INSTALLATION FAA

1
INSTALLATION FAA COL Patrick Egan ACSIM
Plans and Operations PRESENTATION TO BPC 25
APR 2000
2
WHAT INSTALLATIONS DOBASOPS
Health Services
Provost Marshal
Acquisition
Command and Staff
Resource Management
9 major service areas 38 functions 95 services
Engineering
Health Services were not evaluated.
Logistics
Operations
Information Technology
Personnel and Community
3
END STATE

• Reviewed 7871 spaces
• Identified 3834 spaces to move to TOE ( 49)
• Issues
• Buyback
• Timing
• Successes
• MACOM Buy-in
• More consistency in military make up of
  installations

4
TIMING IS EVERYTHING

• 2d 3d Order Costs
• PCS
• Training
• Incentives

A-76 1500 Spaces
Buyback Costs 55K DAC 84K CME
FAA 3834 spaces
With Funding 2334 (?)
A-76 1500
- GIN - Savings ?
Now 3rd Qtr, FY 01 POM 3rd Qtr, FY 02
5
INSTALLATION FAA
RISK Low Moderate High Extreme
Category ENGINEERING
Mil to TOE
Retain
Issues
Risk
Cost
Impact /-
Functional Group
Eng Plt - USMA (39) Alaska FE (30)

• Facilities Maintenance/ Management
• Housing Management
• Real Property Management

LOW
69
Cadet Trng Ceremonial supportFacility
degradation may not be able to Civilianize/Contrac
t
0 Mil
5.8M

Easily contractedNo reqmt for Mil
LOW
16
1.4M
0 Mil
None
Removes military DPW from all installations
LOW
50
4.2M

Easily contractible civilianized xfer to Reserves
1 Mil
6
INSTALLATION FAA
RISK Low Moderate High Extreme
Category ENGINEERING
Mil to TOE
Retain
Issues
Risk
Cost
Impact /-
Functional Group
0
0
None

• Other Engineering Services
• Environmental Services
• Emergency Services

0 Mil
LOW
0 Mil
0
None
0
LOW

Retains military FF
0
0
118 Mil
LOW

total 135
7
RECOMMENDATIONS

• INITIATIVE
• A National Contract for such things as
• Information Management
• CIF
• Food Service
• Substance Abuse
• Internal Review
• Tactical Feeding

• RECOMMENDATION
• ACSIM ICW ASA(ALT) pursues now to implement NLT
  FY 02

8
RECOMMENDATIONS

• INITIATIVE
• Seek legislative/regulatory relief to eliminate
  constraints
• Davis-Bacon
• Service Contract Act
• Brooks Act
• Library closures
• DOD firefighters and police
• Set QOL standards at DOD vice Service Level

• RECOMMENDATION
• ACSIM ICW with OCLL pursue for submission in PB
  02
• DA (ACSIM lead) continue pursuing through OSD for
  implementation in FY 02

9
RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont)

• INITIATIVE
• Raise cap of credit card for retail supply
• Regionalize contracting
• Consolidate like programs TAQ, APIC, ACOE

• RECOMMENDATION
• ASA(ALT) staff lead raise to 250K at
  installation level NOW!!!
• ASA (ALT) pursue now
• Assign all to ACSIM now

10
RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont)

• INITIATIVE
• Develop information Super Centers that
  consolidate personnel (DEERS, ID cards, vehicle
  registration, commercial solicitation license,
  etc.), security and logistics information make
  use of smart cardskiosks

• RECOMMENDATION
• DISC4/ACSIM lead proponent FY 04 implementation

11
RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont)

• INITIATIVE
• Explore use of Reserve Component support, e.g.,
• servicing retirees, etc.

