Public Opinion Methodologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Opinion Methodologies

Description:

Population of people that the survey is to provide data about (usually a constant) ... people's dependence on the media, and their ambivalence about that dependence. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: oboydb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Opinion Methodologies


1
Public Opinion Methodologies
  • Main Options

2
4 principal methods
  • survey research or polling
  • focus groups
  • experimental research
  • analysis of mass media content

3
The Survey
  • Key elements of the survey include
  • Population of people that the survey is to
    provide data about (usually a constant)
  • The kind of sample of individuals drawn from that
    population
  • The method of data gathering used personal,
    phone or mail interviews
  • The kind of questionnaire or interviewing
    instrument used
  • The kinds of analyses done and inferences drawn.

4
Kinds of survey
  • Polls are a special kind of simple, descriptive
    survey. More sophisticated surveys seek to
    explain why characteristics of a population are
    as they are or how they relate to others.
  • Census surveys attempt to count everyone in the
    nation.
  • Sample surveys take a sample group out of the
    total population.
  • Probability sampling methods use statistical
    methods to choose who will be included in the
    sample.
  • Non-probability surveys may be useful in helping
    to develop concepts and measures.
    Person-in-the-street or mall-intercept are
    examples. Surveys are typically cross-sectional.
  • Panel surveys interview people at different
    times.
  • Surveys may be a part of field experiments in
    which samples may be divided into experimental
    and other groups, but are they representative?

5
Problems with surveys
  • If people dont want to be interviewed/surveyed.
  • Telephone interviews are cost-effective, but
    limited to rather easy-to-read-and-comprehend
    question and response categories.
  • In-person interviews (good rapport at great
    cost, therefore low numbers
  • Mail-administered surveys (cheap but horrific
    response rates may be good for smaller,
    specialized populations that have an interest in
    the subject-matter) they allow more complex
    questions).
  • Other fax and email, Internet (counting hits).

6
Problems with surveys questionnaire design
  • Trade off between complexity of real-life and
    getting the general message across to broad
    population
  • opinion items are often difficult to ask, and
    produce the least reliable responses (best to
    test how knowledgeable people are first, or give
    them some information first).
  • Hypothetical questions produce poor answers.
  • Questions can be leading (invite a given
    response) or double-barreled (cover more than
    one issue).
  • Questions need to avoid respondents wanting to
    give socially-acceptable answers.
  • Question order effects can also be a problem
    early questions can produce an attitude
    commitment that affects answers to later
    questions.
  • Sometimes, multiple indicators are needed for
    complex, subtle or hidden attitudes.
  • Interview training is critical.

7
Problems with polling surveys
  • Pollsters can ask questions in biased or
    distorted ways.
  • Push polls or telephone surveys on behalf of
    one candidate, in which views of opposing
    candidates are purposively misrepresented.
  • Too much reliance on polls produces a leadership
    vacuum, reduces innovativeness, and unpopular
    actions
  • Political polls may lead to candidates telling
    people what they want to hear.
  • Polls focus too much attention on the aggregate,
    not enough on individual motivation and activity.

8
Focus Groups
  • Carefully planned discussions designed to obtain
    perceptions on a defined area of interest in a
    permissive, non-threatening environment
  • Are revealing of the role of social interaction
    in opinion formation and expression
  • Allow for probing and depth
  • Are not reliant on the dynamics of the
    respondent-interviewer relationship
  • Are a check against the researchers bias,
    open-ended flexibility.
  • Participants talk in their own language.
  • They produce data and insight that would not be
    available without the group.
  • They are good supplements to other methodologies
  • They demonstrate opinion formation, a process of
    continuous construction through a myriad of
    complex schemata.
  • Focus groups reveal the extreme contestability of
    many public issues, and they help reveal peoples
    dependence on the media, and their ambivalence
    about that dependence.
  • Limitations settings of discussion are less
    natural than in participant observation results
    less easily analyzed than in survey research not
    quite like real life participants feel on the
    record.

9
Experimental Method
  • Experimental method gives control. Experimenter
    randomly assign populations to experimental and
    control groups, subjects experimental group to
    the experimental stimulus, organizes pre-tests
    and post-tests, while holding all extraneous
    factors constant.
  • Gets at variables that it would be very difficult
    to research in uncontrolled conditions. It is
    possible to test sophisticated hypotheses.
  • Limitations difficult balance between internal
    validity and convincing simulations of the
    real-world they can usually only cope with a
    limited number of variables at a time.
  • Subjects may second-guess the researcher.

10
Content analysis
  • Mass media products must resonate with the public
    to do well, so they must be representative, in
    some ways, of public opinion.
  • Is unobtrusive and yields rich data.
  • Limitations coding schemes may be biased
    content analysis focuses on manifest rather than
    latent content. It doesnt deal well with visual
    content. Very labor intensive and costly.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com