PROJECT SCHEDULING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

PROJECT SCHEDULING

Description:

2D drawings and network diagrams do not support timely decisions ... Field mishap alteration to pile driving sequence. Bar chart of pile driving operation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:780
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: gsa63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PROJECT SCHEDULING


1
PROJECT SCHEDULING
CHAPTER - 7
Example of a 4D Model
2
4D MODELING
  • The Need
  • 2D drawings and network diagrams do not support
    timely decisions
  • Design Construction schedules are too abstract
    to visualize and understand
  • 4D technologies are being used to analyze
    visualize
  • 4D support computer based analysis of schedule

3
THE TECHNOLOGY
  • 4D models are very time consuming to generate
    manually
  • The difficulty and cost of creating such models
    are currently blocking their widespread adoption.

4
INTRODUCTION
  • The concept of project scheduling addresses the
    issue of time planning and management
  • Simple bar charting concepts as well as network
    scheduling concepts will be introduced in this
    chapter

5
BAR CHARTS
  • The basic modeling concept of the bar chart is
    the representation of a project work item or
    activity as a time scale bar whose length
    represents the planned duration of the activity
  • The length of the bar has two different meanings
  • The physical length of the bar represents the
    planned duration of the work item
  • It also provides a proportionally scaled baseline
    on which to plot at successive intervals of time,
    the correct percentage complete
  • The connected diagram of bars is celled as
    bar-net

6
Figure 7-1 Bar Chart Model
  • Plan Focus
  • Work Focus

7
Figure 7-2 Bar Chart Project Models
  • Bar Chart Schedule (Plan Focus)
  • Bar Chart Updating (Control Focus)

8
Figure 7-3 Preliminary Bar-Net Schedule for the
Small Gas Staion
9
SCHEDULING LOGIC
  • To develop a schedule, the logical sequence, or
    schedule logic
  • To understand the role played by sequencing in
    developing a schedule, see fig. 7-4(a), fig.
    7-4(b),Fig. 7-5
  • Each element is represented by a labeled circle
    (or node)
  • For describing adjacency, relational contact is
    necessary
  • Nodes of fig. 7-5 can be joined by a series of
    lined. If the idea of contact is expanded to
    indicate the order, a directed line may be used,
    fig. 7-6b or fig. 7-7
  • An example of pier pile driving operation is
    shown in fig.7-8(a), 7-8(b), 7-8(c), 7-8(d)
  • In order to schedule a project, the sequence of
    activities and their relationship to one another
    must be defined

10
Figure 7-4 Simple Schematic Models
  • Schematic view of pier
  • Exploded view of pier

11
Figure 7-5 Model of Pier Components
  • Figure 7-6 Logical Modeling Rationales
  • Adjacency of contract modeling
  • Physical structure order modeling
  • Physical construction order modeling

Figure 7-7 Conceptual Model of Pier component
Relationships
12
Figure 7-8 Construction Sequence and Activity
Modeling
  • Alternate row pile driving
  • Sequential roe pile driving
  • Field mishap alteration to pile driving sequence
  • Bar chart of pile driving operation

13
SCHEDULING NETWORKS
  • Scheduling networks consist of nodes and links
  • Nodes represent events fig. 7-9(a) fig. 7-9(b)
  • Directional link which begins on node I and ends
    on node J
  • Length of the link implies duration similar to a
    bar in bar chart
  • Networks of activities using nodes and
    directional links
  • Fig. 7-10(b), introduction of a dummy activity
  • Activity on arrow (AOA) or activity notation,
    fig. 7-10(b) sometimes refers to as i-j notation
  • Critical path method (CPM) longest path of the
    network
  • CPM helps to determine whether the activity
    critically was changes due to duration changes or
    scheduling delays

14
TYPICAL CPM ACTIVITY SEQUENCES
  • Fig. 7-12 illustrates logical sequences to
    develop CPM schedules
  • Dummy activities have zero duration, they are
    shown by broken arrows

15
Figure 7-9
Figure 7-10
  • Node to represent an event
  • Node to represent an activity
  • Activity Network in precedence Network
  • Activity network in Arrow Network

Figure 7-11 Mistake in logical sequence
16
Figure 7-12 Elements of an Arrow Network
17
Figure 7-13 Elements of a Precedence Network
18
NETWORK SCHEDULE ANALYSIS USING PRECEDENCE
NOTATION
  • Objectives of analyzing a project network
  • To find the critical activities that establishes
    longest path minimum duration of the project
  • To calculate ES times for each activity
  • To calculate LS times for each activity
  • To calculate the float, or time available for
    delays for each activity
  • Two algorithms to identify longest and critical
    path
  • Forward pass
  • Backward pass
  • Float
  • To demonstrate, consider the small procedure
    notion network shown in fig. 7-15, 7-16, 7-17,
    7-18 and 7-19
  • Forward pass algorithm EFT(I) EST(I)
    DUR(I)
  • Backward pass algorithm LST(J) LFT(J)
    DUR(J)
  • Total Float, Free Float, Interfering Float and
    Independent Float

19
Figure 7-14 a-d Preliminary Network Diagram
Fig, 7-14a Initial Sketch - Arrow Notation
Fig, 7-14b First Draft Arrow Notation
Fig, 7-14d First Draft Precedence Notation
Fig, 7-14c Initial Sketch Precedence Notation
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Figure 7-15 Precedence Notation Scheduling
Network
Figure 7-16 Calculation of EST(J)
Figure 7-17 Calculation of EST/EFT Value
25
Figure 7-19 EST/EFT and LST/LFT Values for Small
Precedence Notation Network
Figure 7-18 Calculation of LFT (I)
26
Table 7-1 Four Typed of Activity Float
27
SUMMARY
  • Resources loaded schedule
  • If 12 trucks needed and only 9 trucks available,
    there is a resource conflict or constraint
  • Construction is a resource-driven industry
  • Both time and resource availability are critical
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com