Neutrino Physics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Neutrino Physics

Description:

Atmospheric are converted to (SK) (98) Solar e are converted to either ... Subdominant m2. Decoupled m1. Diagonal RH nu basis. 9/20/09. Steve King,Glasgow. 38 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: deptp164
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neutrino Physics


1
Neutrino Physics
  • Oscillation (SK 1998 - MINOS 2006)
  • Revolution (New parameters)
  • Challenges and Tools (LBL)
  • Implication (Particle Physics and Cosmology)

2
  • Oscillation
  • Neutrino physics has surprised us all
  • Many discoveries in the last 10 years
  • Atmospheric ?? are converted to ?? (SK) (98)
  • Solar ?e are converted to either ?? or ??(SNO)
    (02)
  • Only the LMA solution left for solar neutrinos
    (HomestakeGalliumSKSNO) (02)
  • Reactor anti-?e disappear/reappear (KamLAND) (04)
  • Accelerator ?? disappear (K2K 04 , MINOS 06)
  • MiniBoone fails to confirm LSND (07)

3
(No Transcript)
4
MiniBoone does not support the LSND result and
instead supports the three neutrino paradigm
5
Neutrino oscillations quantum mechanics over
macroscopic distances
  • Need coherent source
  • Need interference (i.e., large mixing angles)
  • Need long baseline

All provided by Nature
6
MINOS Experiment
Chris Smith
  • Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search
  • High power nm beam produced by 120 GeV protons
    from the Main Injector at FNAL
  • Two functionally identical detectors
  • Near detector (ND) at Fermilab to measure the
    beam composition and energy spectrum
  • Far detector (FD), 735km away, in the Soudan
    Mine, Minnesota to search for evidence of
    oscillations

735 km
7
MINOS shifts up ? m232 a bit
8
Latest global fit for atmospheric solar
oscillations
  • Latest version Oct 07
  • Latest SSM
  • SNO salt data
  • K2K
  • Latest MINOS results

9
  • Revolution
  • Lepton Flavor is not conserved
  • Neutrinos have tiny masses, not very hierarchical
  • Neutrinos mix a lot
  • At least 7 new parameters for SM
  • Quite unlike quark mass and mixing
  • Of all fermions, neutrinos are least understood
  • Tiny neutrino mass may indicate new physics

10
7 New Parameters for SM!
3 masses 3 angles 1 phase 7 new parameters
for SM
11
  • Neutrino mass squared splittings and angles

3 ? errors
Valle et al
Normal
Inverted
Absolute neutrino mass scale?
12
Tri-bimaximal mixing (TBM)
Harrison, Perkins, Scott
c.f. data
  • Current data is consistent with TBM
  • But no convincing reason for exact TBM expect
    deviations

13
Useful to Parametrize lepton mixing matrix in
terms of deviations from tri-bimaximal mixing
SFK arXiv0710.0530 
r reactor
s solar
a atmospheric
Present data is consistent with r,s,a0
?tri-bimaximal
14
c.f. Wolfenstein for quarks
Quark UT is very well determined
15
In the case of leptons UT is unknown
Neither r nor ? is measured UT could be a
straight line!
16
  • The Challenges
  • Measure the neutrino masses (m1, m2, m3 scale,
    ordering, nature)
  • Measure the neutrino mixings (the
    deviations from tri-bimaximal mixing r,s,a and
    the CP phase ?)

17
  • The Tools
  • Present experiments
  • SuperK, KamLAND, Mini-BooNE, MINOS, Cuoricino,
    NEMO
  • Forthcoming experiments
  • CNGS, Double-Chooz Reactor, T2K, NO?A, KATRIN,
    0??? expts
  • Possible future long baseline (LBL) experiments
  • Superbeam upgrades, Beta beam or Neutrino Factory

18
E.Falk
Daya Bay
19
Oscillation formulae in terms of r,s,a
Only sensitive to the reactor parameter r
Reactor
L B L
Sensitive to r,s,a
20
Oscillation formulae in terms of r,s,a (including
matter effects)
LBL
Sensitive to r, ?
For a list of formulae in terms of r,s,a see SFK
arXiv0710.0530 
21
Future LBL Options
  • Second generation super-beam CERN, FNAL, BNL,
    J-PARC II
  • Neutrino Factory
  • Beta-beam

