Topic 22: Controversy over phone mast plans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Topic 22: Controversy over phone mast plans

Description:

Cell phone towers emit electromagnetic ... 45% of US citizens use Cell phones ... Costs non-users of cell phones may be exposed to minimal RF non-ionizing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: tylerh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Topic 22: Controversy over phone mast plans


1
Topic 22 Controversy over phone mast plans
  • Tyler Hinkle
  • Petia Zamfirova

2
Background
  • A mobile phone company (Vodafone) wants to
    relocate a tower near two area schools
  • The county authority breaks policy of restricting
    cell towers within 250 meters of a school and
    wants to allow it saying there is no choice
  • The original tower was even closer to one of the
    schools and its lease is ending and has to be
    relocated due to highway construction

3
Background continued
  • The County Authority will meet to discuss denial
    of relocation request
  • Cell phone towers emit electromagnetic
    Radio-Frequency (RF) fields
  • A form of electromagnetic radiation
  • Lack of substantial proven scientific evidence of
    cell phone RF emissions on health

4
Ethical Dilemma
  • Debate Question Given that danger from cellular
    telephone towers has never been proven
    scientifically, would it be ethical for the
    county officials to deny Vodafone its tower
    location request only because of the public
    perception that the towers could be dangerous?
  • Petia Yes, it would be ethical to deny the
    request
  • Tyler No, it would NOT be ethical to deny the
    request

5
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • NSPE Code of Ethics
  • First Fundamental Canon
  • Engineers shall hold paramount the safety,
    health, and welfare of the public
  • National Institute of Environmental Health
    Sciences identified RF fields as possible human
    carcinogens

6
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Health Effects Linked to Cellular Telephone RF
    Fields from Towers according to the National
    Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
    (NIEHS)
  • Increased Cancer Cell Growth
  • More Childhood Leukemia
  • Headaches
  • Memory Loss
  • Increased Blood Pressure
  • Changes in Sleep Patterns
  • Neurological Changes

7
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • NSPE Code of Ethics Section III-2
  • Engineers shall at all times strive to serve the
    public interest
  • The public interest is in the use of cellular
    service
  • 140 Millions US users and 1.4 Billion users
    worldwide
  • Increases by 1 Million users each month in US
  • 25 increase expected by 2007

8
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • No proven risk from cellular RF field
    transmission
  • The Cellular Telecommunications Internet
    Association (CTIA) - "There's nothing in the
    science to suggest there are any adverse health
    effects with cell phones," says Jo-Anne Basile,
    vice president for external and industry
    relations for the CTIA.

9
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Cell towers do emit electro magnetic and radio
    wave radiation in small amounts
  • RF radiation has the ability to heat human
    tissue much in the ways microwaves do
  • ADDITIVE - Prolonged exposure even at small
    amounts is enough to cause damage risk increases
    with duration
  • RF exposure is proven to cause DNA mutation
    (NIEHS)

10
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Any level of emitted RF radiation from towers is
    minimal
  • DNA mutation exists but is far less severe than
    normal sun exposure Immune system repairs
    damage using T4 endonuclease enzymes
  • 3rd degree Sun-Burn 200x more severe than RF
    levels at that of cellular technology according
    to the Cellular Telecommunications Internet
    Association
  • It would be unethical to deny the request when RF
    exposure is safer than sunlight

11
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Vodafone Code of Ethics
  • 1.3 Promote compliance with applicable
    governmental laws, rules, and regulations
  • Code Ensure that Cell Company Complies with
  • FCC regulations for maximum Radio Frequency
    transmission levels
  • FDA radiation health standards The available
    scientific evidence does not demonstrate any
    health effect associated with the use of cell
    phones.
  • IEEE Standards
  • Laws and regulations are being
  • met, RF levels of towers are safe
  • according to government standards

12
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Regulations not good enough
  • No Clear Cutoff Levels
  • Not Proven Safe
  • Environmental Protection Agency rejects IEEE
    standards for RF emissions

13
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Code of
    Ethics
  • 2.6 Honor Contracts, Agreements, and assigned
    responsibilities
  • Customers of cellular telephone companies signed
    contracts ensuring them service. Multiple cell
    towers at varying locations are required to
    ensure signals for service.

14
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Code of
    Ethics
  • 1.1 Contribute to society and human well-being
  • 1.2 Avoid Harm to Others
  • "People can vary in their susceptibility to
    environmental hazards," the report by the
    Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones states.
    "We conclude therefore that it is not possible to
    say that exposure to RF radiation, even at levels
    below national guidelines, is totally without
    potential adverse health effects, and that the
    gaps in knowledge are sufficient to justify a
    precautionary approach."

15
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Non-ionizing radiation
  • Power level similar to a CB radio
  • Utilitarian View
  • Cell towers serve the greatest good by allowing
    service to a far greater number of people than
    those averse to cell phone use
  • 45 of US citizens use Cell phones
  • No Proven Evidence that Cell Towers are the Cause
    of any Health Effects

16
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Respect for Persons Everybody treated as moral
    agents
  • Rights-
  • Right to life
  • Right to bodily integrity
  • Right to free action
  • Self-Defeating Criterion
  • What if all cell phone companies put towers near
    schools?
  • Remember that prolonged exposure increases risk,
    every student would have constant exposure for at
    least 12 years.
  • The Golden Rule
  • Cell phone companies pay for the use of land for
    a tower. Would you put a cell phone tower on
    your house if they offered you money?

17
It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
  • Self-Defeating Criterion
  • What if all cell phone companies were denied
    tower locations near schools?
  • Cost-Benefit Utilitarian Approach
  • Costs non-users of cell phones may be exposed
    to minimal RF non-ionizing radiation as much as
    users
  • Isolated cases of sickness supposedly linked to
    exposure
  • Benefits Seamless cell phone signals and higher
    usage for a growing number of users approaching
    150 million in the US alone
  • Emergencies - 1/3 of all 911 calls are from cell
    phones

18
It would be ethical to deny the tower request
  • STC (Society of Telecommunications Consultants)
    Code of Ethics
  • Every member has the professional responsibility
    of adhering to generally accepted standards of
    accuracy, truth, and good taste at all times
  • Every member has the professional responsibility
    of fair dealing toward the member's clients, past
    and present, fellow members, and the general
    public.
  • Good Taste and fair dealing of the general
    public includes not putting the public in harms
    way

19
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com