FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES

Description:

Structure is tied to key activities within the business ... Functional myopia often works against entrepreneurship, against adapting to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:5231
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: busin7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES


1
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES
A. The building blocks of a typical
organization structure
General Manager
Engineering
Manufacturing
Marketing
Finance and Accounting
Personnel
Research and Development
B. The building blocks of a process-oriented
functional structure
General Manager
Foundry and Castings
Milling and Grinding
Screw Machining
Customer Service
Loading and Shipping
Billing and Accounting
Inspection
Finishing and Heat Treating
2
ADVANTAGES OF A FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE
  • Structure is tied to key activities within the
    business
  • Enhances operating efficiency where tasks are
    routine and repetitive
  • Preserves centralized control of strategic
    results
  • Allows benefits of specialization and
    learning/experience curve effects to be fully
    exploited
  • Promotes high emphasis on craftsmanship and
    professional standards
  • Well suited to developing distinctive
    competencies in one or more functional areas
  • Simplifies training of management specialists

Environment Best in low uncertainty,
stable Size Best for small to medium Goals/Strate
gy Internal efficiency technical specialization
3
DISADVANTAGES OF A FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE
  • Forces profit responsibility to the top.
  • May lead to uneconomically small units or under
    utilization of specialized facilities and
    manpower.
  • Functional myopia often works against
    entrepreneurship, against adapting to change, and
    against attempts to restructure.
  • Limits development of general managers.
  • Functional specialists often attach more
    importance to whats best for the functional area
    than to whats best for the whole business.
  • Poses problems of functional coordination.
  • Can lead to interfunctional rivalry, conflict,
    and empire building.
  • May promote overspecialization and narrow
    management viewpoints.

4
A DECENTRALIZED BUSINESS/PRODUCT TYPE OF
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Chief Executive Officer
Vice President, Administration
Vice President, Corporate Support Services
Finance
Engineering Services
Accounting
Planning
Research Development
Personnel
Marketing Services
Legal Affairs
Public Relations
Manufacturing Services
General Manager Business Division B
General Manager Business Division C
General Manager Business Division A
Quality Control
Quality Control
Quality Control
Personnel
Personnel
Personnel
Purchasing
Purchasing
Purchasing
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Marketing
Marketing
Marketing
5
ADVANTAGES OF BUSINESS/PRODUCT TYPE STRUCTURE
  • Puts responsibility for business strategy in
    closer proximity to each businesss unique
    environment
  • Offers logical and workable means of
    decentralizing responsibility and delegating
    authority in diversified organizations
  • Allows critical tasks and specialization to be
    organized to fit business strategy
  • Frees CEO to handle corporate strategy issues
  • Creates clear profit/loss accountability

Environment Moderate to high uncertainty,
changing Size Moderate to very
large Goals/Strategy Customer responsiveness
external effectiveness
6
DISADVANTAGES OF BUSINESS/PRODUCT TYPE STRUCTURE
  • Leads to proliferation of staff functions, policy
    inconsistencies between divisions, and problems
    of coordination of divisional operations
  • May lead to excessive divisional rivalry for
    corporate resources and attention
  • Business/division autonomy works against
    achieving coordination of related activities in
    different business units
  • Poses a problem of how much authority to
    centralize and how much to decentralize
  • Raises issue of how to allocate corporate level
    overhead

7
A MATRIX ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
General Manager
Heads of Functional Departments - RD,
Engineering, Manufacturing, Marketing, Finance,
Personnel
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Managers of Business Units, Venture Teams,
Product Lines, Geographic Areas, and/or Projects.
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
Functional Specialists
(Arrows indicate reporting channels)
8
ADVANTAGES OF A MATRIX STRUCTURE
  • Promotes making trade-off decisions on the basis
    of whats best for the organization as a whole.
  • Creates checks and balances among competing
    viewpoints
  • Permits more attention to each dimension of
    strategic priority
  • Facilitates simultaneous pursuit of different
    types of strategic initiatives
  • Encourages cooperation, consensus building,
    conflict resolution, and coordination of related
    activities

Environment High uncertainty Size Small to
moderate Goals/Strategy Flexibility
specialization
9
DISADVANTGES OF A MATRIX STRUCTURE
  • It is hard to move quickly and decisively without
    getting clearance from many other people
  • Promotes an organizational bureaucracy and
    hamstrings creative entrepreneurship
  • Violation of the scalar chain principle of one
    manager
  • Very complex to manage
  • Hard to maintain balance between the two lines
    of authority
  • So much shared authority can result in a
    transactions logjam and disproportionate amounts
    of time being spent on communications
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com