Conducting Research 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Conducting Research 2

Description:

... population is the one upon which the results of the study will be generalized. ... External validity: the ability to generalize from the study results to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: HIS102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conducting Research 2


1
Conducting Research (2)
  • Dr. Rasha Salama
  • PhD. Community Medicine

2
Research
  • Research is the systematic collection, analysis
    and interpretation of data to answer a certain
    question or solve a problem
  • It is crucial to follow cascading scientific
    steps when conducting ones research

3
Steps of Scientific Research
no need for study
  • Selection of area
  • Selection of topic
  • Crude research question


  • no answer
  • Refined research question
  • Research hypothesis, goals and objectives
  • Study design
  • Population sampling
  • Variables confounding
    bias

answers found
Literature review
Ethical issues
4
1. Study Design
Descriptive studies
Analytical studies
Case report
Observational studies
Experimental studies
Case serial reports
Randomized Controlled Clinical trials
Case-control studies
Cohort studies
Randomized Controlled field trials
Cross-sectional studies
Non-randomized experiments
Prospective
Retrospective (historical)
Ecological studies
5
How could we select the best Study design ?
  • Purpose of the study
  • State of existing knowledge (in relation to study
    question)
  • Characteristics of the study variables
  • Latency
  • Feasibility

6
Purpose of the study
  • Study of etiology
  • Ecologic
  • Cross-sectional
  • Case-control
  • Cohort
  • Intervention
  • Study of therapy
  • Lab experiments
  • Clinical trials
  • Community intervention

7
State of existing knowledge (in relation to study
question)
  • New idea
  • Ecologic
  • Cross-sectional
  • New hypothesis
  • Cross-sectional
  • Case-control
  • Newly claimed association
  • Case-control replication, confirmation
  • Cohort stronger evidence towards causation
  • Confirmed association
  • Experiment/intervention to prove causation

8
Characteristics of the study variables
  • Very rare exposures case-control design is NOT
    suitable since it looks for exposure. A very
    large number of subjects is required.
  • Very rare disease cohort design is NOT suitable
    since it looks for outcome. Follow-up of a huge
    number is required.
  • Acute disease prevalence studies are not
    suitable
  • Risky exposures clinical trials are unethical
  • Unavailable data record-based studies are not
    suitable.

9
Latency
  • For diseases with very long latency, the costs of
    concurrent cohort studies or clinical trials are
    prohibitively high.

10
Feasibility
  • Time
  • Manpower
  • Equipment
  • Money

11
2. Population and Sampling
  • Sampling is the process of selection of a number
    of units from a defined study population.
  • The process of sampling involves
  • Identification of study population
  • Determination of sampling population
  • Definition of the sampling unit
  • Choice of sampling method
  • Estimation of the sample size

12
Identification of study population
  • The study or target population is the one upon
    which the results of the study will be
    generalized.
  • It is crucial that the study population is
    clearly defined, since it is the most important
    determinant of the sampling population

13
Determination of sampling population
  • The sampling population is the one from which the
    sample is drawn.
  • The definition of the sampling population by the
    investigator is governed by two factors
  • Feasibility reachable sampling population
  • External validity the ability to generalize from
    the study results to the target population.

14
Definition of the sampling unit
  • The definition of the sampling unit is done by
    setting
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Exclusion criteria
  • (exclusion criteria are not the opposite of
    inclusion criteria)

15
Choice of sampling method
  • Non probability sampling
  • Probability sampling

16
Non probability sampling
  • Types of non probability sampling
  • Convenience sampling
  • Quota sampling
  • Not recommended in medical research
  • It is by far the most biases sampling
    procedure as it is not random (not everyone in
    the population has an equal chance of being
    selected to participate in the study).

17
Probability sampling
  • There is a known non-zero probability of
    selection for each sampling unit
  • Types
  • Simple random sampling
  • Systematic random sampling
  • Stratified random sampling
  • Multi-stage random sampling
  • Cluster sampling
  • Multi-phase sampling

18
Simple random sample
  • In this method, all subject or elements have an
    equal probability of being selected. There are
    two major ways of conducting a random sample.
  • The first is to consult a random number table,
    and the second is to have the computer select a
    random sample.

