Title: Lexicon Organization: How are words stored
1Lexicon Organization How are words stored?
- Atomist view
- Words are stored in their full inflected form
- talk gt talk
- talked gt talked
- toothbrush gt toothbrush
- Decompositional view
- Words are generated of morphemes that are stored
in the lexicon - talk gt talk
- talked gt talk -ed
- toothbrush gt tooth brush
- But
- Big memory load
- Novel forms
- Lack of relatednesstalk vs talked talk vs
mince
- But
- Irregular formstaught gt teach -ed ?
- Meaning of opaque compoundsquarterback gt
quarter back ? Vacation ltgt vacate-tion(many
false alarms)
2Longtin et al 2003
- -ette in French
- gaufrette little waffle - GAUFRE waffle
- baguette bread - BAGUE ring
- abricot apricot - ABRI shelter
- Different types of morphological relations
between the target and the prime - Experiment 1 masked visual-visual priming
- Experiment 2 Cross-modal priming task Lexical
decision to the target
3Longtin et al 2003
Experiment 2 cross-modal priming sensitive to
morphological semantic (but not
pseudo-morphological or orthographic) overlap
between the prime and the target
facilitation
4Longtin et al 2003
Experiment 1 masked priming - 46 ms prime
target decision There is no time to access
anything but the form of the prime (i.e. the
semantics of the prime is not accessed)
facilitation
inhibition
5- Taft and Forster (1975)
- Prelexical Affix Stripping Hypothesis Words are
decomposed into their morphological constituents
even in the absence of semantic transparency
6Swinney (1979)
- Lexical Access during Sentence Comprehension
(Re)Consideration of Context Effects - How are homonym words activated/accessed from the
mental lexicon?
7Homonyms
- Homonyms - words that have the same pronunciation
spelling but differ in meaning - RING
- RING1 (noun) a typically circular band of metal
for wearing on the finger as an ornament - RING2 (verb) to give forth a clear resonant
sound, as a bell when struck
8Homonyms
Conceptual Level
Lemma Level
N,
V,
???
Phonological Level
???
9Homonyms
Conceptual Level
Lemma Level
N,
V,
Phonological Level
???
10Experiment 1 Stimuli
11Experiment 1 Results
0
12Experiment 2 Replication of Exp.1
0
13Interpretation of the results, Exp 1.
- The results of Experiment 1 provide fairly
strong support for a model of sentential
processing in which lexical access is an
autonomous process because semantic facilitation
was observed for lexical decisions to words
related to both the contextually relevant and the
contextually inappropriate meaning of the
ambiguity, even in the presence of the very
strong prior semantic contexts, it appears
reasonable to conclude that semantic context does
not direct lexical access. Rather, immediately
following occurrence of an ambiguous word all
meanings for that word seem to be momentarily
accessed during sentence comprehension.
14- What happens after one of the meanings of an
ambiguous word is selected?
15Experiment 2 a later position
- A single change from Experiment 1 the visual
(lexical decision) materials appeared three
syllables following the ambiguous (or control)
word during the course of the sentence.