affordable (ROIgt1) Designs Good
Ideas Ideas Not yet Ideas
1s 10s 100s 1000s 10,000s 105
106
2
The Lineup
  • 7 - Radio Comms
  • Radio Concepts
  • Spectrum usage
  • Link margin Orbits
  • Modulation
  • Antennas
  • 8 - Thermal / Mechanical Design. FEA
  • 9 - Reliability
  • 10 - Digital Software
  • 11 - Project Management Cost / Schedule
  • 12 - Getting Designs Done
  • 13 - Design Presentations
  • 1 - Introduction
  • 2 - Propulsion ?V
  • 3 - Attitude Control instruments
  • 4 - Orbits Orbit Determination
  • 5 - Launch Vehicles
  • 6 - Power Mechanisms

3
The New Lineup
  • 7 - Radio Comms
  • Radio Concepts
  • Spectrum usage
  • Link margin Orbits
  • Modulation
  • Antennas
  • 10 - April 4 Thermal / Mechanical
    Design. FEA
  • 8 / 9 - March 14 / 19 Reliability
  • 9 - March 19 Digital Software
  • 11 - Project Management Cost / Schedule
  • 12 - Getting Designs Done
  • 13 - Design Presentations
  • 1 - Introduction
  • 2 - Propulsion ?V
  • 3 - Attitude Control instruments
  • 4 - Orbits Orbit Determination
  • 5 - Launch Vehicles
  • 6 - Power Mechanisms

4
Design Roadmap
Or maybe Here
You Are Here
Define Mission
Concept
Solutions Tradeoffs
ConceptualDesign
Requirements
Analysis
Next week I want you to visit here
Top Level Design
PartsSpecs
Suppliers / Budgets
MaterialsFab
Iterate Subsystems
Final Performance Specs Cost
Detailed Design
5
Last week Power
6
And...Deployables
  • Definitely not moving - for a long (or too long)
    time
  • 1-g vs. 0-g ( vacuum) matters
  • Tolerance v. launch loads
  • Vacuum welds, lubricants, galling
  • Creating friction - rigging
  • Static strength, dynamics, resonance
  • Safety inhibits (its physical)

Galileo didnt x 1
  • Flaws, cracks, delamination, vibration
    loosen/tighten
  • Minute population test experience (the Buick
    antenna)
  • Total autonomy
  • High current actuation
  • Statistics - ways to work v. not

Freja did x 8
7
Due tonight
  • Technical requirementsCreate a list of
    technical requirements - even if it has TBDs in
    it. ( revisit mission rqts)
  • Preparation Radios Comms
  • SMAD Chapter 13
  • TLOM Chapters 7,8,9
  • Tools selection
  • Finite element
  • Design and layout
  • Presentation Graphics
  • Systems designcreate a good looking cartoon
    set of the spacecraft, orbit and ground segments
  • Pick Something Physical

8
The plan for March 14(eve of ides)
  • Part 1 (homework) Radio Strategy - what why
    why not the other options Spacecraft Tx
    Power, modulation, antenna selection, l same
    for Ground Station Up and down link calcs
  • Part 2 (class) System Design review /
    discussion1 hour start on reliability 20
    minute presentation x 3 groups 1 hour 2
    reviewers (plus me) from AeroAstro - review, but
    mainly help with designs and answer your
    questions

9
Electromagnetic Spectrum Map
100 GHz 10 GHz 1 Ghz 100 MHz 10 MHz 1
MHz 100 KHz 10 KHz 1 KHz 100 Hz 10 Hz
- SHF and some radars 15 - 50 GHz - UHF /
L-band Television, spacecraft, cordless
cellular 500 MHz to 1 GHz - Short Wave radio
International broadcast, amateur HF, worldwide
non-satellite comms 1.6 Mhz to 50
MHz Telephone / RTTY baseband 2400 - 9600
HzPower transmission 60 Hz
1 cm 1 m 100m 10 km 1000 km (l)
- Microwave Terrestrial satellite, µwave ovens,
Radio Astronomy1 GHz - 15 GHz - VHF FM radio,
Taxi, Air Traffic, Air Nav, VHF Amateur radio,
Little LEOS50 MHz to 500 MHz - AM Radio,
medium and long wave 180 KHz to 1.6 MHzVLF
Comms (eg submarines)100 - 5000 Hz
10
Some Radio Facts (?)
  • 100 KHz is the low end of the useful radio band
  • 100 MHz is low end of useful satellite lt --- gt
    earth links
  • Light and heat are alternatives to radio -and
    no license required
  • Radio is barely possible 0.5 W _at_ 2000 km yields
    4 x 10-14 W/m2
  • Propagation goes as 1/r2
  • Since EIR, for a 50W antenna, that signal is a
    µV varying at gt 109/second
  • Bandwidth and data rate are proportional -
    mostly Shannons Law R(max) Blog2( 1 C
    / N )

