Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

Description:

Nancy Fuhrman. Debbie Gaffney-Dilley. Donna Hart-Tervalon. Anita ... Brent Odell. Patricia Williams. Expanded Workgroup. Tim Boals. Tom Grogan. Jill Haglund ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: maryjo5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction


1
Addressing Disproportionality in Special
EducationA Wisconsin Perspective
  • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

2
Overview
  • Wisconsins Annual Performance Report on
    Disproportionality in Special Education
  • Wisconsins Action Plan for Addressing
    Disproportionality

3
What is Disproportionality?
  • Disproportionate representation is defined as
  • the extent to which membership in a given group
    affects the probability of being placed in a
    specific education disability category.
  • Oswald, et al 1999

4
Wisconsins Demographic Profile
5
Statewide Data EBD
6
Statewide Data Cognitive Disability
7
Statewide Data OHI
8
Statewide Data Educational Environment
9
Section II
Wisconsins Action Plan For
Addressing Disproportionality
10
Workgroup Members
  • Deborah Bilzing
  • Janice Duff
  • Nancy Fuhrman
  • Debbie Gaffney-Dilley
  • Donna Hart-Tervalon
  • Anita Heisig
  • John Humphries
  • Courtney Reed Jenkins
  • Jack Marker
  • Brent Odell
  • Patricia Williams

11
Expanded Workgroup
  • Tim Boals
  • Tom Grogan
  • Jill Haglund
  • Laverne Jackson Harvey
  • Mary Kleusch
  • JP Leary
  • Mary Maronek
  • Jean Whitcomb

12
Advisory Board Representatives
  • CIFMS Stakeholders
  • Great Lakes Inter-tribal Council
  • State Superintendents Council on Special
    Education
  • Wisconsin Family Assistance Center for Education,
    Training Support, Inc. (WI FACETS)
  • Wisconsin Special Education Stakeholders
  • OthersTo be Determined

13
Workgroup Goals
  • Improve the quality of education statewide for
    all students, including students with
    disabilities, students of color and students
    living in poverty
  • Increase our internal capacity to address
    statewide concerns relative to the
    disproportionate number of students of color
    referred and placed in special education
  • Address disproportionality as an educational
    issue, not just as a special education issue

14
Workgroup Activities Needs Assessment 02-03
  • Develop a network of local, state, and national
    consultants with expertise and experience in
    facilitating statewide initiatives to address
    disproportionality.
  • Identify and promote research-based strategies
    that reduce referral rates and improve outcomes
    for all students, particularly students of color
    and students living in poverty.
  • Identify, support and develop partnerships with
    LEAs and CESAs who have developed materials,
    resources and training modules to address the
    issue of disproportionality.

15
Workgroup Activities 03-04
  • Developed an action plan
  • Developed and piloted a Disproportionality
    Focused Monitoring Model
  • Contracted with the University of
    WisconsinMadison to review and summarize
    research
  • Employed a summer intern to develop a resource
    library (Markeda Newell)

16
Workgroup Activities 04-05
  • Attended conferences, workshops, and
    teleconferences related to addressing
    disproportionality
  • Established formal partnership with NCSEAM
  • Established formal partnership with NCCRESt
  • Contracted with Daniel Losen, Legal and Policy
    Senior Associate, Harvard Civil Rights Project
  • Developed a relationship with NCRRC (North
    Central Regional Resource Center)

17
Workgroup Activities 05-06
  • Revised action plan
  • Expanded workgroup
  • Employed an intern
  • Developed a Summer Institute Addressing
    Disproportionality
  • Establishing a website
  • Receiving training on disproportionality data
    analysis
  • Reviewing and analyzing state and district
    policies and practices
  • Developing procedures for identifying significant
    disproportionality based on race and ethnicity as
    required in IDEA 2004.

18
Significant Challenges in Addressing
Disproportionality
  • Understanding and addressing the new provisions
    in IDEA 2004
  • Refining criteria for determining significant
    disproportionality
  • Identifying rigorous, measurable targets
  • Continuing development of a monitoring process
  • Developing a process and technical assistance
    plan for interpreting district-level
    disproportionality data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com