CONSTRAINTS ON IMAGERY I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

CONSTRAINTS ON IMAGERY I

Description:

When ambiguous figures are visually presented to a naive viewer, a perceptual ... Ambiguous figures demonstrate conscious percept of an external stimulus contains ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: davidp211
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CONSTRAINTS ON IMAGERY I


1
CONSTRAINTS ON IMAGERY I
  • David Pearson
  • Room T10, William Guild Building
  • d.g.pearson_at_abdn.ac.uk

2
  • Over last 30 years the majority of research on
    mental imagery has tended to focus on
    similarities between imagery and perception
    rather than potential differences.
  • Finke argues for a functional role for imagery
    during cognition i.e., that imagery can support
    the same kind of discovery and interpretation
    processes that occur during normal perception.

3
  • For this to occur
  • mental images must depict the geometry of a shape
    sufficiently well enough to allow for mental
    reinterpretation.
  • individuals must be able to apply shape
    classification procedures to the information
    depicted by mental images.

4
(No Transcript)
5
Detection of Embedded Patterns
  • Reed and Johnsen (1975) contrasted the detection
    of embedded figures in abstract patterns in
    either a perceptual or imagery condition.
  • Perceptual condition participants shown possible
    part, followed by an abstract pattern. Given 10
    seconds to decide whether previously presented
    part could be detected in pattern or not.

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
IMAGERY CONDITION
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Results of Reed Johnsen (1975)
  • In perceptual condition participants failed to
    detect parts embedded in the patterns on 14 of
    trials.
  • In imagery condition this rose to 48.
  • This increased to 72 if trials were eliminated
    in which the parts had been detected without
    inspecting a mental image.
  • Results suggest that people may find it difficult
    to apply shape classification procedures to
    mental images in order to recognise embedded
    patterns.
  • This mainly applies to the detection of implicit
    information within the pattern i.e., shapes
    which do not form part of the perceptually
    dominant structure.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Restructuring Combining Within Imagery
  • Verstijnen et al. (1998) argue that mental
    discoveries result from two main processes
    restructuring the initial conception of a
    pattern, and combining separate parts into a new
    pattern.
  • Verstijnen et al. carried out a series of
    experiments using a Component Detection task.

14
(No Transcript)
15
Results (Verstijnen et al., 1998)
16
  • Design students experience in drawing techniques
    allowed them to overcome the limitations of
    imagery by externally representing their mental
    image.
  • This is known as providing stimulus support.
  • In a second experiment, Verstijnen et al.
    examined how often novice and expert participants
    used sketching during the task with both explicit
    and implicit target component parts.

17
age of time sketching for explicit and implicit
targets
18
  • Both groups used significantly more sketching for
    implicit rather than explicit targets.
  • Provides support for idea that the restructuring
    of a pattern is difficult to accomplish in
    imagery without external support.

19
Interpretation of ambiguous figures in imagery
  • Other research which suggests that images do not
    function exactly as percepts has been carried out
    using perceptually ambiguous figures.

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
  • When ambiguous figures are visually presented to
    a naive viewer, a perceptual reversal occurs -
    viewer spontaneously shifts their perception of
    the figure between alternative interpretations.
  • Ambiguous figures demonstrate conscious percept
    of an external stimulus contains more information
    than is specified in the retinal image alone.
  • Percepts result from an interpretation of the
    information conveyed through our senses.
  • If images are functionally equivalent to
    percepts, then ambiguous figures should
    spontaneously reverse in both imagery and
    perception.

23
  • This was directly tested by Chambers Reisberg
    (1985) using the Jastrow ambiguous figure (1900).

24
  • Participants shown figure for 5 seconds.
  • Participants asked to form an image of the figure
    and then discover the alternative interpretation
    of the figure just by inspecting the mental
    image.
  • Participants had previously been given examples
    of other ambiguous figures, and were given
    specific hints on how to reconstrue the figure.
  • If participants were unable to reconstrue the
    image, they then drew it out onto a blank sheet
    of paper.

25
  • Results show
  • Successful figure reversal using imagery alone 0
  • Successful figure reversal using drawing 100
  • This study was hugely influential as it seemed to
    demonstrate a massive difference between images
    and percepts.
  • .... to say the least, this seems to be a
    regard in which visual images are conspicuously
    not like pictures. Reisberg (1996)

26
  • Result appear to conflict with those of Finke
    (Finke Slayton, 1988 Finke, 1990).
  • Verstijnen argues that creative synthesis and
    invention require a combination process, while
    the reconstrual of ambiguous patterns and the
    discovery of embedded figures relies on the
    restructuring of an existing pattern.
  • Evidence suggests restructuring is much harder to
    accomplish using imagery, unless some form of
    external support (like drawing) is available.

27
  • Pearson, Logie and Green (1996) examined
    performance of the guided image manipulation task
    (Finke et al., 1989) in either imagery or drawing
    conditions.

28
Number of correct identifications with and
without drawing
29
  • Evidence suggests that under certain conditions
    imagery fails to support novel discoveries which
    can easily be made under comparable perceptual
    conditions.
  • Two main factors may potentially limit imagery
    performance
  • (a) constraints imposed by the resource
    limitations of the cognitive processes which
    underlie imagery.
  • (b) constraints imposed by the differences
    between internally-generated images and
    externally-created percepts.

30
The Resource Limitations Hypothesis
  • Fundamental concept in modern cognitive
    psychology
  • All forms of cognitive activity require mental
    resources to be carried out.
  • 2. These resources are finite in nature, and
    subject to capacity limitations.
  • 3. If the resources necessary to carry out a
    cognitive activity exceed the amount of resources
    available, then serious disruption of cognitive
    activity will result.

31
(No Transcript)
32
Resource Limitations in Imagery
  • The generation and maintenance of mental images
    requires mental resources.
  • The more complex the imagery task, the more
    resources will be consumed.
  • If the resource requirements of an imagery task
    exceed the capacity of the imagery system, the
    accurate performance of the imagery task will
    begin to fail.

33
Effects of complexity on mental rotation (Rock,
1973)
34
  • The generation and maintenance of percepts does
    not place great demands on mental resources
    because they are externally-created.

35
(No Transcript)
36
  • The generation and maintenance of percepts does
    not place great demands on mental resources
    because they are externally-created.
  • More mental resources will therefore be available
    when trying to make a discovery from a percept
    than will be available if using an equivalent
    mental image.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com