Poverty, Inequality and Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Poverty, Inequality and Development

Description:

Problems arising from Inequality. Field's Stylized Development Typologies ... for the hypothesized relationship point to the nature of structural change. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2816
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: nataly2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Poverty, Inequality and Development


1
Poverty, Inequality and Development Todaro
Chapter 5 Part II
2
Overview
  • Problems arising from Inequality
  • Fields Stylized Development Typologies
  • Kuznets Inverted-U Hypothesis
  • Growth and Inequality
  • Extent of Absolute Poverty

3
Problems Arising from Inequality
  • Why should relative poverty be a concern?
  • Measures of inequality among the poor
  • Extreme Inequality results in
  • Economic Inefficiency
  • Social Instability and Conflict
  • Most of us as a part of our value system, view
    inequality as unfair.

4
Welfare Function
  • W Social Welfare
  • Y National Income
  • I degree of inequality
  • P degree of absolute poverty

5
Fields Stylized Development Typologies
  • Classifications of cases of dualistic development
    by common characteristics
  • Modern-Sector Enlargement Growth
  • Modern-Sector Enrichment Growth
  • Traditional-Sector Enrichment Growth
  • Certain policies may cause inequality to increase
    initially but may make everyone better off and
    reduce inequality in the long-run.

6
Kuznets Inverted-U Hypothesis
  • The hypothesis states that in early stages of
    growth, inequality will increase only to fall at
    later stages, leading to an inverted-U shaped
    relationship between per capita national income
    and measures of inequality.
  • Explanations for the hypothesized relationship
    point to the nature of structural change.
  • The validity of the relationship remains an
    empirical question. There is significant evidence
    to suggest that increases in per capita income
    does not have to paired with worsening inequality.

7
  • Per capita income does not appear to be highly
    correlated with any of the three inequality
    measures for the set of LDCs that we have
    considered.
  • Latin America Effect the observed inverted-U
    relationship may be attributed to the social and
    political history of Latin American countries
    which while being middle-income countries have
    the highest average level of inequality in the
    world.
  • For many countries there is no particular
    tendency for inequality to change much in the
    process of economic development.

8
Growth and Inequality
  • There is no obvious relationship between economic
    growth rates and measures of inequality.
  • Who participates often determines whether growth
    leads to a reduction or increase in inequality.

9
Extent of Absolute Poverty
  • Although the total number of the worlds
    population living in absolute poverty (global
    headcount) has increased over the last 20years,
    the percentage of the population living in
    absolute poverty (global headcount ratio) has
    fallen, despite rapid population growth.
  • Much of the improvement has occured in the
    developing world

10
Growth and Poverty
  • The traditional thinking was that efforts
    expended towards reducing poverty would slow down
    growth rates and that countries with lower
    inequality would experience slower growth rates.
  • Reductions in poverty need not come at the
    expense of high economic growth. We can look at
    China a country that has experienced the
    highest growth rates in the past 20 years and the
    most dramatic reduction in absolute poverty.

11
  • Widespread poverty actually retards growth
  • The developing world elite, unlike their
    developed counterparts have lower savings rates
    and often invest in foreign assets.
  • Extreme poverty leads to poor health, nutrition
    and education which results in low productivity
    and slower growth
  • Increasing the income of the poor increases
    demand for domestic products.
  • Reduction in mass poverty can act as a powerful
    incentive to participate in the development
    process, while growing income disparities and
    absolute poverty can have the opposite effect.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com