Title: Module N 6 SMS regulation
1Module N 6 SMSregulation
2Course structure
Safety
Module 10 Phased approach to SSP and SMS
Implementation
Management
System
Module 8 SMS planning
Module 9 SMS operation
Module 6 SMS regulation
Module 7 Introduction to SMS
3Objective
- At the end of this module participants will be
able to describe the safety management
requirements included in Annexes 1, 6, 8, 11, 13
and 14, including the relationship between a
State safety programme (SSP) and an SMS
4Outline
- SSP and SMS requirements
- What is an SSP?
- What is an SMS?
- Acceptable level of safety (ALoS)
Implementation, scope and legal considerations - Safety performance of the service providers SMS
- Performance-based regulatory environment
- Questions and answers
- Points to remember
5The big picture
- Two audience groups
- States
- Service providers
- Three distinct requirements
- State safety programme (SSP)
- Acceptable level of safety (ALoS)
- Safety management System (SMS)
- Safety performance of the SMS
- Management accountability
6Basic safety management SARPs Part I
- States shall establish a State safety programme
(SSP), in order to achieve an acceptable level of
safety in civil aviation. - The ICAO SSP framework (Module 10)
7What is an SSP?
- An integrated set of regulations and activities
aimed at improving safety. - States are responsible for establishing an SSP,
encompassing the following responsibilities
- Safety regulation
- Accident/incident investigation
- Safety assurance
- Mandatory/voluntary reporting systems
- Safety data analysis and
exchange - Safety promotion
- Further discussed in Module 10
8Basic safety management SARPs
- The acceptable level of safety (ALoS) to be
achieved shall be established by the State - When establishing ALoS, consideration must be
given to - The level of safety risk that applies
- The safety risk tolerance
- The cost/benefits of improvements to the aviation
system - The public expectations in civil aviation system
9Safety indicators and safety targets
- Safety indicators
- Fatal airline accidents/serious incidents
- Runway excursion events/ground collision events
- Development/absence of primary aviation
legislation - Development/absence of operating regulations
- Level of regulatory compliance
-
- Safety targets
- Reduction in fatal airline accident/serious
incidents - Reduction in runway excursion events/ground
collision events - Number of inspections completed quarterly
-
10Values of safety indicators and safety targets
Examples
- Value of safety indicators
- Rate/number Fatal airline accidents per
number operations - Rate/number Runway excursion events per
number operations - Rate/number Ground collision events per
number operations - Number inspections to operators completed
timeframe ...
- Value of safety targets
- Reduction by/maximum fatal airline accidents
per number operations - Reduction by/maximum runway excursion events
per number operations - Reduction by /maximum ground collision events
per number operations - Minimum number of inspections completed
timeframe
11Delivering ALoS Safety action plans
- Tools and means to deliver the safety targets of
an SSP - Operational procedures
- Technology
- Systems
- Training programmes
12ALoS Example
Values of safety targets
- Reduce by/maximum CFIT and approach and landing
accidents per number departures - Minimum number inspections to operators
completed quarterly - ...
Action plans
- CFIT training package distributed to industry and
supported by training courses - Revision and if necessary update of hiring
policy. Inspection manual updated - ...
Values of safety indicators
- Number CFIT and approach and landing accidents
per number departures - Number inspection to operators completed
quarterly - ...
State
Will comply all applicable international
standards.
13ALoS of an SSP
- Legal considerations
- Establishing ALoS for the SSP does not replace
legal, regulatory, or other already established
requirements, but it must support compliance with
them - Establishing ALoS for the SSP leaves unaffected
the obligations of States, and does not relieve
States from compliance with SARPs
14A fundamental differentiation
- Safety measurement
- Quantification of the outcomes of high-level or
high-consequence events - Accident rates
- Serious incident rates
- Quantification of high-level State functions
- Development/absence of primary aviation
legislation - Development/absence of operating regulations
- Level of regulatory compliance
15A fundamental differentiation
- Safety performance measurement
- Quantification of the outcomes of low-level, low
consequences processes - Number of FOD events per number of ramp OPS
- Number of ground vehicle events in taxiways per
number of airport OPS - Provide a measure of the actual performance of an
individual SSP or SMS (Beyond accident rates and
regulatory compliance)
16A fundamental differentiation
- Safety measurement
- Not a continuous process.
- A spot check.
- Conducted following pre-specified timeframes.
- Safety performance measurement
- Continuous process.
- Monitoring and measurement of selected
operational activities necessary for the
provision of services.
17Basic safety management SARPs Part II
- States shall require, as part of their State
safety programme (SSP), that a service provider
implements a safety management system (SMS)
acceptable to the State that, as a minimum - identifies safety hazards
- ensures that remedial action necessary to
maintain safety performance is implemented - provides for continuous monitoring and regular
assessment of the safety performance and - aims at a continuous improvement of the overall
performance of the SMS.
18Service providers
- Approved training organizations that are exposed
to safety risks during the provision of their
services - Aircraft operators
- Approved maintenance organizations
- Organizations responsible for design and/or
manufacture of aircraft - Air traffic services providers
- Certified aerodromes
- The ICAO SMS framework (Module 8)
19What is an SMS?
