Title: Protecting Children Directions for Reform
1Protecting ChildrenDirections for Reform
- Mary Ann OLoughlinDecember 2003
2Outline
- Context for change
- Directions for reform
- a community partnership for the welfare and
protection of children
3Child protection does well what it was set up to
do
- Intent of the Children and Young Persons Act
- for protection of children who have suffered
significant harm - not to be confused with long-term social welfare
programs - emergency service short-term intervention
- Trigger for intervention
- notification of suspected child abuse
- Service response
- investigation
- referral to services
- protective intervention
- protection orders
- out-of-home care placement
4Effectiveness of approach
- A clear advantage
- effective in identifying and responding to
critical episodes of allegations of child abuse
and neglect - with the emphasis on determining the substance of
a notified episode and acting decisively. - This is consistent with its intended role.
5Problems with this approach
- Statutory basis of child protection drives the
process - limiting the responses available and their
flexibility - Increasingly, cases are of a more chronic nature
- addressing the problems, enabling the families to
better cope with the problems, requires more
flexible responses and sustained support - Children who are at lower risk often fall outside
the mandate of the legislation - opportunities are missed early on to provide
positive assistance that can help the families
avoid major problems in the future.
6Key characteristics of cases first investigated
7A revolving client population
- 62 of children notified have been notified
before - 50 of children investigated have been
investigated before - 40 of children in cases substantiated for child
abuse or neglect have been substantiated before
8Projections
- Based on current experience
- 19.3 of the cohort born in 2003 who grow up in
Victoria will be notified at some time during
their childhood or adolescence - 9 will be the subject of an investigation for
alleged abuse or neglect - 4.5 will be the subject of a substantiated case
of child abuse during childhood or adolescence
9Causes of child abuse
- There is no single, sufficient or necessary cause
of child abuse - the problems that lead to child abuse are usually
entrenched and intractable. - But whether child abuse will take place in the
face of these problems is the balance of stresses
and supports. - Need for more sustained and broad-ranging
approaches to families that go beyond immediate
safety issues.
10Directions for reform
- If government aims to solve (or at least
minimise) the problem of child abuse, to do so
effectively requires it to become involved in
broader issues, earlier, and with greater
flexibility.
11Community partnership for the welfare and
protection of children
- Based on a unifying framework for the welfare and
protection of children. - Four key elements
- partnership supported by new infrastructure,
processes and governance arrangements - a new model for intake, assessment and referral
- a broader range of service responses and
- a different approach to out-of-home care.
12A unifying framework
- The UKs Children Act 1989 embraces the idea of
simultaneously safeguarding and promoting
childrens welfare - sets out the obligations of Government to assist
families who need help in bringing up their
children - provides for protection of children where they
are suffering from harm - A defining characteristic of the UK framework is
the acknowledgment that child protection cannot
be separated from policies to improve childrens
lives as a whole.
13Minister Garbutts 4 June Statement
- The government's emphasis is on prevention. We
will - provide support for the development of all
children - identify vulnerable children and families before
they encounter difficulties and provide special
support - divert children and families at risk into
appropriate community based support and offer
flexible alternatives to them when they need
help.
14(No Transcript)
15Aims of the centres
- To identify earlier families who are in need by
encouraging families to approach services for
support. - To better integrate child protection services
into the fabric of community life. - To broaden responsibility for child protection by
increasing community service providers
understanding of and responsibility for at-risk
children. - To foster greater service collaboration and
coordination.
16Community support networks
- Builds upon the work being undertaken by the
Innovation Projects set up by DHS - Key point
- responding effectively to the complex and diverse
needs of vulnerable families requires a network
of locally coordinated, community-based services,
delivering an integrated service response. - Networks include child protection, family
support, health, housing, police and education.
17Governance issues
- Challenges for building an effective partnership
among government and non-government agencies - separate governance and management structures
- separate priorities, planning requirements and
funding streams - separate review and accountability arrangements
- lack of shared responsibility for service
provision - poor mechanisms for interagency consultation and
support.
18Integrated governance
- Integrated governance permits, supports and
facilitates cooperation and collaboration among
different agencies - shared vision and goals
- key tasks to achieve them
- agreed respective roles and responsibilities
- indicators to judge effectiveness
- facilitative structures and processes such as
common assessment frameworks, the pooling of
funding and resources, and co-located services. - Legislative support would be required
- consistent with a unifying framework for the
protection and welfare of children.