19
Systematic random sample
  • A systematic sample is conducted by randomly
    selecting a first case on a list of the
    population and then proceeding every Nth case
    until your sample is selected. This is
    particularly useful if your list of the
    population is long.
  • For example, if your list was the phone book, it
    would be easiest to start at perhaps the 17th
    person, and then select every 50th person from
    that point on.

20
Stratified sample
  • In a stratified sample, we sample either
    proportionately or equally to represent various
    strata or subpopulations.
  • For example if our strata were cities in a
    country we would make sure and sample from each
    of the cities. If our strata were gender, we
    would sample both men and women.

21
Multistage sampling
Country
Provinces
Cities
Districts
Households
Person
22
Cluster sampling
  • In cluster sampling we take a random sample of
    strata and then survey every member of the group.
  • For example, if our strata were individuals
    schools in a city, we would randomly select a
    number of schools and then test all of the
    students within those schools.

23
Multi-phase sample
Population
Sample
Test 1
Sub-sample
Test 2
24
Estimation of the sample size
  • how many subjects should be studied?
  • The sample size depends on the following factors
  • I. Effect size
  • II. Variability of the measurement
  • III. Level of significance
  • IV. Power of the study

25
I. Effect size
  • magnitude of the difference to be detected
  • A large sample size is needed for detection of a
    minute difference. Thus, the sample size is
    inversely related to the effect size.

26
II. Variability of the measurement
  • The variability of measurements is reflected by
    the standard deviation or the variance.
  • The higher the standard deviation, the larger
    sample size is required. Thus, sample size is
    directly related to the SD

27
III. Level of significance
  • Relies on a error or type I error. The maximum
    level of a has been arbitrarily set to 5 or
    0.05.
  • Alpha error can be minimized to 0.01 or even
    0.001 but this consequently increases the sample
    size. Thus, sample size is inversely related to
    the level of a error.

28
IV. Power of the study
  • The power of the study is the probability that it
    will yield a statistically significant result. It
    is related to ß error or type II error.
  • Power is equal to (1- ß), consequently the power
    of the study is increased by decreasing the beta
    error. Thus, sample size is inversely related to
    the level of ß error or directly related to the
    power of the study.

29
3. Collection of Data
  • Data collected are variables
  • Variables are classified according to their
  • Type
  • QT (continuous, discrete)
  • QL ( ordinal, nominal)
  • Role in the study
  • Dependent
  • Independent
  • Relationship with other study factors
  • Main study variables
  • Confounding variables
  • Effect modifiers
  • Intermediate factors

30
Methods of collection of data (research tools)
  • Selection of the suitable technique depends on
  • The availability of information
  • The type of data
  • The resources available
  • The characteristic of the tool

31
Research tools
  • Most important techniques
  • Using available information (records)
  • Observation (checklist)
  • Self-administered questionnaire
  • Interviewing (individual/group)
  • Measuring (all lab tests and other investigations)

32
Choosing the Format of Your questionnaire
Questions
  • Fixed alternative
  • Yes/No
  • Reliable
  • Not powerful
  • Likert
  • Open-ended
  • May not be properly answered
  • May be difficult to score

33
Choosing the Format of Your Interview
  • Unstructured
  • Interviewer bias is a serious problem
  • Data may not be hard to analyze
  • Semi-structured
  • Follow-up questions allowed
  • Probably best for pilot studies
  • Structured
  • Standardized, reducing interviewer bias

34
Editing Questions Nine Mistakes to Avoid
1. Avoid leading questions 2. Avoid questions
that invite the social desirability bias 3. Avoid
double-barreled questions 4. Avoid long questions
5. Avoid negations 6. Avoid irrelevant
questions 7. Avoid poorly worded response
options 8. Avoid big words 9. Avoid ambiguous
words phrases
35
Measurements Errors
  • Definition of error
  • A false or mistaken result obtained in a study
    or an experiment John last, 2001.
  • Types of errors
  • Systematic error bias
  • an error having a certain magnitude and
    direction repeated with every measurement
  • Random error
  • error with no fixed pattern of magnitude or
    direction

36
  • Sources of errors
  • Subject
  • Observer
  • instrument

37
Bias
Design Bias
Information Bias (observer bias)
Interviewer bias
sample bias
Measurement bias (intra and inter obs. Bias)
Study selection bias
Reporting bias
Recall bias
Response bias
Technical bias
38
Design bias
  • Selection bias
  • Selection bias is a distortion of the estimate of
    effect resulting from the manner in which the
    study population is selected.
  • This is probably the most common type of bias in
    health research, and occurs in observational, as
    well as analytical studies (including
    experiments).