- A systematic approach to managing safety,
including the necessary organizational
structures, accountabilities, policies and
procedures - Service providers are responsible for
establishing an SMS - States are responsible, under the SSP, for the
acceptance and oversight of organizations SMS
20Safety performance of services providers SMS
- Expresses the safety objectives of a service
provider. - Provides measurable reference for measuring the
safety performance of an SMS - Within each State, the safety performance of each
SMS will separately be agreed between the State
oversight authority and individual aviation
organizations - Agreed safety performance should be commensurate
to the - complexity of individual service provider
specific operational context and - availability of service provider resources to
address them
21Safety performance of an SMS
- The safety performance of an SMS represents
safety performance measurement exclusively - The safety performance of an SMS is expressed in
practical terms by two measures or metrics - Safety performance indicators
- Safety performance targets
- It is delivered through various tools and means
- Safety requirements
22Safety performance of an SMS
- Safety performance indicators
- Short-term, tactical, measurable objectives
reflecting the safety performance of an SMS - They include safety performance measurement
exclusively - Expressed in numerical terms
- Safety performance targets
- Long-term, strategic, measurable objectives
reflecting the safety performance of an SMS - They include safety performance measurement
exclusively. - Expressed in numerical terms
23Safety performance of an SMS
- Legal considerations
- Establishing safety performance for the SMS
leaves unaffected the obligations of services
providers and other related parties, and it does
not relieve the services providers and other
related parties from compliance with SARPs and/or
national regulations, as applicable
24Safety performance of an SMS
Safety performance targets
- Maintain no more than 20 events of unauthorized
vehicles on the taxiways per 10,000 operations. - By January 2010 reduce to 8 FOD events on the
apron per 10,000 operations.
Action Plans
- Training course for drivers / installation of
specific signage. - Thrice-daily walk-in ramp inspection programme.
-
Safety performance indicators
- 20 events of unauthorized vehicles on the
taxiways per 10,000 operations. - 15 FOD events on the apron per 10,000 operations.
- ...
Service provider
Will comply all applicable national and
international standards.
25Basic safety management SARPs Part III
- A safety management system (SMS) shall clearly
define lines of safety accountability throughout
a service provider organization, including a
direct accountability for safety on the part of
senior management - (Accountability Obligation or willingness to
account for ones actions)
26SSP SMS relationship
State Safety Programme (SSP)
Objective Safety risk management
Service delivery
Objective Support production goals and customer
satisfaction
Organizations Safety Management system (SMS)
Objective Safety risk management
27In summary
State
Service provider
- States shall establish a State safety programme
(SSP), in order to achieve an acceptable level of
safety (ALoS) in civil aviation. - The acceptable level of safety (ALoS) to be
achieved shall be established by the State.
- Identify safety hazards.
- Ensure ensures remedial action to maintain safety
performance. - Provides continuing monitoring and regular
assessment of the safety performance. - Aims at a continuous improvement of the overall
performance of the SMS.
28The objective (Remember Module 1?)
Realistic implementation
Safety management
Performance based
ICAO SARPS
Prescriptive
29In summary
Prescription
Performance
2.1 Safety requirements for service providers
SMS The State has established the controls which
govern how service providers will identify
hazards and manage safety risks. 3.1 Safety
oversight The State has established mechanisms
to ensure an effective monitoring of the eight
critical elements of the safety oversight
function.
2.2 Agreement on service providers safety
performance The State has agreed with individual
service providers on the safety performance of
their SMS. 3.2 Safety data collection, analysis
and exchange The State has established
mechanisms to ensure the capture and storage of
data on hazards and safety risks at both an
individual and aggregate States level. 3.3
Safety data driven targeting of oversight on
areas of greater concern or need The State has
established procedures to prioritize inspections,
audits and surveys towards those areas of greater
safety concern or need, as identified by the
analysis of data on hazards, their consequences
in operations, and the assessed safety risks.
30In summary
Safety performance targets
- Maintain no more than 20 events of unauthorized
vehicles on the taxiways per 10,000 operations. - By January 2009 reduce to 8 FOD events on the
apron per 10,000 operations.
Action plans
- Training course for drivers / installation of
specific signage. - Thrice-daily walk-in ramp inspection programme.
-
Performance
Safety performance indicators
- 20 events of unauthorized vehicles on the
taxiways per 10,000 operations. - 15 FOD events on the apron per 10,000 operations.
- ...
Service provider
Will comply all applicable national and
international standards.
Prescription
31Questions and answers
32Questions and answers
- Q What are the main responsibilities in a
State safety programme (SSP)? - A
- Safety regulation
- Accident/incident investigation
- Safety assurance
- Mandatory/voluntary reporting systems
- Safety data analysis and exchange
- Safety promotion
Slide number 7
33Questions and answers
- Q What is a safety management system (SMS)?
- A
- A systematic approach to managing safety,
including the necessary organizational
structures, accountabilities, policies and
procedures.
Slide number 19
34Points to remember
- SSP
- SMS
- Acceptable of level of safety (ALoS)
- Safety performance of the SMS
- Management accountability
- Prescription vs. Performance
35Module N 6 SMSregulation