Regulation of immunity through T-cell competition for interleukin-2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Regulation of immunity through T-cell competition for interleukin-2

Description:

T helper (Th) cells are a type of white blood cell that is part of the body's immune response. ... Baecher-Allan, C., Wolf, E., & Hafler, DA (2005) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: seasU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regulation of immunity through T-cell competition for interleukin-2


1
Regulation of immunity through T-cell
competition for interleukin-2
  • Shannon Telesco
  • Advisor Ravi Radhakrishnan, PhD

2
Regulation of the immune system
  • T helper (Th) cells are a type of white blood
    cell that is part of the bodys immune response.
    Th cells recognize foreign antigens and activate
    additional immune cells to mount an inflammatory
    reaction.
  • T regulatory (Treg) cells are a specialized
    subpopulation of T cells that act to suppress
    activation of the immune system and thereby
    maintain immune system homeostasis and tolerance
    to self-antigens.
  • Th and Treg cells compete for a common growth
    factor called interleukin-2 (IL-2). The outcome
    of this competition determines whether the immune
    system will become activated or suppressed.

3
Competition for IL-2
  • Treg are controlled by Th cells via the level of
    available IL-2.
  • Under tolerogenic conditions, Th cells produce
    low amounts of IL-2 in response to self-antigen
    (Ag) stimulation.
  • Under immunogenic conditions, Th cells produce
    high amounts of IL-2, allowing activation of both
    Th and Treg cells.

Scheffold, A., Huhn, J., Hofer, T (2005).
Regulation of CD4CD25 regulatory T cell
activity it takes (IL-)two to tango. Eur. J.
Immunol. 351336.
4
The IL-2 trafficking system
kon
koff
krec
kdeg
k1 (Th cell) or k2 (Treg cell)
5
Scaling the System
Scaled Parameters
6
Defining IL-2 parameters
Parameter Definition Value
kon rate constant for ligand/receptor association at cell surface 1.38E9/(Mmin)
koff rate constant for ligand/receptor dissociation at cell surface 0.0138/min
kfe rate constant for ligand/receptor association in endosome 1.1E8/(Mmin)
kre rate constant for ligand/receptor dissociation in endosome 0.1104/min
kt rate constant for constitutive receptor endocytosis 0.007/min
kdeg rate constant for lysosomal degradation of receptor 0.035/min
ke rate constant for endocytosis of complexes 0.04/min
krec rate constant for recycling of intracellular ligand to cell surface 0.15/min
Vs rate of new receptor synthesis 11/min
Ve endosomal volume 1E-14 L
NA Avogadros number 6.02E23
Q Rate of ligand secretion by Th cell 10-500/min
kmed Rate of ligand degradation in extracellular space 0.02/min
H Distance between Th and Treg (scaled by rcell) 5 µm
7
Ligand diffusion in spherical coordinates
where
Solution
Boundary conditions
8
Results Criteria for inhibition
  • Two criteria for successful inhibition of Th cell

ltlt1 (ligand must be limiting)
gt1
and
9
Critical autocrine number
  • Critical Au is more difficult to achieve when
    Treg is ON.
  • Treg cell required to prevent Th cell activation
    in response to self-Ag.

10
Parameter sensitivity isolated Th cell
  • Th cell secretes ligand into an infinite domain
  • Because ligand depletion effects are negligible,
    system is insensitive to endosomal parameters

11
Parameter sensitivity Th Treg cells
  • Because Vs2/Vs1 gt 1, Th cell is more sensitive to
    Treg cells parameters
  • Th more sensitive to Treg for all parameters
    directly related to number of receptors
  • Th more sensitive to itself for all parameters
    related to number of complexes

12
Parameter sensitivity Th Treg cells
  • Because Vs2/Vs1 gt 1, Treg is more sensitive to
    its own parameters
  • Treg is relatively sensitive to Kd1, but not to
    any of Th parameters that directly relate to
    receptor number

13
Phase plot Th cell, low Q
  • For maximum values of Vs1 Vs2, Th forms lt50
    complexes (insufficient for activation).

14
Phase plot Treg cell, low Q
  • Both Th Treg are mildly activated at low ligand
    secretion rates.

15
Phase plot Th cell, high Q
  • At high Q, neither cell inhibits the other

16
Phase plot Treg cell, high Q
  • Both Th Treg are fully activated at high Q

17
Regulation of immunity
  • Key feature of the immune system is mutual
    regulation of Th Treg cells.
  • At low levels of ligand production, corresponding
    to stimulation by self-Ags, neither cell is fully
    activated.
  • At high levels of ligand production,
    corresponding to stimulation by foreign Ags, both
    cells become activated in a sequential manner.

De la Rosa, M., Rutz, S., Dorninger, H., and
Scheffold, A. (2004). Interleukin-2 is essential
for CD4CD25 regulatory T cell function. Eur.
J. Immunol. 342480.
18
Food for thought
  • Can additional immunological states be identified
    as a function of the cell-cell distance?
  • What are the effects of multiple Treg cells on
    suppression of Th cell?
  • How is Th/Treg cell interaction affected by
    mediation by an antigen-presenting cell (APC)?

19
Acknowledgments
  • Ravi Radhakrishnan, PhD
  • Casim Sarkar, PhD

20
References
  • Baecher-Allan, C., Wolf, E., Hafler, DA (2005).
    Functional analysis of highly defined,
    FACS-isolated populations of human regulatory
    CD4CD25 T cells. Clinical Immunology 11510.
  • Barthlott, T., Moncrieffe, H., Veldhoen, M.,
    Atkins, C., Christensen, J., OGarra, A., and
    Stockinger, B. (2005). CD25 CD4 T cells
    compete with naïve CD4 T cells for IL-2 and
    exploit it for the induction of IL-10 production.
    International Immunology 17279.
  • Batsilas, L., Berezhkovskii, A.M., Shvartsman,
    S.Y. (2003). Stochastic model of autocrine and
    paracrine signals in cell culture assays.
    Biophysical J. 853659.
  • Fallon, E.M., Liparoto, S.F., Lee, K.J.,
    Ciardelli, T.L., Lauffenburger, D.A. (2000).
    Increased endosomal sorting of ligand to
    recycling enhances potency of an interleukin-2
    analog. JBC 275(10)6790.
  • Oberg, H-H, Wesch, D., Lenke, J., Kabelitz, D
    (2006). An optimized method for the functional
    analysis of human regulatory T cells.
    Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 64353.
  • Rao, B.M., Girvin, A.T., Ciardelli, T.,
    Lauffenburger, D.A., Wittrup, K.D. (2003).
    Interleukin-2 mutants with enhanced areceptor
    subunit binding affinity. Protein Engineering
    16(12)1081.
  • Rao, B.M., Driver, I., Lauffenburger, D.A.,
    Wittrup, K.D. (2004). Interleukin 2 (IL-2)
    variants engineered for increased IL-2 receptor
    asubunit affinity exhibit increased potency
    arising from a cell surface ligand reservoir
    effect. Molecular Pharmacology 66864.
  • Scheffold, A., Huhn, J., Hofer, T (2005).
    Regulation of CD4CD25 regulatory T cell
    activity it takes (IL-)two to tango. Eur. J.
    Immunol. 351336.
  • Smith, K.A. (2004). The Quantal Theory of how
    the Immune System Discriminates Between Self and
    Non-self. Medical Immunology 33.
  • Thornton, A.M., Donovan, E.E., Piccirillo, C.A.,
    Shevach, E.M. (2004). Cutting edge IL-2 is
    critically required for the in vitro activation
    of CD4CD25 T cell suppressor function. J
    Immunology 1726519.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com