19Intake
- Currently, access to child protection is via a
single access and entry point notification. - Appropriately, a high threshold is applied
- only 35 of notifications are investigated
- of which only 60 are substantiated.
- Possibility of voluntary referral, but no follow
up. - Access to intensive family support services is
also through the protective gateway.
20(No Transcript)
21New model for intake
- Threshold issue who would be responsible for
intake and initial assessment? - Consistent with a broader partnership for the
protection and welfare of children,
responsibility would belong to an integrated
child protection and family support service - The Child and Adolescent Assessment Team, located
at the Community Child and Family Support Centre - people with expertise and experience with
vulnerable families and children - including, but not restricted to, child
protection officers.
22Initial assessment two possible decisions
- A notification that a child has suffered, or is
likely to suffer, significant harm - an immediate child protection investigation.
- A child concern, indicating that a family is
facing severe stresses and problems that are
impacting on the childs welfare, and there are
concerns about the parents capacity to deal with
them - a family assessment by the Child and Adolescent
Assessment Team over a longer period, leading to
more tailored responses - parental involvement would be voluntary.
23Broader range of service responses
- Community Child and Family Support Centre
- Community Support Network
- Intermediate level responses
- Other services not part of the Centre or the
Network, such as Centrelink.
24Intermediate level responses in child protection
- The role is to seek agreement with the family on
a plan, including support measures, to keep the
child safe. - They allow for dialogue, negotiation and
deliberation with families outside of formal
legal processes - emphasis on flexible responses for families,
building on capacities - Cases would be referred directly following a
child protection assessment or a family
assessment, or from the Community Support
Network. - Participation would be voluntary for families.
- But child protection officers would retain
existing statutory powers to issue a Protection
Application if they considered the child was not
being adequately protected.
25Available and effective services
- Two very important conditions
- the services must be adequately resourced and
available and - the services must be effective.
26Effectiveness of services
- Research into effective services highlights the
necessity for the early provision of - intensive, comprehensive services
- that are flexible to the changing needs and
circumstances of families and children.
27Approach to out-of-home care
- Objective to reduce time spent in out-of-home
care - Two general ways
- by reducing time in care through preventative and
diversionary strategies - for children who spend long periods of time in
care with no or little chance of reunification
with their parents, through a move to more stable
and permanent care arrangements, such as
permanent care or adoption.
28Experience of children in out-of-home care
- During 2001-02, 8,628 children in out-of-home
care - At 30 June 2002, 34 of children in care for 2
years or more - Cohort of 1997-98 at end of 5-year period, 46
remained in care - for 27 of cohort, no attempt at reunification
- for 19, unsuccessful reunification attempts
29Reducing time in out-of-home care
- One of the clear intentions of the community
partnership for the welfare and protection of
children is to reduce the need for out-of-home
care - the development of strategies requires all
relevant services to work collaboratively to help
keep children at risk out of care. - Investment in additional support services to
divert children from care and reduce time spent
in care. - Specific proposals put forward in Public
Parenting - e.g., greater use of family group conferencing,
particularly effective with Indigenous families.
30Focus on permanency
- Not all out-of-home should be avoided
- The defining characteristic for children for whom
permanent care or adoption should be considered
is that their parents lack the capacity to
protect them and ensure their well-being, even
with the provision of intensive services and
support - for these children, more should be done, and done
earlier, to provide them with the opportunity to
live in and be part of a family.
31Appropriateness of directions for Indigenous
families
- The strategies of the community partnership
emphasise - working respectfully with parents and children
within their communities - helping families earlier
- broadening responsibility for child protection
- focusing on child welfare and family services and
support - working with parents, and the communitys, own
capacity and desire to self-regulate.
32But appropriateness cannot be assumed
- There are serious and entrenched child protection
concerns in Indigenous communities. - The issues are so important and challenging that
it is not possible to adequately address them as
part of report - they demand further examination, led by
consultation with Indigenous communities and
organisations.
33Achieving change
- A reconceptualisation of child protection as the
basis for reform - with the possibility of incremental strategies
towards its accomplishment. - Incremental strategies are important for two
reasons - significant implications for practice
- need for significant additional resources and
funding.
34Concluding hope
- Reform will be based upon advances in our
knowledge about child development and welfare,
and the experiences that hinder or enhance it.