39
  • a. Prevalence-incidence bias
  • This type of bias can be introduced into a
    case-control study as a result of selective
    survival among the prevalent cases.
  • In selecting cases, we are having a late look at
    the disease if the exposure occurred years
    before, mild cases that improved, or severe cases
    that died would have been missed and not counted
    among the cases.

40
  • b. Admission rate (Berksons) bias
  • This type of bias is due to selective factors of
    admission to hospitals, and occurs in
    hospital-based studies.
  • The diseased individuals with a second disorder,
    or a complication of the original disease, are
    more likely to be represented in a hospital-based
    sample than other members of the general
    population.
  • Differential rates of admission will be reflected
    in biased estimates of the relative risks.

41
  • Non-response bias
  • This type of bias is due to refusals to
    participate in a study.
  • The individuals who do not participate are likely
    to be different from individuals who do
    participate. Non-respondents must be compared
    with respondents with regard to key exposure and
    outcome variables in order to ascertain the
    relative degree of non-response bias.

42
  • Ascertainment or information bias
  • Information bias is a distortion in the
    estimate of effect due to measurement error or
    misclassification of subjects according to one or
    more variables.

43
  • Measurement bias
  • Observer variation bias
  • Intra-observer variation
  • Inter-observer variation
  • Subject (biological variation)
  • Technical method error variation

44
  • Recall bias
  • An error of categorization may occur if
    information on the exposure variable is unknown
    or inaccurate.
  • The recall by both cases and controls may differ
    in both amount and accuracy. Cases are more
    likely to recall exposures, especially if there
    has been recent media exposure on the potential
    causes of the disease.
  • Example In questioning mothers whose recent
    pregnancies had ended in fetal death or
    malformation (cases), and a matched group of
    mothers whose pregnancies had ended normally
    (controls), it was found that 48 of the former,
    but only 20 of the latter reported exposure to
    drugs.

45
4. Work plan
  • State in specific steps what exactly
  • will be done
  • Method
  • Listing the activities related to the study
    (planning, implementation, results)
  • Identification of the responsibility for each
    activity
  • Setting time and date for achievement of each
    activity
  • Putting all these elements together in a legible
    form which could be a chart (GANNT chart) or a
    table
  • Budget and any funding agencies

46
Administering the Research
  • Informed consent
  • Clear instructions
  • Debriefing
  • Confidentiality

47
5. Data management
  • Data management is the whole process of dealing
    with data from the very beginning of the study.
    Data analysis is just the last part of it.
  • It can be divided into the following phases
  • Preparation of data entry
  • Data entry
  • Data analysis

48
  • Preparation for data entry
  • Review of questionnaire forms
  • Unique I identifier
  • Coding
  • Preparation of master-sheets (manual) or
    spread-sheets (computer)
  • Dummy tables
  • Quality control
  • Data entry

49
  • Data analysis
  • Descriptive
  • Tabular presentation
  • Frequency distribution tables
  • Cross tabulations
  • Graphic presentation
  • Bar charts
  • Pie charts
  • Line graphs
  • Others
  • Numeric presentation
  • Percentages and percentiles
  • Measures of central tendency
  • Measures of dispersion

50
  • Analytic
  • The researcher uses principles of
    biostatistics to test his hypothesis. Detection
    of proper statistical test depends on
  • The objective of the study
  • Descriptive
  • Looking for a difference
  • Looking for an association
  • Type of variable
  • QT
  • QL
  • Distribution of the variable
  • Normal
  • Binomial
  • Poisson
  • others

51
6. Interpretation
  • Discussion of the results in a way that relates
    data obtained to each other clarifying the
    associations and other findings.

52
  • 7. Reporting comes next.

53
  • Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com