NewParticapantOrientation

1
Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless
Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title
11N Liaison Channel Bonding Report. Date
Submitted 21 January 2005 Source James D.
Allen, Appairent Technologies. Address 150
Lucius Gordon Drive, Rochester, NY,
14586 Voice585-214-2465, FAX [phone],
E-Mail allen at appairent.com Re
Abstract Liaison Report Purpose For the
purpose of informing the body. Notice This
document has been prepared to assist the IEEE
P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion
and is not binding on the contributing
individual(s) or organization(s). The material in
this document is subject to change in form and
content after further study. The contributor(s)
reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw
material contained herein. Release The
contributor acknowledges and accepts that this
contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may
be made publicly available by P802.15.
NOTE Update all red fields replacing with your
information they are required. This is a manual
update in appropriate fields. All Blue fields
are informational and are to be deleted. Black
stays. After updating delete this box/paragraph.
2
11N Liaison and 40 MHz Channel Bonding Report

• January 21, 2005
• Monterey, CA

3
Bonding Report

• Presented document 11-05-0075-00-000n-Coexistence
  Issues.ppt., Thursday at 8 am at the
  802.19/801.11n joint coexistence meeting.
• A .11n member clarified that MANDITORY 40 MHz
  refers to its status in the Draft, not that it
  was mandatory to always operate at 40 MHz.
• Generally agreed that the issue is Coexistence
  and not just 40 MHz and not just 802.15.
• Work will continue as the proposals are
  clarified.

4
Attribution

• These next slides are taken for the .11n Chairs
  closing report, document 11-05-0082-00-000n

5
Technical/Comparison Presentations

• Non-proposal authors
• 05-1627 , Field Measurements of 2x2 MIMO
  Communications, Babak Daneshrad
• 05-1625, TGn Consensus Proposal, Tim Wakeley
• 05-1644, Service Provider Requirements, Brian
  Ford
• 05-0020, Required Feature set for Closed Loop
  Beam Forming, Aryan Saed

6
Technical/Comparison Presentations by

• Monday
• 05-1630-00 - Closed vs Open Loop Comparisons,
  John Ketchum
• 04-1579-01 ACI Results, Dave Hedberg
• Tuesday
• 05-1634-00 - Comparison of Value of proposed MAC
  features, Adrian Stephens
• 05-006-01 Backward Compatibility of CDD
  Preambles, - Tsuguhide Aoki
• 05-1581-01 Preamble Power Variations, Dave
  Hedberg
• 05-1616-01 WWiSE Pilot Performance, Allert van
  Zelst
• 05-1636-01 Impact of Fewer Pilot Tones on .11n
  Phy Perf, Won-Joon Choi
• 05-1590-00 STS Compatibility with Legacy
  802.11g devices, Chris Hansen
• Wednesday
• 05-1635-01 Preambles and MIMO Beam Forming ,
  John Sadowsky
• 05-1645-02 Preambles, Beam Forming for WWiSE,
  Chris Hansen

7
Ballot Results
Proposal MITMOT
Proposal TGnSync
Proposal WWiSE
Consider Consider
23 9.62
132 55.23
84 35.15
8
Tentative TGn Plans for March

• Technical Proposal Updates FR (CC)10 days
  before meeting Friday March 4
• Email questions to proposal authors
  Tuesday March 8
• Written responses posted to server
  Friday March 11
• Administrative introduction (1 hr)
• Comparison reports (1 hr)
• Market/application reports (.5hr)
• Proposal presentations (1 to 2hr blocks)
• Technical comparison , clarifications,
  discrepancies
• Presentation time, random speaker sequence for
  each round
• Additional technical presentations (3hr)
• .19 presentations on Coexistence Assurance (1hr
  if possible)
• QA 4 hr (2hr written 2hrs live, separate time
  for non-aligned)
• Down select vote - special order (1 hr)
• Confirmation vote- as much of step 17 as possible
  in March
• Elect Technical editor (½ hour)
• Plans for May (1/2 hour)