Title: PROJECT SCHEDULING
1PROJECT SCHEDULING
CHAPTER - 7
Example of a 4D Model
24D MODELING
- The Need
- 2D drawings and network diagrams do not support
timely decisions - Design Construction schedules are too abstract
to visualize and understand - 4D technologies are being used to analyze
visualize - 4D support computer based analysis of schedule
3THE TECHNOLOGY
- 4D models are very time consuming to generate
manually - The difficulty and cost of creating such models
are currently blocking their widespread adoption.
4INTRODUCTION
- The concept of project scheduling addresses the
issue of time planning and management - Simple bar charting concepts as well as network
scheduling concepts will be introduced in this
chapter
5BAR CHARTS
- The basic modeling concept of the bar chart is
the representation of a project work item or
activity as a time scale bar whose length
represents the planned duration of the activity - The length of the bar has two different meanings
- The physical length of the bar represents the
planned duration of the work item - It also provides a proportionally scaled baseline
on which to plot at successive intervals of time,
the correct percentage complete - The connected diagram of bars is celled as
bar-net
6Figure 7-1 Bar Chart Model
7Figure 7-2 Bar Chart Project Models
- Bar Chart Schedule (Plan Focus)
- Bar Chart Updating (Control Focus)
8Figure 7-3 Preliminary Bar-Net Schedule for the
Small Gas Staion
9SCHEDULING LOGIC
- To develop a schedule, the logical sequence, or
schedule logic - To understand the role played by sequencing in
developing a schedule, see fig. 7-4(a), fig.
7-4(b),Fig. 7-5 - Each element is represented by a labeled circle
(or node) - For describing adjacency, relational contact is
necessary - Nodes of fig. 7-5 can be joined by a series of
lined. If the idea of contact is expanded to
indicate the order, a directed line may be used,
fig. 7-6b or fig. 7-7 - An example of pier pile driving operation is
shown in fig.7-8(a), 7-8(b), 7-8(c), 7-8(d) - In order to schedule a project, the sequence of
activities and their relationship to one another
must be defined
10Figure 7-4 Simple Schematic Models
- Schematic view of pier
- Exploded view of pier
11Figure 7-5 Model of Pier Components
- Figure 7-6 Logical Modeling Rationales
- Adjacency of contract modeling
- Physical structure order modeling
- Physical construction order modeling
Figure 7-7 Conceptual Model of Pier component
Relationships
12Figure 7-8 Construction Sequence and Activity
Modeling
- Alternate row pile driving
- Sequential roe pile driving
- Field mishap alteration to pile driving sequence
- Bar chart of pile driving operation
13SCHEDULING NETWORKS
- Scheduling networks consist of nodes and links
- Nodes represent events fig. 7-9(a) fig. 7-9(b)
- Directional link which begins on node I and ends
on node J - Length of the link implies duration similar to a
bar in bar chart - Networks of activities using nodes and
directional links - Fig. 7-10(b), introduction of a dummy activity
- Activity on arrow (AOA) or activity notation,
fig. 7-10(b) sometimes refers to as i-j notation - Critical path method (CPM) longest path of the
network - CPM helps to determine whether the activity
critically was changes due to duration changes or
scheduling delays
14TYPICAL CPM ACTIVITY SEQUENCES
- Fig. 7-12 illustrates logical sequences to
develop CPM schedules - Dummy activities have zero duration, they are
shown by broken arrows
15Figure 7-9
Figure 7-10
- Node to represent an event
- Node to represent an activity
- Activity Network in precedence Network
- Activity network in Arrow Network
Figure 7-11 Mistake in logical sequence
16Figure 7-12 Elements of an Arrow Network
17Figure 7-13 Elements of a Precedence Network
18NETWORK SCHEDULE ANALYSIS USING PRECEDENCE
NOTATION
- Objectives of analyzing a project network
- To find the critical activities that establishes
longest path minimum duration of the project - To calculate ES times for each activity
- To calculate LS times for each activity
- To calculate the float, or time available for
delays for each activity - Two algorithms to identify longest and critical
path - Forward pass
- Backward pass
- Float
- To demonstrate, consider the small procedure
notion network shown in fig. 7-15, 7-16, 7-17,
7-18 and 7-19 - Forward pass algorithm EFT(I) EST(I)
DUR(I) - Backward pass algorithm LST(J) LFT(J)
DUR(J) - Total Float, Free Float, Interfering Float and
Independent Float
19Figure 7-14 a-d Preliminary Network Diagram
Fig, 7-14a Initial Sketch - Arrow Notation
Fig, 7-14b First Draft Arrow Notation
Fig, 7-14d First Draft Precedence Notation
Fig, 7-14c Initial Sketch Precedence Notation
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Figure 7-15 Precedence Notation Scheduling
Network
Figure 7-16 Calculation of EST(J)
Figure 7-17 Calculation of EST/EFT Value
25Figure 7-19 EST/EFT and LST/LFT Values for Small
Precedence Notation Network
Figure 7-18 Calculation of LFT (I)
26Table 7-1 Four Typed of Activity Float
27SUMMARY
- Resources loaded schedule
- If 12 trucks needed and only 9 trucks available,
there is a resource conflict or constraint - Construction is a resource-driven industry
- Both time and resource availability are critical