WAR In IRAQ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

WAR In IRAQ

Description:

Most people question its morals, its legality, and if it was the just action to make. ... of food, building supplies, and water to use, and also issue a public apology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: Raf109
Category:
Tags: iraq | war | apology | civilians

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WAR In IRAQ


1
WAR In IRAQ
  • Just-war Theory

2
  • The Iraq war is debatably the most controversial
    war to ever take place. Most people question its
    morals, its legality, and if it was the just
    action to make. The main issue in Iraq is if it
    was just to invade Iraq without solid proof of
    nuclear weapons.
  • Of course The United States government decided it
    was the correct thing to do, but almost 70
    percent of the citizens disagree with their
    government on the issue.
  • There is also the issue if the troops should be
    brought back home, and if it follows the just war
    theory. In most opinions, there was not enough
    evidence to claim Iraq had nuclear weapons, 4
    years later we can see this claim was true.
    America was wrong to invade Iraq because, of the
    just war theory, lack of evidence, and the
    disregard for human rights.

3
In just war theory there must be ten things
evident
  • just cause
  • legitimate authority
  • comparative justice
  • right intention
  • probability of success
  • Proportionality
  • last resort
  • immunity of non-combatants
  • Proportionality
  • and right intention

4
  • For there to be just cause, there must be a
    real, lasting, grave, and certain damage
    inflicted by an aggressor on a nation or a
    community of nations. In Iraq there was obviously
    no just cause. Iraq did not attack the United
    States, and USA did not find any evidence of
    nuclear weapons.
  • Legitimate authority is the right to declare
    war of defence belongs to those who protect the
    responsibility of the common good Bush
    technically does have the authority to declare a
    war, but it brings up the question why a majority
    of the worlds leaders decided against going to
    war.

5
  • Comparative justice is the right and values in
    the conflict must also be so important they
    justify killing. The conflict which has risen in
    Iraq defiantly does not justify killing. Again
    there were no evidence nuclear weapons, nor did
    they start a war with America. Probability of
    success is, the odds of success should be
    weighed against the human cost of war. Both
    sides Iraq and America are suffering extreme
    causalities. Again the war decision does not pass
    this test human death is not worth the cause of
    which they are fighting for.

6
  • Proportionality is the damage to be inflicted
    and the costs incurred by the war must be
    proportionate to the good expected. More damage
    is being done every day Iraq has been demolished
    to a certain extent. There has still been no good
    which has come out of the Iraq war. There is only
    last resort once all peace talks have failed and
    all efforts have failed. I believed this had
    failed in Iraq there was only one search for
    nuclear weapons, and view peace talks. There
    could have been more effort, but Bush was trigger
    happy. Immunity of non-combatants simply means
    that civilians must be spared at all and any
    cost. In Iraq to date there have been almost
    70,000 Iraqi casualties. Obviously this has not
    been followed the death toll should be far less.

7
  • Proportionality means that minimum force must be
    used to obtain military objectives to lower
    damage to civilians and casualties. Again 70,000
    Iraqi civilians have been killed, and many parts
    of Iraq are demolished, so this has not been
    followed. The last theory of just war theory is
    right intention this means political and
    military leaders must always see that peace with
    justice is the only reason for the use of arms.
    The intention of the Iraq war is always in
    question. Many think Bush went into war for oil,
    or to complete tasks his father failed at. In my
    views only one of the possible ten are evident in
    the just war theory, and the one is debatable.
    This clearly shows in the Catholic view that this
    war is not just.

8
Solution
  • Of course there is no easy solution to this war.
    The Bush administration does not want to pull
    their men and women out because too much has been
    invested in these four years. If they pull out
    now, all the money and effort would have been
    gone to waste. If America stays, it will only
    cost more money, more death, and more conflict
    inside of Iraq. I believe the only solution is
    for America to leave Iraq. America has lost this
    war, it is too late to try and makes things
    right. There comes a time where you have to cut
    your losses, and leave with some dignity. Iraq
    will one day need to learn how to govern itself,
    and be its own nation. While America is trying to
    run Iraq, its elections, and governments, it
    cant do this. Iraq cannot make its own progress
    until they learn by their own successes and
    failures. America should set a date in the recent
    future to leave, donate a large supply of food,
    building supplies, and water to use, and also
    issue a public apology
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com