Title: Topic 22: Controversy over phone mast plans
1Topic 22 Controversy over phone mast plans
- Tyler Hinkle
- Petia Zamfirova
2Background
- A mobile phone company (Vodafone) wants to
relocate a tower near two area schools
- The county authority breaks policy of restricting
cell towers within 250 meters of a school and
wants to allow it saying there is no choice
- The original tower was even closer to one of the
schools and its lease is ending and has to be
relocated due to highway construction
3Background continued
- The County Authority will meet to discuss denial
of relocation request
- Cell phone towers emit electromagnetic
Radio-Frequency (RF) fields
- A form of electromagnetic radiation
- Lack of substantial proven scientific evidence of
cell phone RF emissions on health
4Ethical Dilemma
- Debate Question Given that danger from cellular
telephone towers has never been proven
scientifically, would it be ethical for the
county officials to deny Vodafone its tower
location request only because of the public
perception that the towers could be dangerous? - Petia Yes, it would be ethical to deny the
request
- Tyler No, it would NOT be ethical to deny the
request
5It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- NSPE Code of Ethics
- First Fundamental Canon
- Engineers shall hold paramount the safety,
health, and welfare of the public
- National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences identified RF fields as possible human
carcinogens
6It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- Health Effects Linked to Cellular Telephone RF
Fields from Towers according to the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS) - Increased Cancer Cell Growth
- More Childhood Leukemia
- Headaches
- Memory Loss
- Increased Blood Pressure
- Changes in Sleep Patterns
- Neurological Changes
7It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- NSPE Code of Ethics Section III-2
- Engineers shall at all times strive to serve the
public interest
- The public interest is in the use of cellular
service
- 140 Millions US users and 1.4 Billion users
worldwide
- Increases by 1 Million users each month in US
- 25 increase expected by 2007
8It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- No proven risk from cellular RF field
transmission
- The Cellular Telecommunications Internet
Association (CTIA) - "There's nothing in the
science to suggest there are any adverse health
effects with cell phones," says Jo-Anne Basile,
vice president for external and industry
relations for the CTIA.
9It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- Cell towers do emit electro magnetic and radio
wave radiation in small amounts
- RF radiation has the ability to heat human
tissue much in the ways microwaves do
- ADDITIVE - Prolonged exposure even at small
amounts is enough to cause damage risk increases
with duration
- RF exposure is proven to cause DNA mutation
(NIEHS)
10It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- Any level of emitted RF radiation from towers is
minimal
- DNA mutation exists but is far less severe than
normal sun exposure Immune system repairs
damage using T4 endonuclease enzymes
- 3rd degree Sun-Burn 200x more severe than RF
levels at that of cellular technology according
to the Cellular Telecommunications Internet
Association - It would be unethical to deny the request when RF
exposure is safer than sunlight
11It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- Vodafone Code of Ethics
- 1.3 Promote compliance with applicable
governmental laws, rules, and regulations
- Code Ensure that Cell Company Complies with
- FCC regulations for maximum Radio Frequency
transmission levels
- FDA radiation health standards The available
scientific evidence does not demonstrate any
health effect associated with the use of cell
phones. - IEEE Standards
- Laws and regulations are being
- met, RF levels of towers are safe
- according to government standards
12It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- Regulations not good enough
- No Clear Cutoff Levels
- Not Proven Safe
- Environmental Protection Agency rejects IEEE
standards for RF emissions
13It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Code of
Ethics
- 2.6 Honor Contracts, Agreements, and assigned
responsibilities
- Customers of cellular telephone companies signed
contracts ensuring them service. Multiple cell
towers at varying locations are required to
ensure signals for service.
14It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Code of
Ethics
- 1.1 Contribute to society and human well-being
- 1.2 Avoid Harm to Others
- "People can vary in their susceptibility to
environmental hazards," the report by the
Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones states.
"We conclude therefore that it is not possible to
say that exposure to RF radiation, even at levels
below national guidelines, is totally without
potential adverse health effects, and that the
gaps in knowledge are sufficient to justify a
precautionary approach."
15It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- Non-ionizing radiation
- Power level similar to a CB radio
- Utilitarian View
- Cell towers serve the greatest good by allowing
service to a far greater number of people than
those averse to cell phone use
- 45 of US citizens use Cell phones
- No Proven Evidence that Cell Towers are the Cause
of any Health Effects
16It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- Respect for Persons Everybody treated as moral
agents
- Rights-
- Right to life
- Right to bodily integrity
- Right to free action
- Self-Defeating Criterion
- What if all cell phone companies put towers near
schools?
- Remember that prolonged exposure increases risk,
every student would have constant exposure for at
least 12 years.
- The Golden Rule
- Cell phone companies pay for the use of land for
a tower. Would you put a cell phone tower on
your house if they offered you money?
17It would NOT be ethical to deny the tower request
- Self-Defeating Criterion
- What if all cell phone companies were denied
tower locations near schools?
- Cost-Benefit Utilitarian Approach
- Costs non-users of cell phones may be exposed
to minimal RF non-ionizing radiation as much as
users
- Isolated cases of sickness supposedly linked to
exposure
- Benefits Seamless cell phone signals and higher
usage for a growing number of users approaching
150 million in the US alone
- Emergencies - 1/3 of all 911 calls are from cell
phones
18It would be ethical to deny the tower request
- STC (Society of Telecommunications Consultants)
Code of Ethics
- Every member has the professional responsibility
of adhering to generally accepted standards of
accuracy, truth, and good taste at all times
- Every member has the professional responsibility
of fair dealing toward the member's clients, past
and present, fellow members, and the general
public. - Good Taste and fair dealing of the general
public includes not putting the public in harms
way
19Questions?