Occam - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Occam

Description:

Albert Einstein. Neils Bohr. Wolfgang Pauli. John von Neumann ... next it is an aether: under Einstein's influence it becomes curved; the quantum ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: martins3
Category:
Tags: albert | einstein | occam

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Occam


1
  • Occams Razor as often misstated
  • The simplest explanation is the best
  • Full statement of Occams Razor
  • The simplest explanation that accounts for all
    the data is the best

2
  • Simplicity is a pagan aesthetic ideal.
  • As Alfred North Whitehead said,
  • Seek simplicity, and distrust it.

3
  • What we may be facing
  • There is no adequate defense,except
    stupidity,against the impact of a new idea.
  • -- Percy Bridgman

4
  • Paracelsus vs. Aristotle
  • Paracelsus tore up his students work that were
    based on Aristotle, insisting they do actual
    experiments instead of merely regurgitating
    Aristotle.
  • Philippus Theophrastus Aureolus Bombastus von
    Hohenheim (1493-1541)

5
  • Who are the new Aristotles?
  • Albert Einstein
  • Neils Bohr Wolfgang Pauli
  • John von Neumannet al.

6
  • Have any of these new Aristotles retarded the
    advance of scientific knowledge?
  • Albert Einstein
  • Neils Bohr Wolfgang Pauli
  • John von Neumann

7
  • Have any of these new Aristotles retarded the
    advance of scientific knowledge?
  • Albert Einstein
  • Neils Bohr Wolfgang Pauli
  • John von Neumann

8
  • Louis de Broglie set aside his pilot-wave theory
    because Wolfgang Pauli supposedly blew holes in
    it, while von Neumanns proof that quantum
    mechanics cannot accommodate hidden variables was
    revered for decades.

9
  • Had no one questioned the authority of Pauli and
    von Neumann, we would never know today that their
    objections were unsound, being sustained solely
    by the researchers well-respected credentials.

10
  • Earths annual orbital motion around sun in
    heliocentric model 30,000 meters/second
  • Corresponding acceleration
  • 0.006 meters per second per second

11
  • Earths daily rotation at equator heliocentric
    model 463 meters/second
  • Corresponding acceleration
  • 0.03365 meters per second per second

12
V V2/R
Annual orbitaround Sun 30,000 m/s 0.006 m/s2
Daily rotationon axis 463 m/s 0.03365 m/s2
Ratio of annual to daily value 64.8 0.178
13
  • The 64,000 question
  • What is
  • Aether Entrainment?

14
  • Aether entrainment proposes that the aether is
    not detectable at the Earths surface because it
    is dragged (entrained) with the Earth.

15
  • Aether theorists (those that believe in most
    forms of aether) who are NOT geocentrists HAVE to
    have an entrainment model to account for the data!

16
  • Lets look at that chart again and predict where
    aether entrainment has to occur for aether models
    to match the observational data

17
V V2/R
Annual orbitaround Sun 30,000 m/s 0.006 m/s2
Daily rotationon axis 463 m/s 0.03365 m/s2
Ratio of annual to daily value 64.8 0.178
18
V V2/R
Annual orbitaround Sun 30,000 m/s 0.006 m/s2
Daily rotationon axis 463 m/s 0.03365 m/s2
Ratio of annual to daily value 64.8 0.178
19
V V2/R
Annual orbitaround Sun 30,000 m/s 0.006 m/s2
Daily rotationon axis 463 m/s 0.03365 m/s2
Ratio of annual to daily value 64.8 0.178
20
  • The aether guys,like Lucy,have got an awfullot
    of splainin to do.The disproportions dont
    add up.

21
  • Classical aether theorists could become the
    closest compatriots of geocentrists. The barrier
    to this union is their commitment to unfounded,
    unobservedaether entrainment.

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
There should be a gradient!
28
There should be a gradient!
But where is it?
29
Without a gradient, aether entrainment ends up
with superluminal entrainment!
30
Without a gradient, aether entrainment entails
superluminal entrainment!
Entrainment the 800-lb Gorilla in the living room
31
  • If aether theorists cannot
  • Account for disproportion
  • (2) Measure a gradient
  • they must either abandonsuch an aether OR
  • ADOPT GEOCENTRICITY!

32
  • Coulson notes that the story of physics is simply
    full of changed models for space. At one period
    space is a plenum, full of vortices or their
    equivalent at a later time it is empty then it
    is the seat of electric and magnetic forces next
    it is an aether under Einsteins influence it
    becomes curved the quantum theoreticians now
    load it full with zero-point vibrations and
    oscillators. sic
  • Edgar Horsfield. Aspects of scientific method in
    the natural sciences physics. Am. J. Phys.
    529, 1984 804-814, p. 811.

33
  • Physics is groping for a defensible model of
    space. As the previous quote shows, space has
    been theoretically imbued with a litany of
    attributes.
  • Geocentrists need to get their model of space
    into the marketplace of ideas!

34
  • Selbrede model of the firmament
  • LeSage with a twist

35
  • LeSages ultramundane corpuscules are treated as
    analogous to particles in an ideal gas.

36
(No Transcript)
37
Mean free path l is much larger than corpuscles.
38
In Selbrede model, mean free path l is less than
the radius of the individual corpuscles.
Density of this firmament is the Planck Density.
Temperature is the Planck Temperature.
39
So whats wrong with Wheelers spacetime foam?
On Planck-length scales spacetime fluctuates
mechanically so randomly and violently that it
develops all kinds of microscopic topological
structures, such as wormholes. Spherically
symmetric Minkowski wormholes provide a very
simple model of a mode of topological fluctuation
in Lorentzian spacetime foam, and suggest a mode
unstable against growth to macroscopic size. the
wholehas no stable bound quantum states, and
will eventually grow to large size by quantum
diffusion. -- Ian Redmount Wai-mo Suen. Is
quantum spacetime foam unstable? Physical Review
D 476, 1993 R2163-R2167.
40
So whats wrong with Wheelers spacetime foam?
The virtual particle model is unstable against
decay into an enormous menagerie of topological
monstrosities that would long ago have been
detected. REAL particles, NOT virtual particles,
are at the heart of the medium wrongly labeled
spacetime foam. This is the maximon fluid of
M. Markov that functions as a quasi-isotropic
space reported in The Very Early Universe,
edited by Hawking, Gibbon Syklos (1983).
41
The advantages of ultradense aethers
They confound the barycentric objection to
geocentricity. Such models enable superluminal
rotation. Such models undergird superluminal
interactions and so-called quantum nonlocality
results (serving as a deterministic physical
basis for the subquantum domain) Such models
have important implications for gravitation and
electrodynamics research. Current state
interpretation of the Planck Density.
42
Where geocentrists find themselves.
At the cross-currents of contemporary quantum and
subquantum physics. Solutions to gravitational
anomalies (via LeSage model) Taking seriously
the divine creation of the firmament, versus
paying the doctrine mere lip service. Thinking
Gods thoughts after Him But better than
Kepler did, to whom the quote is attributed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com