• RECOMMENDATION
• DA/MACOMs continue to leverage Reserves in
  installation management

12
DOCUMENTATION ALTERNATIVES
1
2
Stay with current TDA

• Develop Templates, e.g.
• Notional Garrison - CONUS
• Depot/Instl - AMC
• ASG - EUSA / USAREUR
• VCSA GUIDANCE - FLAT
• STRUCTURE - NOT STATUS QUO

FOLLOW-ON FAA
13
WAY AHEAD

• Created Installation Management Steering
  Committee 13 Mar 00 Future agenda items
• Analysis of structure/division of labor at HQDA,
  MACOM and installations
• Develop approach/BPR for MWR strategic sourcing
  initiatives
• Develop installation documentation templates for
  CENDOC
• Develop Army installation strategic plan
• Central management of installations under
• 3-Star leadership, DCSIM
• End state 4-Star Board of Directors similar to
  MWR BOD

14
Way Ahead for Army Base Operations Support

• COL Patrick Egan
• ACSIM
• Plans and Operations

15
Managing Army Base Operations Support Is A
Complex Business
Functional Proponents
DCSPER, DCSLOG, DCSOPS, ACSIM, . . .
How are we tackling this complex problem?
16
Adopted Notion that ConnectsResourcing with
Outcomes

• Developed ISR Services
• Service Performance Standards (SPS)
• Red-Amber-Green Service ratings C-1 thru C-4
  status
• Categorized funding
• Sustainment - maintaining SPSs at current level
  of effort and quality but not less than C-3 over
  all
• Improvement - maintaining level of effort while
  improving quality, maintaining quality while
  increasing level of effort, or improving both
• Established an approach to funding
• Program for sustainment - Service Performance
  Standards
• Program to improve selected base operations
  support services

17
Vision for the Proposed Future
Current Practice
Proposed Future
Funding Process

• Fully fund Sustainment
• Select Services for focused improvement

• Fair Share

• Commanders Choice on Executing Sustainment
• Performance Feedback thru ISR
• Services are C-2 by Improving selected services
  to C-1

• Commanders Choice on Sustainment and or
  improvements

• SSC Requirements Based

• of Historical Cost Based

18
ACSIM Base Operations Support Strategy
Quality
Sustainment
Strategic Sourcing
Quantity
BPR
SSC
COST FUNCTION InstallationFt Campell Service
Laundry Dry Cleaning Formulay
a bx q
STANDARD SERVICE COST Quantity-Quality Relations
Incremental improvements
High Quality
Cost
a q
Low Quality
b
a
y Resources Required a Fixed Costs b
Variable Unit Cost x Quantity ( Attribute) q
Quality Factor
1
x Quantity
19
Meeting the Intent of theGovernment Performance
and Results Act

• Set acceptable range of performance
• Set expected level of performance
• Determine should cost for expected level of
  performance
• Measure cost and level of performance to deliver
• Measure cost to do

s
STANDARDS
Resources
Information
SSC
ISR III SBC
ABC
20
ANALYTICAL TOOLS
SBC
HOW MUCH DID IT COST?
SBC DOLLARS
AIM-HI/SSC
PACING MEASURE PERFORMANCE AGAINST SPS
ISR
HOW MUCH SHOULD IT COST AT C-1?
HOW MUCH DID WE DO? HOW WELL DID WE DO IT?
21
Ft. Shelton - Future RequirementsStandard
Service Costing
MACOM BASOPS Req () FYxx

Installation Standard Service Cost ()
Installation A
Installation B
Installation N
95 services
ISR Part III
SBC
22
Essential Service Requirements (ESR)
Program Requirement (from AIM-HI / SSC)
C-4
Reported Performance Status (proportion from ISR,
by Service)
C-4
Program Requirement/Costs
C-3
C-3
C-3
C-2
Total Reported Costs(from SBC)
C-4
C-4
C-2
C-1
C-3
C-2
C-1
C-3
C-3
C-1
C-1
C-1
C-2
C-1
Command Staff
Personnel Community
Information Technology
Operations
Logistics
Engineering
Acquisition
Resource Management
Major Service Area
Overall ISR Status Takes into account
performance against SPS and SSC
23
Benefits of the Process

• Auditable - approved data sources with
  installation input
• Replicatable
• Provides a consistent set of metrics for
  communication with MACOMs, ARSTAF, OSD
• Standard Service Costing will enhance
  articulation of requirementslink funding to
  service performance (achievement of results)