Biological Cycle of the Beef Cow - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Biological Cycle of the Beef Cow

Description:

Therefore the biological cycle has everything to do with ... Silage. Cakes & grain. Total. February. 870. 465. 160. 1495. April. 970. 100. 160. 1230. June. 460 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: carl47
Category:
Tags: beef | biological | cow | cycle | silage

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biological Cycle of the Beef Cow


1
(No Transcript)
2
(No Transcript)
3
Biological Cycle of the Beef Cow
  • The biological cycle of the cow has implication
    on reproduction, nutrition, and genetics
  • Therefore the biological cycle has everything to
    do with the economic forces of beef production
  • To optimize production efficiency we must
    understand the requirements of the cow throughout
    the cycle
  • nutritional requirements of the beef cow
    fluctuate from very low (lower than any other
    livestock) to moderately high

4
Gestation length is approximately 282 days
  • 1st trimester 94 days
  • 2nd trimester 94 days
  • 3rd trimester 94 days
  • 365 days/yr - 282
  • 83 days to get her rebred

5
Biological Cycle of the Beef Cow
Born Day (-430)
Bred, June 1 Day 1
120 d bred lactation High mid
83 d Early lactation Very high!
Post-partum Interval 83 days
1st Trimester 94 days
3rd Trimester 94 days
2nd Trimester 94 days
100 d Mid gest Very low
6
Annual energy requirement and hay intake 1200
lb cow, 20 lb milk at peak
7
Annual protein requirement and hay intake 1200
lb cow, 20 lb milk at peak
8
Goal of Managing the Biological Cycle of the Beef
Cow
  • Plan the calving season so that the time of
    greatest animal need will coincide with time of
    greatest nutrient supply.
  • Two factors
  • Range readiness
  • Biological cycle of the beef cow

9
The economic return of a grazing program depends
on forage quantity, quality, and harvest
efficiency Goal is match the seasonality of
grasses with the season of livestock use
10
Seasonal quality and quantity of grazable forage
11
MSU Cow Nutrition Symposium
12
WHY CHANGE?
Matching the forage resources
Altered marketing strategies
Competing enterprises
13
Mixed grass prairie dominated by cool-season
grasses
150-d mid-April to mid-September growing season,
338 mm average
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
40.0
37.2
35.6
18
273
229
181
19
224
222
203
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Approximate Feed Inputskg/cow/year
23
Conclusions
  • Time of calving and age at weaning affected
    weaning weights of calves
  • Must consider all goals in choosing calving and
    weaning times
  • Feed costs must be weighed against calf prices
    and herd size to determine optimum calving time

24
Matching forage and cows requirement, Deseret
Land and Livestock, From 1995 Intermountain Cow
Symposium
  • Reduce dependency on harvested forages - lower
    annual feed cost
  • Harvest hay on only productive land ? lowered
    /ton of hay
  • Decreased annual labor cost of feeding cows

25
Hay production changes at the ranch
26
Selected costs per cow per year
27
Conclusion
  • Postponing the calving season to approximately
  • 40 days before maximum forage growth
  • can be beneficial.
  • Reduced cost in feeding
  • Better utilization of range forage
  • Increase in reproductive performance
  • Cleaner environment
  • Better weather condition
  • Higher price for weaned calves
  • Why do many ranchers calve in February?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com