Which one(s) to go for? ? ISS
22
Prospects to measure ?13
23
Prospects to measure CP Violation
ISS Scoping Study 06
Note choice of facility will depend on ?13
24
Prospects to measure a s232- 0.5
S. Antusch, M. Huber, J. Kersten, T. Schwetz,
W. Winter
25
Present 2 ? error
Prospects to measure the deviation of ?12 from
35o
SPMINreactor experiment at the first Survival
Probability Minimum
26
  • Implications for physics and cosmology

Particle Physics
  • Origin of tiny neutrino mass
  • Extra dimensions, See-saw mechanism, SUSY
  • Unification of matter, forces and flavour
  • GUTs, Family Symmetry, Strings,
  • Did neutrinos play a role in our existence?
  • Leptogenesis
  • Did neutrinos play a role in forming galaxies?
  • Hot/Warm Dark matter component
  • Did neutrinos play a role in birth of the
    universe?
  • Sneutrino inflation
  • Can neutrinos shed light on dark energy? ? m?4

Cosmology
27
  • Neutrino mass is zero in the Standard Model for
    three reasons
  • There are no right-handed neutrinos
  • There are only Higgs doublets of SU(2)L
  • There are only renormalizable terms

In the Standard Model these conditions all apply
so neutrinos are massless, with ?e , ?? , ??
distinguished by separate lepton numbers Le, L?,
L? Neutrinos and anti-neutrinos are distinguished
by the total conserved lepton number LLeL?L?
To generate neutrino mass we must relax 1 and/or
2 and/or 3
28
Recall that a mass term can be thought of as an
interaction between left and right-handed chiral
fields
Left-handed neutrinos ?L can form masses with
either right-handed neutrinos ?R or with their
own CP conjugates ?cL
29
Right-handed neutrinos ?R can also form masses
with their own CP conjugates ?Rc
Majorana
In principle there is nothing to prevent the
right-handed Majorana mass MRR from being
arbitrarily large since ?R is a gauge singlet
e.g. MRRMGUT On the other hand it is possible
that MRR 0 which could be enforced by lepton
number L conservation
30
  • Summary of Dirac vs. Majorana Mass

31
  • Dirac Neutrinos

Recall origin of electron mass in SM with
Yukawa coupling ?e must be small since ltH0gt175
GeV
Introduce right-handed neutrino ?eR with zero
Majorana mass
then Yukawa coupling generates a Dirac neutrino
mass
32
  • Q. Why are Dirac Yukawas so small? A.

Extra dimensions
An entomological analogy
Typical string/D-brane set-up involves extra
dimensions
bulk
brane
33
  • Flat extra dimensions with RH neutrinos in the
    bulk

Number of extra dimensions
e.g. for one extra dimension y the ?R
wavefunction spreads out over the extra
dimension, leading to a volume suppressed Yukawa
coupling at y0
?R in bulk
34
  • Warped extra dimensions with SM in the bulk

Overlap wavefunction of fermions with Higgs gives
exponentially suppressed Dirac masses, depending
on the fermion profiles
Planck brane
TeV brane
35
  • Majorana Neutrinos

Renormalisable ?L 2 operator
where ? is light Higgs triplet with VEV lt 8GeV
from ? parameter
Non-renormalisable ?L 2 operator
Weinberg
This is nice because it gives naturally small
Majorana neutrino masses mLL ltH0gt2/M where M is
some high energy scale The high mass scale can be
associated with some heavy particle of mass M
being exchanged (can be singlet or triplet)
e.g. see-saw mechanism at tree-level or singlet
Higgs exchange at one or two loops
36
The See-Saw Mechanism
P.Minkowski, PLB67(1977)421
A very natural and appealing mechanism!
Neutrinos are so light because RH neutrino get
heavy Majorana masses (L number violated at HE)
Neutrinos are a probe of
physics at high energy scales up to MGUT!
37
Sequential Dominance
SFK 98- (Basis Invariant 06)
38
This implies a non-Abelian family symmetry
Need
with
2 3 symmetry (from maximal atmospheric
mixing) 1 2 3 symmetry (from tri-maximal solar
mixing)
Examples of suitable non-Abelian Family
Symmetries
SFK, Ross Velasco-Sevilla Varzelias
Discrete subgroups preferred by vacuum alignment
SFK, Malinsky
39
Are neutrinos telling us something about
unification of matter, forces and flavour?
t
u
d
c
e
s
b
Family symmetry e.g. SU(3)
GUT symmetry e.g. SO(10)
40
To build a model, must decide
Backup slides
41
Survey of predictions for ?13 Albright and Chen
Large
Low
42
Bjorken,Pakvasa,SFK
GUT Theory Prediction for ?13
.
.
.