11
Spectrum Trades
Spectrum Region Pros Cons Below 100
MHz ( ) Ionosphere
blocks HF / VHF  Limited bandwidth l gt 3m
Big antennas 100 - 500 MHz Best
link with omnis Antennas are large VHF / UHF
Low cost RF components  Hard to provide
gain 3m gt l gt 60 cm Highest h
(80)  Limited bw (kbit/s) 1 - 2.5
GHz  Commercial gear plentiful  Crowded! L
S Bands  Good bw (Mbit/s)  Usually
requires 30 cm gt l gt 12 cm Good Tx h (60)
gain antennas  Small, low cost
antennas 8 - 10 GHz Small, high gain
antennas  Higher cost X - band  Less
Crowded Lower h (lt50) l - 3 cm  High bw
(many Mbit/s)   Some Wx sensitivity 25
GHz  Huge bw (Gbit/s)  Wx
sensitive SHF  Very high gain antennas
Slant angle limited l - 1.5 cm  Easiest
license to obtain  High Cost  Low h
(lt30)
12
Data Rates
  • Whats in a baud?
  • 1 to 100 basic pager
  • 100 to 1k messaging pager
  • 1k to 10k fax, email, voice
  • 10k to 100k web surfing, picture phone, digital
    radio
  • 100k to 1M Digital LDTV
  • 1M to 10M Digital HDTV
  • 10M to 1B Data, multiplexing and multi channel
    of above
  • Spacecraft data rates
  • Amsat 10k
  • Advanced micros 1M
  • Small Sats (Iridium) 10M -
    100M
  • Big satellites gigabits per second

13
Modulation
  • AM not inherently digital, low efficiency
  • FM Easy lock where power is not critical
    (uplinks)
  • BPSK QPSK Inherently Digital and efficient
  • Spread Spectrum Low efficiency, bulletproof

Phase Shift
Interpretation
0
0 , 0
90
0, 1
180
1, 1
270
1, 0
360
0, 0
(Same as 0)
  • Ranging
  • Round trip time measurement
  • good to bit rate i.e. 106 gt 100 m
  • Doppler Typically 500m to 10 km
  • Note Repeated measures of range and time
    allows orbit solution
  • To Avoid
  • Multiple Modulation Schemes
  • subcarriers etc. (not info dense)

14
Attrition II
Field degradation Worst case link Eb / No (error
spec) Demodulation Demod, Noise(Tr, a, sky) BW
No Receive Aperture Absorb, polarize 4pr2 ( - Gt
) Line / feed lossesBit rate Eb Transmitter
nWatts
100 102 104 106 108
1010 1012
15
Notes on Links and Link Margins
The Link Equation objective Eb / Nb large
enough to detect the signal within a specific
level of uncertainty (error rate) Eb / Nb
Power x Lossl x Gaint x Ls x La x Gr
k x T x R where Lossl line loss
k Boltzmanns const. Gaint transmit
antenna gain T Temp (K) Ls space
loss (spreading) R Data Rate La
path attenuation Gr receive antenna
gain But... Gr is not real - it is
defined as the ratio of real aperture to
aperture of an isotropic antenna, l2/4p So
really it is a measure of area ratio, not gain.
Rx Antenna as noise reducer. Question Why is
R in the denominator (the No part?)
16
(more) Notes on Links and Link Margins
How much margin do you need? - whats the
actual local horizon? - whats the penalty for
losing lock sometimes?  Local obstructions are
a factor - especially when snow covered
Variable data rate  Some tradeoffs - sun vs.
earth pointing - sun tracking PV array vs. earth
tracking antenna - data rate vs. contact
duration ( of GSs) - GS vs. satellite gain -
compression (CPU cost) vs. downlink rate  Its
amazing the link works at all...
17
Orbit Implications for Comms
  • LEO has 1600x easier link
  • 3x (10dB) smaller antenna (50x lighter)
  • 10x lower power
  • 3x (10dB) smaller GS antenna
  • But
  • Need 10x more satellites, 5x more launches
  • Reconstitution hassles
  • Global Coverage! (whether you want it or not)
  • Constellation Management
  • Cross Linking, switching, handoffs

18
The costs of bit rate, small user terminals and
large coverage area
Availability
- Global Mobile - Many Locations - Fixed
Location
  • Power a baud (bit rate)
  • Power a (1/antenna dia)2
  • Power a Service Area
  • Power a obstacles (windows, roofs)
  • Service Area a orbit altitude
  • Mass a (Antenna dia)3

- Video - CD radio - Telephone - Paging
Laptop- Cell Phone - Wristwatch -
Bandwidth
Portability
Spacecraft Cost
19
Ground
Elements
Station
20
Antenna Strategies
  • Omni (Sputnik)- 0 dB gain (or less)- Requires
    gt1 antenna- Interference fringes- Downlink
    power?
  • Sector (HETE) 3 - 6 dB gain (or less)
    Requires gt1 antenna Active Control but no ACS
    impact

Directional (Pioneer)- huge gain 24 dB typ.
- requires gt1 just in case- Major ACS impact-
Steerable?
21
Link design
  • Start with Spacecraft
  • Whats the critical link
  • Up or down?
  • What data rate required
  • Frequency considerations
  • GS limitations (power, gain)
  • Eventually, pin down all but one or two variables
    e.g.
  • Space antenna gain
  • Modulation method
  • Then do a trial link and iterate
  • Note All user links need lots of margin - 10 dB
    good, 20 dB better
  • Some tricks
  • How reliable does the link need to be? What
    error rate?
  • Coding requires only computation
  • How close to the horizon can your GS see?
  • Is one link critical, the other not?
  • Differentiate master GS from user terminals
  • Burst mode power can be higher - use batteries
  • Scanning a high-gain antenna
  • Spread spectrum - hurts link but helps sharing
    and security (whats in rqts?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com