2006 Lines of Business LoB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

2006 Lines of Business LoB

Description:

Managing Partner: Thomas Brady, GSA. OMB IEE E-Gov Portfolio ... LoB Task Force WGs and team leads actively engaged. Effectively assess business processes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: omb1
Category:
Tags: lob | brady | business | engaged | lines

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2006 Lines of Business LoB


1
  • 2006 Lines of Business (LoB)
  • Presentation for ITAA
  • May 17, 2006

2
Lines of Business Opportunities
OMB and the LoB Task Forces are focused on
business-driven, common solutions developed
through architectural processes.

Common Solutions A business process and/or
technology based shared service made available to
government agencies. Business Driven (vs.
Technology Driven) Solutions address distinct
business improvements that directly impact LoB
performance goals. Developed Through
Architectural Processes Solutions are developed
through a set of common and repeatable processes
and tools.
  • The following LoBs are being
  • undertaken in FY 2006
  • Budget Formulation
  • and Execution
  • IT Infrastructure
  • Optimization
  • Geospatial

3
Managing Partners and OMB Leads
  • LoB Executive Sponsors
  • OMB Office of E-Gov Karen Evans
  • OMB Office of Budget Systems Beth Robinson
  • LoB Program Manager Von Harrison, GSA
  • IT Infrastructure LoB
  • Managing Partner Thomas Brady, GSA
  • OMB IEE E-Gov Portfolio Manager Jeff Koch
  • Geospatial LoB
  • Managing Partner Ivan DeLoatch , DOI
  • OMB G2G E-Gov Portfolio Manager Stacie Boyd
  • Budget Formulation and Execution LoB
  • Managing Partner Andy Schoenbach, Acting
  • OMB IEE E-Gov Portfolio Manager Jeff Koch
  • OMB Senior Advisor Wayne Upshaw
  • Chief Architect Dick Burk, OMB

4
High-Level Timeline

Kick Off Meeting 3/16/06
LoB Vision Plan Completed 3/28/06
Define/ Plan LoB
RFI Distributed4/6/06
RFI Responses Received Evaluated 5/5/06-5/15/06
Develop RFI
Proposed Common Solutions Draft
Architecture 6/9/06
Develop Common Solutions Target Architecture
Draft Solutions Architecture 5/26/06
Develop Business Case
Draft Joint Business Case due 6/9/06 Agency
Comments due 6-19
Final Joint Business Case Early Aug. 06
Monitor and Communicate LoB Progress/Status
5
Expected LoB Outcomes
The LoB Task Forces will identify common
solutions, develop a target architecture, and
develop a joint (interagency) business case by
August 2006.
6
Overview of the LOB Process
  • Task Force Staffing
  • Agencies dedicating staff 75 time commitment
  • LoB Task Force WGs and team leads actively
    engaged
  • Effectively assess business processes
  • RFI released 4/613/06. Responses from business,
    government, non-profits, and vendors received
    5/5/06
  • Concurrent review of agency data, processes and
    systems
  • Use VGO, agency reviews, RFI input to develop
    common solutions, CONOPS and target architectures
  • Efficient, effective, standardized, optimized,
    reduced cost
  • Develop FY 08 joint business cases (A-11
    compliant) agency review final submission to
    OMB 9/06
  • Potential procurements in FY07, 08

7
Cross-Agency InitiativeCONOPS
Definitional
Operational
Analysis
  • Definitional Deliverables
  • Business case
  • Due diligence checklist
  • LoB solution architecture
  • Complete LoB FTF update
  • Analysis Deliverables
  • Problem statement
  • Vision statement
  • Performance Goals
  • Reference architecture integrated to FTF
  • Preliminary baseline inventory
  • Request for information (RFI) - optional
  • Operational Deliverables
  • Service level agreements (SLAs)
  • Agency implementation plans
  • Updated LoB artifacts
  • Updated LoB FTF entry

8
LoB Vision Statements
Optimized State of being standardized,
interoperable, extensible and cost effective
9
IT Infrastructure Current State
  • IT infrastructure costs are rising at a rate
    faster than IT as a whole substantial savings
    are possible
  • Costs for FY06 were 19.9B and IT budgets will
    remain fairly static supporting
  • Telecommunications
  • Data Networks
  • Desktop/Seat Management
  • Data Centers
  • Help Desk
  • Need to address cost efficiencies and ROI,
    performance metrics, service levels,
    interoperability and collaboration, governance,
    standards, transition strategies, human capital

10
Geospatial Current State
  • Geospatial information supports many missions,
    including national security, law enforcement,
    health care, the environment, and natural
    resources conservation
  • Twenty Five Federal departments and agencies
    independently collect or produce geospatial
    information, or invest in potentially duplicative
    geospatial capabilities
  • Despite the prevalence of geospatial information,
    there continues to be room for improvement in the
    planning and coordination of geospatial
    activities and procurement at the Federal level

11
BFE Current State
  • Most agencies do not have automated budgeting
    systems to accomplish budgeting functions   
  • Depend on general-use office tools such as
    Microsoft Excel and Word
  • Some have database and integrating software
    (including GOTS) to automatically incorporate
    numbers in document production and interact with
    other agency applications
  • A few agencies have implemented elements of BFE
    systems that have significantly reduced workload,
    but no agency has a system with which it is
    totally satisfied. 
  • Only one agency has the capability to transmit
    data directly to OMB's MAX A-11 central budget
    system

12
BFE Current State (cont.)
  • OMB's MAX A-11 central budget system is based on
    an integrated relational database and uses
    web-based technologies to collect data from
    agencies.  
  • It includes thousands of automated business rules
    that dynamically evolve throughout the Budget
    process
  • The OMB MAX A-11 desktop client must be installed
    and periodically updated by agency users.
  • Increasingly restrictive agency LAN and
    workstation security policies are becoming a
    significant problem

13
RFI Responses
  • Asked practitioners of IT infrastructure,
    Geospatial data and Budgeting systems,
    components, and services to provide information
    of value for common solutions at the enterprise
    level for Federal agencies
  • Best practices, lessons learned, and attributes
    of effective management and decision-making
    processes
  • Architectural approaches that enable integration
    of diverse solutions and facilitate increased
    collaboration and secure data sharing
  • Received significant volume and quality of
    responses for each LoB

14
Wrap Up
  • LoB success requires public and private sector
    commitment
  • Responsiveness to RFI was valuable contribution
  • LoBs are prudent utilization of taxpayer
    resources and unprecedented opportunity
  • To refocus agency resources on core mission and
    citizen-centric services
  • Small investment for the potentially significant
    benefit
  • LoBs have and will likely result in business
    opportunities for private sector interests
  • Partnership can promote and advance technology,
    standard setting, service practices and
    governance infrastructure that contributes to
    success beyond public sector use

15
Contact Information
  • Von Harrison, LOB Program Manager
  • von.harrison_at_gsa.gov
  • Office 202 273-0721
  • Responses for Frequently Asked Questions will be
    posted under http//www.estrategy.gov and
    Related Links at
  • http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/c-6-9-ioi.html
  • http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/c-6-7-bfe.html
  • http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/c-6-8-glob.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com