.
Tri-bimaximal form for m?
. . .


GUT prediction for ?13
43
SFK, Antusch,Masina
Sum Rule Prediction for ?12
Assume exact tri-bimaximal mixing in the neutrino
sector with Cabibbo-like charged lepton
corrections (motivated by GUTs) ? Sum rule
In the TBM parametrization recast as
CP phase
Solar
Reactor
Wolfenstein
Reactor
44
Sum rule
Bands show 3 ? error for an optimized neutrino
factory determination of ?13cos ?
.
Current 3?
.
Antusch, Huber, SFK, Schwetz
45
Prospects to measure sum rule combination ?13 cos
?
3? error in degrees on ?13cos ?
Antusch, Huber, SFK, Schwetz
46
  • Cosmology

WMAP 5 Year
47
Temperature Maps
Earth
Universe
48
  • WMAP 5 shows that neutrinos must play an
    essential role in the Universe since n?n? gtgtne

Third peak provides evidence for the neutrino
cosmic background at 95 C.L.
49
The Universe according to WMAP
Now
Then
50

Did neutrinos play a role in forming galaxies?
Tegmark
Lesgourgues
CMB power spectrum
Galaxy power spectrum
Klapdor- signal 0.2 eV
51
  • Absolute ? mass scale and the nature of ? mass

Majorana (no signal if Dirac)
Neutrinoless double beta decay
Klapdor- 76 Ge 0.4 eV
(signal) Majorana 76 Ge 0.05
eV GERDA 76 Ge 0.1 eV (phase
II) 0.01
eV (phase III ) Non- 76 Ge CUORE, NEMO3
SuperNEMO ?50meV0.05 eV COBRA Cd116
??? EXO Xe136 1 ton 5y 50-70meV0.05-0.07eV SNO
Nd150 start 2011? ?50meV0.05 eV The
Future I 100-500meV SNemo CUORE GERDA EXO
SNO II 15-50meV 1 ton 10y? III 2-5meV 100 tons
20y??
Tritium beta decay
Present Mainz lt 2.2 eV KATRIN 0.35eV
52
Cosmology vs Neutrinoless DBD
Approx. degeneracy is TESTABLE
Inverted hierarchy is TESTABLE
cosmo
Normal hierarchy is NOT TESTABLE
from F. Feruglio, A. Strumia, F. Vissani ('02)
53
Leptogenesis
Boris Kayser
54

Basic Idea of Leptogenesis
Fukugita,Yanagida
  • Right-handed neutrinos are produced in early
    universe and decay out of equilibrium giving net
    lepton numbers Le , L? , L?
  • CP violation from complex Yukawa couplings
  • Out of equilibrium Boltzmann eqs lead to Le , L?
    , L? partial washouts
  • Surviving Le, L? , L? are processed into B via
    B-L conserving sphalerons

55
Allowed regions of TRH and MR1 in MSSM
Assumes maximal asymmetry and optimal washout
Antusch,Teixeira
Gravitino problem if TRHgt106 GeV
56
Motivation to go beyond MSSM
  • Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
  • - Solves ? problem of MSSM
  • Solves fine tuning problem of MSSM
  • Predicts Z, exotic D quarks, exotic L leptons
    at LHC
  • Solves gravitino problem in leptogenesis (in
    progress)

Extra diagrams contribute to leptogenesis
SFK,Luo,Miller,Nevzorov
57
Typical Spectrum
Athron,SFK,Miller,Moretti,Nevzorov
non-Higgs
58
The Origin of the Universe
  • Right-handed scalar neutrino as inflaton Vm2?
    giving r0.16, ns0.96 (Murayama,Suzuki,Yanagida,Y
    okoyama)
  • Or sneutrino hybrid inflation r0, ns 0.9-1.0
    (Antusch, Bastero-Gil, SFK, Shafi)

Rachel Bean et al
59
Conclusion
  • 1998-2008 is the golden age of neutrino
    oscillations neutrino mass and mixing (beyond
    SM)
  • Goal of next generation of oscillation
    experiments is to show that the deviations from
    TBM r,s,a are non-zero
  • Challenge for future is to accurately measure
    r,s,a and ? to relate them to each other and to
    the Wolfenstein ?
  • High precision experiments will be required
    (reactor, LBL, neutrinoless DBD)
  • Challenge for particle theory is to understand
    the origin of the small neutrino mass and the
    large mixing
  • Implications for GUTs and Flavour Models leading
    to testable predictions e.g. sum rule
  • Implications for origin of matter and the Universe
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com